· Private foundation
Inatai Community Fund
OUR MISSION IS TO TRANSFORM THE BALANCE OF POWER TO ENSURE EQUITY AND RACIAL JUSTICE ACROSS WASHINGTON AND BEYOND.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k4 grants · $275k
- $250k+1 grant · $575k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WASHINGTON IMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY NETWORK | $575,000 |
| STUDENT HEALTH OPTIONS | $75,000 |
| BRAVE WARRIOR PROJECT | $75,000 |
| NA'AH ILLAHEE FUND | $75,000 |
| INSPIRE DEVELOPMENT CENTERS | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $739k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +120% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $850k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ICINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES2× · 2017–2018 · $199k · revenue +129%
- SCSeattle Center Foundation2× · 2017–2018 · $117k · revenue +40%
- WWITHINREACH2× · 2017–2018 · $115k · revenue +129%
Funded once
- KHKFHPW HOLDINGSone grant, 2018 · $2.2M · revenue -89% · 34% of their budget
- SSSENIOR SERVICES FOR SOUTH SOUNDgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $291k · revenue +27%
- WSWASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHone grant, 2018 · $245k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of washington association for community health is to strengthen and advocate for washington's community health centers (chcs) as they build healthcare access, innovation, and value. the association provides training and…
Provide adequate health insurance coverage for washington residents who are denied health insurance for medical, high health risk or pre-existing conditions reasons.
Seattle indian health board is a community health center that provides health and human services to its patients, while specializing in the care of native people. we are recognized as a leader in the promotion of health improvement for…
Waha is a nonprofit organization based in bellingham, washington whose mission is to connect people to health care and facilitate transformation of the current system into one that improves health, reduces cost and improves the experience…
Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.
Advance and advocate for school-based health care, working with communities and partners to achieve equity in health and educational opportunity for children and youth statewide.
Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.
To provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.
The mission of columbia valley community health is partnering to achieve optimal health and wellness with compassion and respect for all.
Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…
Project Access Northwest provides low-income families access to medical, dental and Behavioral Health care so they can live a healthier and more productive life.
The organization is a community-based, non-profit agency that operates 31 medical, dental, and school-based health centers throughout seattle and provides services to over 57,008 people each year. our clinics are located throughout areas…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yakima Valley Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Student Health Options. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KFHPW HOLDINGS ↗
- Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON IMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES FOR SOUTH SOUND ↗
- Who funds GRACE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Seattle Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds WITHINREACH ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH CARE IMPROVEMENT ↗
- Who funds American Indian Health Commission ↗
- Who funds SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds STUDENT HEALTH OPTIONS ↗
- Who funds THE BRAVE WARRIOR PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Na'ah Illahee Fund ↗
- Who funds SOMALI HEALTH BOARD ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON HEALTHCARE ACCESS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds INSPIRE DEVELOPMENT CENTERS ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CULTURAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN PASCO DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds PORT ANGELES FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL TO LOCAL HEALTH INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of the Inland Northwest ↗
- Who funds VANESSA BEHAN ↗
- Who funds DAYBREAK YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds The ISAAC Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inatai Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington · Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Delta Dental of Washington · United Way of King County · Providence Health & Services - Washington · School's Out Washington · Gates Foundation · Thrive Washington · Multicare Health System · Puget Sound Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Inatai Community Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Inatai Community Fund?
Find your warmest path to Inatai Community Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.