Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Innovis Health LLC

We are called to make a healthy difference in people's lives.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$701k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$5.0MEducation$528kEnvironment$200kHuman Services$188kCommunity Improvement$174kPhilanthropy$167kHousing & Shelter$133kYouth Development$106kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 22 grants below total $1,037,093 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,089,951 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $52,858 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $244k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
  • $250k+1 grant · $701k
$13,700
Median grant
2
States reached
$326M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ESSENTIA HEALTH FOUNDATION$700,957
MOUNTAIN-PLAINS YOUTH WORKS$55,000
THE CHAMBER FARGO MOORHEAD WEST FARGO$25,000
SOUL SOLUTIONS RECOVERY CENTER INC$25,000
MINNESOTA FLYERS GYMNASTICS INC$25,000
UNITED WAY OF CASS CLAY$22,600
BIO GIRLS$20,500
PRESENTATION PARTNERS IN HOUSING$20,386
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$15,000
SOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$15,000
IMMIGRANT DEVELOPMENT CENTER$13,700
STEPPING STONES MINISTRIES$12,150
CHURCHES UNITED FOR THE HOMELESS$10,100
GATEWAY TO SCIENCE CENTER INC$10,000
LUTHERAN CHURCH OF THE CROSS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $246k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PRARIE PINES CHILDCARE CNTER: $25k → 11%American National Red Cross: $10k → 14%MOUNTAIN-PLAINS YOUTH WORKS: $55k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%SACRED PIPE RESOURCE CENTER: $7k → 10%LAKES & PRAIRIES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $19k → 11%LAKES AND PRAIRIES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC: $8k → 11%FIRSTLINK: $25k → 12%FIRSTLINK: $25k → 12%FIRSTLINK: $15k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN FARGO-MOORHEAD: $10k → 12%WOMEN INITIATIVE NETWORK OF LIBERIA IN FARGO ND: $7k → 12%FIRSTLINK: $5k → 12%SOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.1M · 23 repeat orgs$529k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
20

Total granted

$6.1M
$367k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
0%

Still filing today

83%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthHousing & ShelterEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    ESSENTIA HEALTH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.7M · revenue +105%
  • UW
    United Way of Cass-Clay
    9× · 2017–2025 · $141k · revenue +4%
  • SS
    Soul Solutions Recovery Center Inc
    2× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • MS
    MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MOORHEAD FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +142%
  • GP
    Great Plains Food Bank
    one grant, 2021 · $42k · revenue -8%
  • UO
    University of North Dakota-College of Business & Public Admin
    one grant, 2017 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
2
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
3
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
4
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
5
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
6
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
7
Community Resource Connections Inc

Improving access to and the effectiveness of services through facilitation and coordination of community services and provision of information and referral services.

Community Improvement
8
Keystone Community Services

To strengthen the capacity of individuals and families to improve their quality of life.

—
9
NorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Inc

Our mission is "Partnering to Create a Healthier Community." NorthPoint seeks to reduce health disparities, improve health outcomes, and enhance the overall quality of life for all residents of North Minneapolis

Health
10
Dickinson Area Chamber of Commerce

The dickinson area chamber of commerce will provide leadership to promote a progressive business environment.

—
11
Dakota Plains Legal Services

To promote equal access to justice and improve the lives of low-income clients through quality legal assistance

—
12
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency and the most unlike its peers is Valley Lake Boys Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 21. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%2%<5yr13%17%5–10yr16%27%10–20yr13%27%20–35yr18%10%35–55yr20%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr16%81%10–20yr13%6%20–35yr18%2%35–55yr20%5%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
3/54
the rest of the field
9%
193/2,143

