Skip to content
Int'L Orthodox Christian Charities Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Int'L Orthodox Christian Charities Inc

Iocc, in the spirit of christ's love, offers emergency relief and development programs to those in need worldwide, without discrimination, and strengthens the capacity of the orthodox church to so respond.

$16M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$254kReligion$232kHuman Services$62kInternational$10k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $26,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $16,236,086 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,210,086 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAKAI FOUNDATION$20,000
LOWES FOUNDATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES CAMP NOAH: $62k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN SO: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IN
PA
CA
CO
WV
MD
NC
HI
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $16M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions, $14M to organizations and $1.8M to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$7.8M · 49% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: EDUCATION · EMERGENCY RESPONSE · HEALTH

Middle East and North Africa$4.2M · 26% · 11 grants · 27878 people

Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RESPONSE · EDUCATION, EMERGENCY RESPONSE · SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS

Russia and Neighboring States$3.3M · 20% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: HEALTH · SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS · EDUCATION, EMERGENCY RESPONSE

Central America and the Caribbean$473k · 3% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: EDUCATION · EDUCATION, HEALTH · FOOD SECURITY, EMERGENCY RESPONSE

Sub-Saharan Africa$323k · 2% · 4 grants · 552 people

Stated purpose: FOOD SECURITY · HEALTH · EDUCATION, HEALTH, FOOD SECURITY

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lutheran Social Services Disaster Response Inc

Our mission is to provide help, healing and hope in the name of jesus christ.

—
2
Focus Humanitarian Assistance Usa

Focus Humanitarian Assistance (FOCUS) is a crisis-response and disaster-risk management agency and its mission is to save lives, reduce suffering and create resilience in communities prone to man-made or natural disasters.

International
3
Faith Responders Inc

The mission of Faith Responders is to empower, engage and equip congregations to share the restorative love of God through disaster response and recovery.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Collaborating Agencies Disaster Relief Effort

Train and coordinate non-profit and faith organizations to support the local community during disaster response

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Disaster Aid Usa Inc

.to provide immediate disaster relief and humanitarian aid here in the united states and worldwide, to those victims who have, and continue suffering from the effects of disasters, natural or man-made while using high ethical standards.

Human Services
6
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Lexington Inc

Our mission is to serve christ by accompanying individuals, families, and communities with compassion, support, and resources as they move from hardship to stability with dignity.

—
7
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

—
8
Rebuilding Together New Orleans

Rebuilding together new orleans helps low to moderate income greater new orleans area homeowners repair and rehabilitate their homes. rtno stabilizes and revitalizes neighborhoods and improves health and safety in our communities.

Philanthropy
9
The Salvation Army World Service Office

To support and strengthen the salvation army's efforts to work hand in hand with communities to improve the health, economic, and spiritual conditions of the poor throughout the world.

International
10
Katy Responds

Katy Responds is a collaborative network of churches, businesses and community organizations committed to providing care & restoration services returning families to their homes following disaster, as well as assist in community readiness.

Human Services
11
Crisis Response International

To resource, train, and mobilize volunteers, churches,& other organizations to respond to disasters in the united states & world-wide

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St Louis

To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence. our values are dignity, hospitality, service, excellence, compassion, and joy.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Archdiocese of New Orleans; the most unlike its peers is The Rotary District 6200 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
13/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANNUNCIATION GREEK ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL: $100,800 · OtherANNUNCIATION GREEK ORTHODOX CATHEDRALST GEORGE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $36,200 · OtherST GEORGE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHURCHST MICHAEL ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH: $19,200 · OtherST MICHAEL ANTIOCHIAN ORTHODOX CHURCHSAINT BASIL THE GREAT GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $18,400 · OtherSAINT BASIL THE GREAT GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCHST SAVA SERBIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH: $12,500 · OtherST SAVA SERBIAN ORTHODOX CHURCHAssumption of the Virgin Mary Greek Orthodox Churc: $11,900 · OtherMENNONITE DISASTER SERVICE: $10,000 · OtherGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH DISCIPLES OF CHRIST INC: $9,600 · OtherSS CONSTANTINE & HELEN SERBIAN ORTHODOX: $8,800 · Other+1 more: $5,400 · OtherIOCC FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $144,718 · ReligionIOCC FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDVOLUSIA INTERFAITH AGENCIES NETWORKING IN DISASTER INC: $22,500 · ReligionVOLUSIA INTERFAITH AGENCIES NETWORKI…Patriarch Athenagoras Orthodox Institute: $10,000 · ReligionPatriarch Athenagoras Orthodox Insti…LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $62,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCI…PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN …WV VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE IN DISASTER INC: $13,900 · Public Safety & DisasterTEAM RUBICON INC: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNECHAMA - JEWISH RESPONSE TO DISASTER: $9,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC: $6,000 · Public Safety & DisasterEASTERN SHORE LONG TERM RECOVERY COMMITTEE: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMAKAI FOUNDATION: $20,000 · AnimalsCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $10,000 · InternationalLowes Foundation: $6,000 · Education
Other$232,800Religion$177,218Human Services$67,500Public Safety & Disaster$43,900Animals$20,000International$10,000Education$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIOCC FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $144,718 over 5y, 14% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $62,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVOLUSIA INTERFAITH AGENCIES NETWORKING IN DISASTER INC: $22,500 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetMAKAI FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetWV VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS ACTIVE IN DISASTER INC: $13,900 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPatriarch Athenagoras Orthodox Institute: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNECHAMA - JEWISH RESPONSE TO DISASTER: $9,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLowes Foundation: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERN SHORE LONG TERM RECOVERY COMMITTEE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Volunteer Florida Fou…Good360Enterprise Holdings F…Greater Houston Commu…Raymond James Charita…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…Natl Christian Charit…
Volunteer Florida Foundation IncFL13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc · Good360 · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Int'L Orthodox Christian Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Int'L Orthodox Christian Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Presbyterian Social Ministries Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Int'L Orthodox Christian Charities Inc?

Find your warmest path to Int'L Orthodox Christian Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $16M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Int'L Orthodox Christian Charities’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home