How much did INNOVIS HEALTH LLC grant in FY2023?

Health$3.3MHuman Services$151kCommunity Improvement$124kHousing & Shelter$79kPhilanthropy$69kEducation$56kFood & Nutrition$42kReligion$28kCivil Rights$7kOther$774k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

create

2020

—

2021

visioncreatechildcare

2022

childrensouth sudanese

2023

economicyouthchildimpactfargo-moorheadsouth sudanesepoverty

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k1 grant · $7k
$10k–50k14 grants · $223k
$50k–250k2 grants · $155k
$250k+1 grant · $706k

$15,100

Median grant

States reached

$321M

Total assets

Largest grants

ESSENTIA HEALTH FOUNDATION$705,829
MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY-MOORHEAD$105,000
SOUL SOLUTIONS RECOVERY CENTER$50,100
FAITH4HOPE SCHOLARSHIP FUND$31,250
EMERGING PRARIE$25,000
JASMIN SERVICES$25,000
LAKES & PRAIRIES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP$19,000
UNITED WAY OF CASS CLAY$16,000
FIRSTLINK$15,100
IMMIGRANT DEVELOPMENT CENTER$15,000
NEW AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT AGENCY$15,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$12,000
CASS CLAY COMMUNITY LAND TRUST$10,000
SOUTH SUDANESE FOUNDATION$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN FARGO-MOORHEAD$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $151k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.2M · 16 repeat orgs$428k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +119% since the first grant, against +95% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.2M

$278k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+119%

+95%

Still filing today

75%

86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $151k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Community ImprovementHuman ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

EH
ESSENTIA HEALTH FOUNDATION
6× · 2018–2023 · $3.1M · revenue +27%
DM
DAKOTA MEDICAL FOUNDATION
2× · 2019–2021 · $115k · revenue +94%
UW
UNITED WAY OF CASS COUNTY
6× · 2018–2023 · $78k · revenue +4%

Funded once

MS
MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MOORHEAD ALUMNI FOUNDATION INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +149%
GP
GREAT PLAINS FOOD BANKgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $42k · revenue +39%
PP
PRARIE PINES CHILDCARE CNTER
one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services

Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and

Advance public policy & job growth strategies to create an environment for businesses to prosper

—

Fargo Union Mission

Provide lodging, meals, clothing, and assistance to men, women and children in the community.

—

Central Minnesota Jobs & Training

Strengthen central mn communities through leadership in workforce excellence

—

Southeastern North Dakota Community

Assistance to low-income individuals in a six county area of north dakota.

Human Services

Minnesota Business Partnership

To maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans.

—

Metropolitan Economic Development

Helping minority entrepreneurs succeed.

—

Catholic Charities North Dakota

Catholic Charities of North Dakota provides services to people in need across the state of ND.

—

Keystone Community Services

To strengthen the capacity of individuals and families to improve their quality of life.

—

West Central Minnesota Communities

Empowering people while providing services and resources that impact individuals and communities.

Community Improvement

Dickinson Area Chamber of Commerce

Promote business and community development in the dickinson, nd, area.

—

United Way of Ne Minnesota

Invest in nonprofits, programs, collaborations that equip, empower and create opportunities for all to thrive.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Anne Carlsen Center and the most unlike its peers is Dakota Medical Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 24. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund close more than the field — 8% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3/38

the rest of the field

202/2,751

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

30/30

Grantees still filing

25/30

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$3,269,378Other$850,557Human Services$150,900Community Improvement$124,340Housing & Shelter$79,000Philanthropy$68,750Education$56,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fargo-Moorhead Area FoundationND51.8× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Otto Bremer Trust · Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · West Central Initiative · Dakota Medical Charities · The Barry Foundation · North Dakota Community Foundation · Dakota Medical Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · First Lutheran Church Foundation · Offutt Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation INNOVIS HEALTH LLC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WOMEN INITIATIVE NETWORK OF LIBERIA IN FARGO ND.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 831823044 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WOMEN INITIATIVE NETWORK OF LIBERIA IN FARGO ND, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 53% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Innovis Health LLC?

Find your warmest path to Innovis Health LLC through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

INNOVIS HEALTH LLC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Innovis Health LLC?

More from the funding graph

INNOVIS HEALTH LLC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Innovis Health LLC?

More from the funding graph