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
27/43
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ESSENTIA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $4,718,815 · HealthESSENTIA HEALTH FOUNDATION+4 more — $230,100 · HealthFOND DU LAC TRIBAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $312,500 · OtherFOND DU LAC TRIBAL…FOFJV LLP — $200,000 · OtherFOFJV LLPUnited Way of Cass-Clay — $140,600 · OtherUnited Way of Cass…MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MOORHEAD FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · OtherMINNESOTA STATE UN…Great Plains Food Bank — $42,100 · OtherBIO Girls Inc — $41,000 · Other+19 more — $245,957 · Other+19 moreFIRSTLINK — $70,300 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN PLAINS YOUTH WORKS — $55,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $30,200 · Human ServicesLAKES AND PRAIRIES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $26,500 · Human ServicesPRAIRIE PINES CHILDCARE CENTER — $25,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $15,000 · Human ServicesSTEPPING STONE MINISTRIES — $12,150 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN FARGO- MOORHEAD — $10,000 · Human Services+2 more — $13,700 · Human ServicesGREATER FARGO MOORHEAD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $60,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CHAMBER FARGO MOORHEAD WEST FARGO — $36,840 · Community ImprovementIMMIGRANT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $28,700 · Community ImprovementFM Rotary Foundation — $25,000 · Community ImprovementEMERGING PRAIRIE — $25,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTH SUDANESE FOUNDATION — $17,500 · Community ImprovementCASS CLAY COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $75,000 · Housing & ShelterJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $39,000 · Housing & ShelterPRESENTATION PARTNERS IN HOUSING — $20,386 · Housing & ShelterFAITH4HOPE SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $76,550 · PhilanthropyFARGO-MOORHEAD AREA FOUNDATION CORPORATION — $10,100 · PhilanthropyNORTH DAKOTA DENTAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyJASMIN SERVICES — $50,000 · EducationANNE CARLSEN CENTER — $12,100 · Education
Health$4,948,915Other$1,082,157Human Services$257,850Community Improvement$193,040Housing & Shelter$134,386Philanthropy$96,650Education$62,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetESSENTIA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $4,718,815 over 9y, 13% of budgetUnited Way of Cass-Clay — $140,600 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetDakota Medical Foundation — $115,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFAITH4HOPE SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $76,550 over 3y, 98% of budgetSoul Solutions Recovery Center Inc — $75,100 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCASS CLAY COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $75,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetFIRSTLINK — $70,300 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetGREATER FARGO MOORHEAD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $60,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetGreat Plains Food Bank — $42,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIO Girls Inc — $41,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $39,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHAMBER FARGO MOORHEAD WEST FARGO — $36,840 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $30,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSISSIPPI HEADWATERS AREA DENTAL DBA NORTHERN DENTAL ACCESS CENTER — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetIMMIGRANT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $28,700 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetLAKES AND PRAIRIES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC — $26,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFM Rotary Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetEMERGING PRAIRIE — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPRAIRIE PINES CHILDCARE CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCULTURAL DIVERSITY RESOURCES — $22,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetPRESENTATION PARTNERS IN HOUSING — $20,386 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTH SUDANESE FOUNDATION — $17,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCHURCHES UNITED — $15,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPPING STONE MINISTRIES — $12,150 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetANNE CARLSEN CENTER — $12,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFARGO-MOORHEAD AREA FOUNDATION CORPORATION — $10,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY TO SCIENCE CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA DENTAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN FARGO- MOORHEAD — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWellness in the Woods Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWOMEN INITIATIVE NETWORK OF LIBERIA — $6,500 over 1y, 53% of budgetGREATER NORTH DAKOTA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $5,980 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE INC — $5,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetABUSED ADULT RESOURCE CENTER — $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEAVENS HELPERS — $5,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fargo-Moorhead Area F…Blue Cross Blue Shiel…North Dakota Communit…The Barry FoundationOtto Bremer TrustSanford Group ReturnMidcontinent Foundati…West Central Initiati…Dakota Medical Founda…Dakota Medical Charit…Alex Stern Family Fou…Impact Foundation
Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation CorporationND54.4× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · North Dakota Community Foundation · The Barry Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Sanford Group Return · Midcontinent Foundation · West Central Initiative · Dakota Medical Foundation · Dakota Medical Charities · Alex Stern Family Foundation · Impact Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Innovis Health LLC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines