Loading…
· Public charity
INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC
Iocc, in the spirit of christ's love, offers emergency relief and development programs to those in need worldwide, without discrimination, and strengthens the capacity of the orthodox church to so respond.
$16M
Granted FY2024
2
Grants
2
Communities
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
provision rebuildingrebuilding supplies
2020
—
2021
—
2022
response
2024
powercommittedrecoveryresponse
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 2 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
- MAKAI FOUNDATION$20,000
- LOWES FOUNDATION$6,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
World Renew
World Renew's mission is to engage God's people in redeeming resources and developing gifts in collaborative acts of mercy, justice, and compassion. This work, which is focused on relief and community development.
—
2
New York Disaster
To develop and support faith-based disaster readiness, response, and recovery services for new york city - and, supports recovery in disaster-impacted communities with a direct connection to nyc.
Public Safety & Disaster
3
Lutheran Social Services Disaster
Our mission is to provide help, healing and hope in the name of jesus christ.
—
4
United Way of Southeast Louisiana
To eradicate poverty in southeast louisiana.
Philanthropy
5
Lutheran Social Services of
Stabilize lives during crisis and transition, build a foundation where people can thrive, and preserve dignity and respect for the most vulnerable.
Religion
6
Corus International Inc
This return should be reviewed together with corus international's related organizations lutheran world relief, inc., interchurch medical assistance inc., and corus solutions, inc. corus international's mission is to operate exclusively as…
Human Services
7
United Food Bank
Uniting communities to alleviate hunger.
Food & Nutrition
8
Churches of Christ Disaster Relief
The organization is dedicated to responding immediately to any major disaster within the continental united states, by providing prepacked food boxes, personal hygiene boxes, baby care boxes, pallets of water, cleaning supplies, new…
Religion
9
Rebuilding Together New Orleans
Rebuilding together new orleans repairs homes, revitalizes communities, and rebuilds lives.
Philanthropy
10
Christian Mission for the United Nations
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
—
11
Crisis Response International
To resource, train, & mobilize organizations to respond to disasters in the us & world-wide
Public Safety & Disaster
12
Catholic Charities of Central and
Inspired by the Gospel of the Beatitudes as proclaimed by Jesus Christ, Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri is committed to providing care and creating hope for the lives of the vulnerable through compassionate social…
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Mission Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Rotary Foundation of Rotary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
2%1/46
the rest of the field
11%
206,163/1,819,519
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
05the grantee network
25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
13/25
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$232,800Religion$177,218Human Services$67,500Public Safety & Disaster$43,900Animals$20,000International$10,000Education$6,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IOCC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES CAMP NOAH ↗
- Who funds VOLUSIA INTERFAITH (VIND) ↗
- Who funds MAKAI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WEST VIRGINIA VOAD ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON ↗
- Who funds PATRIARCH ATHENAGORAS ORTHODOX INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CWS GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds NECHAMA ↗
- Who funds ST BERNARD ↗
- Who funds LOWES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN SO ↗
- Who funds SOMERSET COUNTY LTRC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Volunteer Florida Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc · Good360 · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
- Presbyterian Social Ministries Inc — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: IOCC FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~42 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 861131936 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on IOCC FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 42 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 14% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Int'L Orthodox Christian Charities Inc?
Find your warmest path to Int'L Orthodox Christian Charities Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines