· Public charity
Inland Power and Light
Distribution and sale of electricity.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $82k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SNAP | $43,763 |
| INLAND POWER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $38,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST | $6,713 |
| LIBERTY LAKE ROBOTICS TEAM SPONSORSHIP | $5,000 |
| SPOKANE SHADOW YOUTH SOCCER CLUB | $2,000 |
| GARFIELD COUNTY FOOD BANK | $1,500 |
| WASHINGTON WHEAT FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| COOPERATIVE FAMILY FUND | $1,000 |
| CDA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| DAVENPORT SENIOR CENTER | $750 |
| UPPER COLUMBIA RESOURCE AND COSERVATION | $750 |
| WEST PLAINS LITTLE LEAGUE | $700 |
| VANESSA BEHAN | $500 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $456k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SNSPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS9× · 2017–2025 · $449k · revenue +56%
- IPINLAND POWER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $163k · revenue +11% · 50% of their budget
- SHSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST9× · 2017–2025 · $77k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- RFRHS FALCON BOOSTERSone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +7%
- NINRECA INTERNATIONALone grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
- GCGARFIELD COUNTY CHRISTIAN YOUTH PROGRAMone grant, 2024 · $500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enhancing lives and building communities by providing transportation and nutrition services.
Influence local land use policy
Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.
Promoting family, farm & community life
Create a strong and effective statewide infrastructure that efficiently leverages resources to expand capacity in Washington State's Feeding America network.
The organization's mission is growing food justice through collective action. the organization's vision is ending hunger in washington state.
Administer the annual Latah County Livestock Sale
The pacific nw csa coalition promotes the growth of community supported agriculture by 1) connecting csa farmers with their local community, 2) supporting farmers through networking and other programming, 3) educating the public about the…
Facilitate healthy meals for children.
Secure available food for those in need. Creating an efficient sustainable partnership between food donors, meal providers and outreach workers.
Recommend minimum standards for fresh potatoes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Second Harvest Inland Northwest and the most unlike its peers is Washington Wheat Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds INLAND POWER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds RHS FALCON BOOSTERS ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FAMILY FUND ↗
- Who funds SPOKANE SHADOW YOUTH SOCCER CLUB ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON WHEAT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Upper Columbia RC&D ↗
- Who funds DAVENPORT SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds VANESSA BEHAN ↗
- Who funds COEUR D ALENE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds NRECA INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA ↗
- Who funds GREATER SPOKANE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Inland Power and Light funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.