Skip to content
Ingrid D Tauber Fund Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Ingrid D Tauber Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$606k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.4MInternational$2.1MReligion$455kPhilanthropy$399kCommunity Improvement$385kSocial Science$138kEducation$122kArts & Culture$90kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $176k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
  • $250k+2 grants · $906k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCSF FOUNDATION$606,000
TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY$300,000
SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL$100,000
INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC$50,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$50,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO$45,755
THE MAVEN PROJECT$25,000
FRIENDS OF SAN FRANCISCO ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL$25,000
BEKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE$25,000
SAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY$25,000
HAIR TO STAY$10,000
SAN FRANCISCO PSYCHOANALYTICS FOUNDATION$10,000
AGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE$10,000
GREENLIGHT CLINIC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $5k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.8M · 14 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
21

Total granted

$8.8M
$936k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+17%

Still filing today

71%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    Access Institute for Psychological Services
    2× · 2021–2022 · $402k · revenue +10%
  • COMMUNITY INITIATIVES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $285k · revenue +254%
  • SF
    San Francisco Center for Psychoanal
    5× · 2017–2022 · $130k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • CR
    CONGREGATION RODEF SHOLOM
    one grant, 2022 · $210k
  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA
    one grant, 2018 · $138k
  • CP
    CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $138k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
6
Jews of Color Initiative

The Jews of Color Initiatives mission is to advance racial equity in the U.S. Jewish community by centering the leadership of Jews of Color and ensuring that our communities and institutions reflect the multiracial reality of the Jewish…

Civil Rights
7
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
8
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
9
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
10
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
11
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
12
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma; the most unlike its peers is Aim High. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
17/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $4,264,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATI…+3 more: $60,000 · EducationTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $2,050,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT COMMUNITYJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $394,237 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF…COMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $285,182 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY INITIATIVESACCESS INSTITUTE FOR PHYSCHOLOGICAL: $540,000 · OtherACCESS INSTITUTE FOR PH…CONGREGATION EMANU-EL: $380,000 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-ELCONGREGATION RODEF SHOLOM: $210,000 · OtherCONGREGATION RODEF SHOL…HAIR TO STAY: $165,000 · OtherHAIR TO STAYAMERICAN SOCIETY OF UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA: $137,750 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF UNI…CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER: $137,500 · OtherCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDI…San Francisco Center for Psychoanal: $130,000 · OtherSan Francisco Center fo…+16 more: $407,500 · Other+16 moreAccess Institute for Psychological Services: $401,500 · HealthAccess In…SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $310,000 · HealthSAN FRANC…BAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $67,000 · HealthBAY AREA …HAIRTOSTAY: $55,000 · HealthHAIRTOSTA…THE MAVEN PROJECT: $50,000 · HealthTHE MAVEN…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementUrban Adamah: $25,000 · EnvironmentSAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM: $25,000 · EnvironmentEDUCATORS INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN: $27,750 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $16,500 · InternationalIMPACTISRAEL INC: $1,800 · International
Education$4,324,000Philanthropy$2,729,419Other$2,107,750Health$888,500Community Improvement$100,000Environment$50,000International$46,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $4,264,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $2,050,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetAccess Institute for Psychological Services: $401,500 over 2y, 12% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $394,237 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $310,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $285,182 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSan Francisco Center for Psychoanal: $130,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $67,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHAIRTOSTAY: $55,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTHE MAVEN PROJECT: $50,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetRHODE ISLAND COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJewish Commmunity High School of the Bay: $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEDUCATORS INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN: $27,750 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetUrban Adamah: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFriends of San Francisco Animal Care and Control: $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $16,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKATAHDIN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE OF THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREENLIGHT CLINIC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Fede…The Laszlo N Tauber F…John Pritzker Family …Lisa & Douglas Goldma…The San Francisco Fou…Lisa Stone Pritzker F…Ralph & Marsha Guggen…Koret FoundationThe Yelp FoundationThe Albert & Judith G…Rmlow FoundationThe Shimon Ben Joseph…
Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA22.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Laszlo N Tauber Family Foundation Inc · John Pritzker Family Fund · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Lisa Stone Pritzker Family Fund · Ralph & Marsha Guggenheim Family Foundation · Koret Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · The Albert & Judith Goldberg Foundation · Rmlow Foundation · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ingrid D Tauber Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ingrid D Tauber Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ingrid D Tauber Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ingrid D Tauber Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ingrid D Tauber’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home