Skip to content
Infosys Foundation USA at a glance

· Private foundation

Infosys Foundation USA

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.8M
Granted FY2026still arriving
50
Grants FY2026still arriving
20
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$24MScience & Tech$1.5MArts & Culture$1.1MYouth Development$1.0MCivil Rights$877kInternational$402kCommunity Improvement$235kPublic Benefit$180kOther$0
02FY2026 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k10 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $373k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.1M
$41,250
Median grant
20
States reached
$374k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Computer Science Teachers Association$300,000
National Association for Community College$250,000
Code Org$250,000
Miami EdTech Inc$250,000
Codejoy LLC$241,550
Raspberry Pi Foundation North America Inc$231,500
Televisa Foundation Inc$199,335
Kode with Klossy$185,000
Individual grant recipient$157,500
Stem From Dance$125,000
NAF$125,000
The Dallas Foundation$125,000
Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Dallas$100,000
Discovery Place Inc$100,000
Firia Inc$93,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $136k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GizmoCDA INC: $10k → 10%CHICKTECH: $10k → 12%Operation Pathways: $66k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27M · 60 repeat orgs$6.1M to everyone else

60 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2026, 27 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
205

Total granted

$27M
$5.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+16%

Still filing today

63%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $672k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentScience & TechEmploymentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • D
    DONORSCHOOSEORG
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +24%
  • CS
    COMPUTER SCIENCE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION LLC
    9× · 2017–2026 · $2.3M · revenue +487%
  • TF
    TELEVISA FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2026 · $418k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • KW
    Kode with Klossy
    one grant, 2023 · $259k
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue +22%
  • NY
    NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
    one grant, 2017 · $244k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girls in Stem
Human Services
2
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
3
Techcongress Foundation

Techcongress gives talented technologists the opportunity to gain first-hand experience in federal policymaking and shape the future of tech policy through fellowships with members of congress and congressional committees.

Community Improvement
4
New Classrooms Innovation Partners Inc

To create and inspire better ways to give every student an educational foundation for lifelong success. we imagine a world where every student attends a school that meets them where they are, adapts to the unique ways they learn, and…

Education
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
6
Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago

Achieving international impact through world-class research and education in fundamental computer science and information technology.

Education
7
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
8
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering Inc

To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.

Civil Rights
9
The Concord Consortium Incorporated

The concord consortium innovates and inspires equitable, large-scale improvements in stem teaching and learning through technology...(continued on schedule o)

Education
10
Tech Exposure & Access Through Mentoring Inc

The organization's mission is to prepare students for opportunities available at the intersection of technology and sports.

Employment
11
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
12
Mentoring Youth Through Technology

To propel youth to thrive in a technology driven world.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Education Training and Research Associates; the most unlike its peers is Quorum Outreach and Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 282 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
122/125
Grantees still filing
74/125
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CODEORG: $9,260,000 · EducationCODEORGDONORSCHOOSEORG: $2,678,354 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORGCOMPUTER SCIENCE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION LLC: $2,337,114 · EducationCOMPUTER SCIENCE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION LLC+32 more: $3,334,517 · Education+32 moreOne10 LLC: $1,207,419 · OtherOne10 LLCCodeJoy LLC: $880,650 · OtherCodeJoy LLCMV GATE INC: $545,000 · OtherMV GATE INCThurgood Marshal College Fund: $460,000 · Other+121 more: $6,975,317 · Other+121 moreTELEVISA FOUNDATION INC: $418,335 · Arts & CultureOPERA ON TAP: $344,766 · Arts & CultureDISCOVERY PLACE INC: $235,000 · Arts & CultureSTEM FROM DANCE INC: $125,000 · Arts & CultureBAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $70,000 · Arts & CultureMOCO KIDSCO INC: $65,000 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $70,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD: $392,027 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentTECH KIDS UNLIMITED INC: $188,000 · Youth DevelopmentDIGITAL NEST INC: $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentCODEART INC: $104,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentMaker Education Initiative: $62,000 · Youth Development+4 more: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentRASPBERRY PI FOUNDATION NORTH AMERICA INC: $381,500 · Science & TechNEW YORK CITY FOUNDATION FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION INC D/B/A CSFORALL: $260,000 · Science & TechASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY INC: $250,425 · Science & TechProject Invent: $128,500 · Science & TechScratch Foundation: $50,000 · Science & Tech+5 more: $75,000 · Science & TechPENCIL INC: $417,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $138,500 · PhilanthropySCIENCE BUDDIES: $54,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyDIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL: $266,162 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE BRITISH COUNCIL USA: $194,499 · International
Education$17,609,985Other$10,068,386Arts & Culture$1,328,101Youth Development$1,281,527Science & Tech$1,145,425Philanthropy$620,000International$460,661

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCODEORG: $9,260,000 over 10y, 7.8% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $2,678,354 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCOMPUTER SCIENCE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION LLC: $2,337,114 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetMV GATE INC: $545,000 over 5y, 74% of budgetKODE WITH KLOSSY INC: $485,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTELEVISA FOUNDATION INC: $418,335 over 3y, 18% of budgetPENCIL INC: $417,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $415,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD: $392,027 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetRASPBERRY PI FOUNDATION NORTH AMERICA INC: $381,500 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetREADYCT INC: $381,050 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetOPERA ON TAP: $344,766 over 4y, 40% of budgetBLACK GIRLS CODE INC: $335,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetMIAMI EDTECH INC: $334,362 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetHispanic Heritage Foundation: $275,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetDIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL: $266,162 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK CITY FOUNDATION FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION INC D/B/A CSFORALL: $260,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $243,691 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDISCOVERY PLACE INC: $235,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $230,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCICP FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE BRITISH COUNCIL USA: $194,499 over 3y, 17% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $192,150 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTECH KIDS UNLIMITED INC: $188,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $156,900 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $155,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Invent: $128,500 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetSTUDENT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: $120,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetDIGITAL NEST INC: $120,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetKISS Institute for Practical Robotics: $119,600 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE INC: $110,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCODEART INC: $104,500 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetCOLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC: $101,255 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPSCI ABC: $72,000 over 1y, 87% of budgetBAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $70,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMOCO KIDSCO INC: $65,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMaker Education Initiative: $62,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetSCIENCE BUDDIES: $54,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE CODING SCHOOL: $51,100 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCITIZEN SCHOOLS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetScratch Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetARIZONA TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetQUORUM OUTREACH AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $48,900 over 4y, 11% of budgetCode For Fun: $30,950 over 2y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CODEORG ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds COMPUTER SCIENCE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION LLC ↗
  • Who funds MV GATE INC ↗
  • Who funds KODE WITH KLOSSY INC ↗
  • Who funds TELEVISA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PENCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds RASPBERRY PI FOUNDATION NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds READYCT INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERA ON TAP ↗
  • Who funds BLACK GIRLS CODE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI EDTECH INC ↗
  • Who funds Hispanic Heritage Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY FOUNDATION FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION INC D/B/A CSFORALL ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
  • Who funds CICP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE BRITISH COUNCIL USA ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TECH KIDS UNLIMITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Tides FoundationPwc Foundation IncAkamai Foundation IncIntel FoundationMotorola Solutions Fo…Broadcom FoundationGlenn W Bailey Charit…Pinkerton FoundationHispanic Federation I…Hartford Foundation f…Scratch Foundation
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA23.5× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Pwc Foundation Inc · Akamai Foundation Inc · Intel Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Broadcom Foundation · Glenn W Bailey Charitable Trust · Pinkerton Foundation · Hispanic Federation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Scratch Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Infosys Foundation USA funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Infosys Foundation USA. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Girls for Technology Inc: 80% of income from government
  • Readyct Inc: 61% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Kiss Institute for Practical Robotics: 30% of income from government
  • The Boys and Girls Clubs of Hartford: 20% of income from government
  • Televisa Foundation Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Moco Kidsco Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Citizen Schools Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Girl Develop It: 7% of income from government
  • Digital Harbor Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated: 1% of income from government
  • Collegiate Pathways Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Possible Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Eli Whitney Museum Inc: 0% of income from government
  • South Tech Charter Academy Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Infosys Foundation USA?

Find your warmest path to Infosys Foundation USA through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 282 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Infosys Foundation USA’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home