Skip to content
Indianapolis Neighborhood Resource Center Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Indianapolis Neighborhood Resource Center Inc

INRC was established to provide training and technical assistance to neighborhood-based organizations and community development corporations throughout Marion County.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Community Improvement$297kReligion$138kArts & Culture$105kHousing & Shelter$91kHuman Services$56kRecreation & Sports$50kFood & Nutrition$38kHealth$38kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $13,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $17,926 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,926 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$327k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Friends of Garfield Park$13,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Felege Hiywot: $15k → 16%SOMEBODY INC: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$513k · 20 repeat orgs$386k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
36

Total granted

$513k
$386k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

50%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SN
    Southeast Neighborhood Development Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +22%
  • EC
    Englewood Community Development Corp
    2× · 2022–2024 · $22k · revenue +9%
  • DF
    Drug Free Marion County
    2× · 2022–2024 · $22k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNTAIN FLETCHER DISTRICT ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $26k · revenue 0% · 77% of their budget
  • BC
    BIG CAR MEDIA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -40%
  • CC
    CROOKED CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +370%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indianapolis Downtown Marketing Inc

Indianapolis Downtown Marketing, Inc. (IDMI) exists to improve downtown Indianapolis. IDMI focuses on marketing downtown businesses, destinations, organizations, activities and events.

—
2
Insight Development Corporation

Insight development corporation fosters low-income housing in and around indianapolis, indiana and the surrounding community.

Housing & Shelter
3
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
4
Groundwork Indy Inc

GWIs mission is to foster the sustained regeneration, improvement and management of the environment by developing community-based partnerships which empower people, businesses and organizations to promote environmental, economic & social…

Community Improvement
5
West Indianapolis Development Corp

To identify community resources, promote community assets and implement programs and activities that increase housing opportunities and improve the quality of life in West Indianapolis.

Community Improvement
6
Indianapolis Neighborhood Resource Center Inc

INRC was established to provide training and technical assistance to neighborhood-based organizations and community development corporations throughout Marion County.

Community Improvement
7
Indianapolis Downtown Inc

Indianapolis Downtown, Inc. (IDI) exists to improve downtown Indianapolis. It is action-oriented and addresses critical issues that affect downtown growth and well-being. IDI was established to continue the economic, social, and cultural…

Community Improvement
8
Perry County Development Corp

Promote development in Perry County, Indiana

—
9
Renew Indianapolis Inc F/K/a the Land Bank of Indianapolis Inc

To return vacant and abandoned property to productive use in the city of indianapolis, indiana

—
10
Innovation Connector Inc

To be east central indiana's primary sponsor bringing in technological firms.

Community Improvement
11
Habitat for Humanity Clark & Floyd Indiana Inc

The construction and renovation of homes for low income families.

—
12
Fair Housing Center of Central Indiana Inc

The mission of the fair housing center of central indiana (fhcci) is to facilitate open housing for all people by ensuring the availability of affordable and accessible housing; promoting housing choice and homeownership; advocating for an…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Broad Ripple Village Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chihuahua Rescue Indiana Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
12/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAWTHORNE SOCIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION INC: $48,572 · OtherHAWTHORNE SOCIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION INCCHRISTIAN PARK COMMUNITY GARDEN INC: $38,469 · OtherCHRISTIAN PARK COMMUNITY GARDEN INCTUXEDO PARK BAPTIST CHURCH: $32,450 · OtherTUXEDO PARK BAPTIST CHURCHNEAR EAST SIDE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC: $31,600 · OtherNEAR EAST SIDE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INCBEN DAVIS CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $29,711 · OtherFOUNTAIN FLETCHER DISTRICT ASSOCIATION INC: $26,429 · OtherBATES-HENDRICKS NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT: $22,551 · Other1000 WORDS INC: $22,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR PARK: $19,848 · OtherNEW HOPE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH INC: $19,818 · OtherMAPLETON FALL CREEK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $19,654 · Other+26 more: $258,195 · Other+26 moreSoutheast Neighborhood Development Inc: $40,323 · Community ImprovementSoutheast Nei…MIDTOWN INDIANAPOLIS INC: $18,782 · Community ImprovementMIDTOWN INDIA…COMMUNITY ALLIANCE OF THE FAR EASTSIDE INC: $17,500 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ALL…CROOKED CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15,204 · Community ImprovementCROOKED CREEK…Tourism Tomorrow Inc: $8,000 · Community ImprovementTourism Tomor…BROAD RIPPLE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 · Community ImprovementBROAD RIPPLE …Friends of Garfield Park Inc: $28,158 · Arts & CultureFriends o…BIG CAR MEDIA INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureBIG CAR M…ASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureASPIRE HI…Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric …UNITED NORTH EAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $28,315 · Housing & ShelterEnglewood Community Development Corp: $22,300 · Housing & ShelterBROOKSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterDrug Free Marion County: $21,500 · HealthThe Saturday Evening Post Society Inc: $16,694 · HealthINTOUCH OUTREACH RESOURCE CTR: $10,000 · HealthFelege Hiywot Center Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesSOMEBODY INC: $9,963 · Human ServicesCommunity heights: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$569,797Community Improvement$107,309Arts & Culture$78,158Housing & Shelter$60,615Health$48,194Human Services$24,963Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAWTHORNE SOCIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION INC: $48,572 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSoutheast Neighborhood Development Inc: $40,323 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED NORTH EAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $28,315 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetFriends of Garfield Park Inc: $28,158 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFOUNTAIN FLETCHER DISTRICT ASSOCIATION INC: $26,429 over 1y, 77% of budgetBIG CAR MEDIA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEnglewood Community Development Corp: $22,300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDrug Free Marion County: $21,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetMAPLETON FALL CREEK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $19,654 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMIDTOWN INDIANAPOLIS INC: $18,782 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE OF THE FAR EASTSIDE INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Saturday Evening Post Society Inc: $16,694 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFelege Hiywot Center Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHistoric Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTOUCH OUTREACH RESOURCE CTR: $10,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetFlanner House of Indianapolis: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPARKVIEW COOPERATIVE NURSERY SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSOMEBODY INC: $9,963 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTourism Tomorrow Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC: $7,883 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHarrison Center for the Arts Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBROAD RIPPLE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetEAGLE CREEK PARK FOUNDATION INC: $7,140 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetIVY ENDOWMENT INC: $7,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Indianapolis Foun…Lilly Endowment IncCentral Indiana Commu…Indianapolis Neighbor…United Way of Central…Eugene & Marilyn Glic…Allen Whitehill Clowe…Nina Mason Pulliam Ch…National Urban League…Lumina Foundation for…Nicholas H Noyes Jr M…Historic Landmarks Fo…
The Indianapolis Foundation IncIN54.9× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Indianapolis Neighborhood Housing Partnership Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · National Urban League Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Indianapolis Neighborhood Resource Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Indianapolis Neighborhood Resource Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Indianapolis Neighborhood Resource Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home