Skip to content
Inatai Community Fund at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Inatai Community Fund

OUR MISSION IS TO TRANSFORM THE BALANCE OF POWER TO ENSURE EQUITY AND RACIAL JUSTICE ACROSS WASHINGTON AND BEYOND.

$850k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$575k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$4.4MPhilanthropy$850kCivil Rights$575kHuman Services$392kEducation$320kInternational$75kArts & Culture$50kFood & Nutrition$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $275k
  • $250k+1 grant · $575k
$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON IMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY NETWORK$575,000
STUDENT HEALTH OPTIONS$75,000
BRAVE WARRIOR PROJECT$75,000
NA'AH ILLAHEE FUND$75,000
INSPIRE DEVELOPMENT CENTERS$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $739k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOMAGE SENIOR SERVICES: $77k → 9%WASHINGTON IMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY NETWORK: $575k → 17%YWCA OF SPOKANE: $28k → 12%SOMALI HEALTH BOARD: $59k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 10 repeat orgs$4.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +120% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
22

Total granted

$1.2M
$3.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+120%
+11%

Still filing today

50%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $199k · revenue +129%
  • SC
    Seattle Center Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · $117k · revenue +40%
  • W
    WITHINREACH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $115k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • KH
    KFHPW HOLDINGS
    one grant, 2018 · $2.2M · revenue -89% · 34% of their budget
  • SS
    SENIOR SERVICES FOR SOUTH SOUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $291k · revenue +27%
  • WS
    WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
    one grant, 2018 · $245k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Association for Community Health

The mission of washington association for community health is to strengthen and advocate for washington's community health centers (chcs) as they build healthcare access, innovation, and value. the association provides training and…

—
2
Washington State Health Insurance Pool

Provide adequate health insurance coverage for washington residents who are denied health insurance for medical, high health risk or pre-existing conditions reasons.

—
3
Seattle Indian Health Board

Seattle indian health board is a community health center that provides health and human services to its patients, while specializing in the care of native people. we are recognized as a leader in the promotion of health improvement for…

Health
4
Whatcom Alliance for Healthcare Access C/O Chuckanut Health Fdn

Waha is a nonprofit organization based in bellingham, washington whose mission is to connect people to health care and facilitate transformation of the current system into one that improves health, reduces cost and improves the experience…

—
5
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
6
Washington School-Based Health Alliance

Advance and advocate for school-based health care, working with communities and partners to achieve equity in health and educational opportunity for children and youth statewide.

Health
7
Healthpoint

Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.

Health
8
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest

To provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

Health
9
Columbia Valley Community Health

The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.

Health
10
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
11
Project Access Northwest

Project Access Northwest provides low-income families access to medical, dental and Behavioral Health care so they can live a healthier and more productive life.

Health
12
Neighborcare Health

The organization is a community-based, non-profit agency that operates 31 medical, dental, and school-based health centers throughout seattle and provides services to over 57,008 people each year. our clinics are located throughout areas…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yakima Valley Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Student Health Options. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
17/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KFHPW HOLDINGS: $2,187,259 · OtherKFHPW HOLDINGSSENIOR SERVICES FOR SOUTH SOUND: $291,260 · OtherSENIOR SERVICES FOR SOUTH SOUNDSPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH: $267,000 · OtherSPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTHWASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $245,435 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH+13 more: $616,282 · Other+13 moreGRACE CLINIC: $250,000 · HealthGRACE CLINICINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $198,561 · HealthINTERNATIONAL COMMU…KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON: $182,916 · HealthKAISER FOUNDATION H…WASHINGTON STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT: $111,233 · HealthWASHINGTON STATE ME…American Indian Health Commission: $100,000 · HealthAmerican Indian Hea…SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $91,364 · HealthSEA MAR COMMUNITY H…STUDENT HEALTH OPTIONS: $75,000 · HealthSTUDENT HEALTH OPTI…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $57,570 · HealthWASHINGTON HEALTHCARE ACCESS ALLIANCE: $50,000 · HealthGLOBAL TO LOCAL HEALTH INITIATIVE: $39,782 · Health+2 more: $37,000 · HealthYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $850,000 · PhilanthropyYAKIMA VALLEY …WASHINGTON IMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY NETWORK: $575,000 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON I…SENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $77,204 · Human ServicesSENIOR SERVI…SOMALI HEALTH BOARD: $58,680 · Human ServicesSOMALI HEALT…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $28,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $167,608 · EducationSeattle Center Foundation: $117,163 · Arts & CultureAFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CULTURAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY: $50,000 · Arts & CultureNa'ah Illahee Fund: $75,000 · International
Other$3,607,236Health$1,193,426Philanthropy$850,000Human Services$738,884Education$167,608Arts & Culture$167,163International$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKFHPW HOLDINGS: $2,187,259 over 1y, 34% of budgetYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $850,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetWASHINGTON IMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY NETWORK: $575,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES FOR SOUTH SOUND: $291,260 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetGRACE CLINIC: $250,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES: $198,561 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON: $182,916 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $167,608 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWITHINREACH: $114,565 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT: $111,233 over 1y, 11% of budgetSEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $91,364 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY: $77,204 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNa'ah Illahee Fund: $75,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSTUDENT HEALTH OPTIONS: $75,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetTHE BRAVE WARRIOR PROJECT: $75,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSOMALI HEALTH BOARD: $58,680 over 1y, 14% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $57,570 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORT ANGELES FOOD BANK: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDOWNTOWN PASCO DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: $50,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetINSPIRE DEVELOPMENT CENTERS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CULTURAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetGLOBAL TO LOCAL HEALTH INITIATIVE: $39,782 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $28,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Inland Northwest: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVANESSA BEHAN: $23,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES: $22,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe ISAAC Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inatai FoundationKaiser Foundation Hea…Seattle FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…Delta Dental of Washi…United Way of King Co…Providence Health & S…School's Out Washingt…Gates FoundationThrive WashingtonMulticare Health Syst…Puget Sound Energy Fo…
Inatai FoundationWA35.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inatai Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington · Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Delta Dental of Washington · United Way of King County · Providence Health & Services - Washington · School's Out Washington · Gates Foundation · Thrive Washington · Multicare Health System · Puget Sound Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Inatai Community Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Inatai Community Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Inatai Community Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Inatai Community Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Inatai’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home