Skip to content

· Private foundation

Infinite Campus Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$355kPublic Safety & Disaster$127kHuman Services$107kEducation$89kYouth Development$50kCrime & Legal$20kCommunity Improvement$15kRecreation & Sports$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,958
Median grant
1
States reached
$71k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PACER CENTER INC$100,000
ACHIEVE SERVICES INC$16,000
THE FRONT LINE FOUNDATION$10,958
ANOKA COUNTY SWAT TEAM$10,000
CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #12$1,620
CENTENNIAL HIGH SCHOOL FISHING CLUB$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CANVAS HEALTH: $3k → 6%LINDQUIST & VENNUM WINTER CLOSET FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%CANVAS HEALTH: $1k → 6%THE MINNESOTA HUNDRED CLUB: $5k → 11%ACHIEVE SERVICES INC: $16k → 7%ACHIEVE SERVICES INC: $11k → 7%ACHIEVE SERVICES INC: $11k → 7%ACHIEVE SERVICES INC: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$537k · 13 repeat orgs$246k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
25

Total granted

$537k
$236k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
+30%

Still filing today

46%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthCivil RightsCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ACHIEVE SERVICES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $39k · revenue +24%
  • WC
    Washburn Center for Children
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +31%
  • CH
    CANVAS HEALTH INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • MP
    MN Prevention & Recovery Alliance LLCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +72%
  • AA
    ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
  • MT
    Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Minnesota Bridge to Freedom
Health
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
Achieve Twin Cities

As one of the upper midwest's leading career and college readiness organizations, achieve twin cities rallies community support and delivers best-in-class programs to inspire and equip young people in minneapolis and saint paul, minnesota…

Youth Development
5
Minneapolis Fire Foundation
Education
6
Nexus-Path Family Healing

Strengthening lives, families, and communities through our cornerstone values.

Human Services
7
Care in Action Minnesota

Our mission is to enhance the quality of life of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, strengthen families and prevent childhood maltreatment, by providing timely crucial support that meets the basic needs of local families and…

Human Services
8
Mental Health Minnesota

Mental Health Minnesota is the voice of lived mental health experience. We carry that declaration forward as we work to advance mental health and well-being for all, increase access to mental health treatment and services, and provide…

Health
9
Reading & Math Foundation

The reading and math foundation was established in 2011 to support the growing strategic initiatives of serveminnesota. the reading and math foundation directs charitable resources to education programs closing minnesota's achievement gap.

Education
10
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
11
Minnesouri Scholarship Foundation
Education
12
Evans Scholars Foundation - Minnesota

Educational

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pacer Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Lindquist & Vennum Winter Closet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMBIA HILLS OF EAST BETHEL LLC: $100,000 · OtherCAMBIA HILLS OF EAST BETHEL LLCMERCY AND UNITY HOSPITALS FOUNDATION: $79,300 · OtherMERCY AND UNITY HOSPITALS FOUNDATIONADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE MINNESOTA: $45,000 · OtherADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE MINNESOTAOPERATION NO LIMITS FOUNDATION: $21,200 · OtherOPERATION NO LIMITS FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF SWAT MINNESOTA NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION: $13,408 · Other+20 more: $82,030 · Other+20 morePACER CENTER INC: $110,000 · Civil RightsPACER CENTER IN…MN Prevention & Recovery Alliance LLC: $75,000 · HealthMN Prevention &…Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $25,000 · HealthMinnesota Teen …Washburn Center for Children: $6,000 · HealthWashburn Center…+1 more: $2,000 · HealthTHE FRONT LINE FOUNDATION: $107,654 · Crime & LegalTHE FRONT LINE …CENTENNIAL AREA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,790 · EducationCENTENNIA…True North Family Foundation: $5,000 · EducationTrue Nort…NEW LONDON-SPICER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $4,900 · EducationNEW LONDO…+1 more: $2,000 · EducationACHIEVE SERVICES INC: $39,000 · Human ServicesTHE LINDQUIST & VENNUM WINTER CLOSET FOUNDATION: $5,560 · Human ServicesTHE MINNESOTA HUNDRED CLUB: $4,880 · Human ServicesCANVAS HEALTH INC: $3,800 · Human ServicesHOPE 4 Youth: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$340,938Civil Rights$110,000Health$108,000Crime & Legal$107,654Education$62,690Human Services$53,240Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACER CENTER INC: $110,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE FRONT LINE FOUNDATION: $107,654 over 8y, 8.9% of budgetMERCY AND UNITY HOSPITALS FOUNDATION: $79,300 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMN Prevention & Recovery Alliance LLC: $75,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCENTENNIAL AREA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,790 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetACHIEVE SERVICES INC: $39,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWashburn Center for Children: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LINDQUIST & VENNUM WINTER CLOSET FOUNDATION: $5,560 over 1y, 14% of budgetTrue North Family Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetHOPE 4 Youth: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUBU PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetNEW LONDON-SPICER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $4,900 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetTHE MINNESOTA HUNDRED CLUB: $4,880 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $3,960 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANVAS HEALTH INC: $3,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $3,547 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANTHER FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLAINE HAM LAKE ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PACER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRONT LINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MERCY AND UNITY HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MN Prevention & Recovery Alliance LLC ↗
  • Who funds CENTENNIAL AREA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Washburn Center for Children ↗
  • Who funds THE LINDQUIST & VENNUM WINTER CLOSET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds True North Family Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOPE 4 Youth ↗
  • Who funds UBU PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NEW LONDON-SPICER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MINNESOTA HUNDRED CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CANVAS HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds PANTHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLINA HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLAINE HAM LAKE ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Connexus Energy FoundationMN21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Connexus Energy Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Walter C Rasmussen - Northeast Bank Foundation · Andersen Corporate Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Infinite Campus Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Infinite Campus Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Infinite Campus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph