Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Indianapolis Neighborhood Resource Center Inc

INRC was established to provide training and technical assistance to neighborhood-based organizations and community development corporations throughout Marion County.

$386k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Community Improvement$297kReligion$138kArts & Culture$105kHousing & Shelter$91kHuman Services$56kRecreation & Sports$50kFood & Nutrition$38kHealth$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 25 grants below total $361,806 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $385,530 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $23,724 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $316k
$13,448
Median grant
1
States reached
$579k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hawthorne Social Service Association Inc$31,084
Fountain Fletcher District$26,429
Christian Park Community Garden$25,000
Near East Side Community Org$22,898
Tuxedo Park Baptist Church$22,450
Ben Davis Christian Church$21,461
Bates Hendricks Neighborhood Development Inc$15,476
Felege Hiywot$15,000
Englewood Neighborhood Assoc$15,000
1000 Words Inc$15,000
Aspire House$15,000
Rocky Ripple Community Assoc$14,976
Keystone Millersville$13,448
Drug Free Marion County$11,500
United Northeast CDC$10,815
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Felege Hiywot: $15k → 16%SOMEBODY INC: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$500k · 20 repeat orgs$386k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
27

Total granted

$500k
$263k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+3%

Still filing today

50%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Community ImprovementArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SN
    Southeast Neighborhood Development Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +22%
  • EC
    Englewood Community Development Corp
    2× · 2022–2024 · $22k · revenue +9%
  • DF
    Drug Free Marion County
    2× · 2022–2024 · $22k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • BC
    BIG CAR MEDIA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -40%
  • CC
    CROOKED CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +370%
  • HC
    HOLY CROSS NEIGHBORHOOD FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indianapolis Downtown Marketing Inc

Indianapolis Downtown Marketing, Inc. (IDMI) exists to improve downtown Indianapolis. IDMI focuses on marketing downtown businesses, destinations, organizations, activities and events.

2
Insight Development Corporation

Insight development corporation fosters low-income housing in and around indianapolis, indiana and the surrounding community.

Housing & Shelter
3
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
4
Groundwork Indy Inc

GWIs mission is to foster the sustained regeneration, improvement and management of the environment by developing community-based partnerships which empower people, businesses and organizations to promote environmental, economic & social…

Community Improvement
5
West Indianapolis Development Corp

To identify community resources, promote community assets and implement programs and activities that increase housing opportunities and improve the quality of life in West Indianapolis.

Community Improvement
6
Indianapolis Downtown Inc

Indianapolis Downtown, Inc. (IDI) exists to improve downtown Indianapolis. It is action-oriented and addresses critical issues that affect downtown growth and well-being. IDI was established to continue the economic, social, and cultural…

Community Improvement
7
Perry County Development Corp

Promote development in Perry County, Indiana

8
Indy Gateway Inc

Indy gateway was created for and its primary objective is to improve economic development and community development. the purposes include promoting economic growth, increasing opportunities for the revitalization of neighborhoods, and…

Community Improvement
9
Renew Indianapolis Inc F/K/a the Land Bank of Indianapolis Inc

To return vacant and abandoned property to productive use in the city of indianapolis, indiana

10
Innovation Connector Inc

To be east central indiana's primary sponsor bringing in technological firms.

Community Improvement
11
Intend Indiana Inc

Intend indiana connects people to opportunity and advances collaborative community development through financing and housing solutions.

Housing & Shelter
12
Noblesville Creates

Noblesville Creates cultivates arts resources to enrich the lives of everyone who experiences our community. We serve as the regional arts partner for the Indiana Arts Commission, serving seven counties in Central Indiana.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Broad Ripple Village Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chihuahua Rescue Indiana Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%15%<5yr15%11%5–10yr15%19%10–20yr13%28%20–35yr11%22%35–55yr26%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%18%<5yr15%9%5–10yr15%19%10–20yr13%25%20–35yr11%24%35–55yr26%6%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 18% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/56
the rest of the field
13%
1,009/7,775

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
12/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HAWTHORNE SOCIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION INC — $48,572 · OtherHAWTHORNE SOCIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION INCCHRISTIAN PARK COMMUNITY GARDEN INC — $38,469 · OtherCHRISTIAN PARK COMMUNITY GARDEN INCTUXEDO PARK BAPTIST CHURCH — $32,450 · OtherTUXEDO PARK BAPTIST CHURCHNEAR EAST SIDE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INC — $31,600 · OtherNEAR EAST SIDE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION INCBEN DAVIS CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $29,711 · OtherFOUNTAIN FLETCHER DISTRICT ASSOCIATION INC — $26,429 · OtherBATES-HENDRICKS NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT — $22,551 · Other1000 WORDS INC — $22,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR PARK — $19,848 · OtherNEW HOPE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH INC — $19,818 · OtherMAPLETON FALL CREEK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $19,654 · Other+26 more — $258,195 · Other+26 moreSoutheast Neighborhood Development Inc — $40,323 · Community ImprovementSoutheast Nei…MIDTOWN INDIANAPOLIS INC — $18,782 · Community ImprovementMIDTOWN INDIA…COMMUNITY ALLIANCE OF THE FAR EASTSIDE INC — $17,500 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ALL…CROOKED CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $15,204 · Community ImprovementCROOKED CREEK…Tourism Tomorrow Inc — $8,000 · Community ImprovementTourism Tomor…BROAD RIPPLE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC — $7,500 · Community ImprovementBROAD RIPPLE …BIG CAR MEDIA INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureFriends of Garfield Park Inc — $15,158 · Arts & CultureASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc — $10,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED NORTH EAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $28,315 · Housing & ShelterEnglewood Community Development Corp — $22,300 · Housing & ShelterBROOKSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterDrug Free Marion County — $21,500 · HealthThe Saturday Evening Post Society Inc — $16,694 · HealthINTOUCH OUTREACH RESOURCE CTR — $10,000 · HealthFelege Hiywot Center Inc — $15,000 · Human ServicesSOMEBODY INC — $9,963 · Human ServicesCHIHUAHUA RESCUE INDIANA INC — $10,000 · Animals
Other$569,797Community Improvement$107,309Arts & Culture$65,158Housing & Shelter$60,615Health$48,194Human Services$24,963Animals$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHAWTHORNE SOCIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION INC — $48,572 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSoutheast Neighborhood Development Inc — $40,323 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED NORTH EAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $28,315 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetFOUNTAIN FLETCHER DISTRICT ASSOCIATION INC — $26,429 over 1y, 77% of budgetBIG CAR MEDIA INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEnglewood Community Development Corp — $22,300 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDrug Free Marion County — $21,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetMAPLETON FALL CREEK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $19,654 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMIDTOWN INDIANAPOLIS INC — $18,782 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE OF THE FAR EASTSIDE INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Saturday Evening Post Society Inc — $16,694 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Garfield Park Inc — $15,158 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFelege Hiywot Center Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHistoric Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTOUCH OUTREACH RESOURCE CTR — $10,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetBROOKSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFlanner House of Indianapolis — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARKVIEW COOPERATIVE NURSERY SCHOOL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSOMEBODY INC — $9,963 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTourism Tomorrow Inc — $8,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC — $7,883 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHarrison Center for the Arts Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBROAD RIPPLE VILLAGE ASSOCIATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetEAGLE CREEK PARK FOUNDATION INC — $7,140 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetIVY ENDOWMENT INC — $7,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Indianapolis Foundation IncIN54.9× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Indianapolis Neighborhood Housing Partnership Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · National Urban League Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Indianapolis Neighborhood Resource Center Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph