Skip to content
Inam & Fakhra Haq Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Inam & Fakhra Haq Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$277k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$133k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$417kReligion$373kEducation$40kHuman Services$24kPhilanthropy$23kHealth$20kPublic Benefit$14kCivil Rights$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $201k
$3,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSLIM MAIJILIS OF STATEN ISLAND$132,500
ILM O ADAB$68,000
AGOSH ALKHIDMAT USA$37,300
Individual grant recipient$9,000
PAKISTAN CHILDREN RELIEF$5,500
FRIENDS MAYO HOSPITAL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,849
NOORUDDIN FOUNDATION$3,500
PAKISTANI CIVIC ASSOCIATION$3,000
MINHAJ WELFARE FOUNDATION$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,800
WNYC$1,100
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ALL ABOUT USA INC$1,000
HILLTOP SECURITIES INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WAFA House: $3k → 12%Al-Mustafa Charitable Trust: $10k → 6%Al-Mustafa Charitable Trust: $6k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Inam & Fakhra Haq Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Inam & Fakhra Haq Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 11 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +112% since the first grant, against +68% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
16

Total granted

$1.0M
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+112%
+68%

Still filing today

18%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IO
    ILM O ADAB INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $485k · revenue +112% · 89% of their budget
  • MM
    MUSLIM MAJLIS OF STATEN ISLAND INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $402k
  • AP
    American Pakistani Education Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $32k

Funded once

  • IC
    Islamic Center of Medford
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • KE
    King Edward Medical College Endowment
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rehmat Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Altaf & Nasreen Godil Foundation
Philanthropy
3
The Noor Foundation
Philanthropy
4
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
5
Darul Arqam
Religion
6
Alsajdah Foundation
Religion
7
Allah Wale Trust Inc

To provide food and shelter to the poor people of pakistan

Food & Nutrition
8
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
9
Alnoor Foundation
Religion
10
Institute of Infection Prevention and Control

Our mission is to reduce the burden of infectious and communicable diseases in Pakistan through capacity building of healthcare providers, and by educating people about preventive and precautionary mechanisms. We strive to break the chain…

Health
11
Nasrulla Haque Foundation
—
12
Shakir Charitable Trust
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wafa House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Al Mustafa Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ILM O ADAB INC: $485,078 · EducationILM O ADAB INCAGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED: $134,650 · EducationAGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED+1 more: $5,500 · EducationMUSLIM MAJLIS OF STATEN ISLAND INC: $402,000 · OtherMUSLIM MAJLIS OF STATEN ISLAND INCAmerican Pakistani Education Foundation: $32,000 · OtherAmerican Pakistani Education Foundation+25 more: $113,572 · Other+25 moreAl Mustafa Charitable Trust: $15,500 · Human ServicesWAFA HOUSE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OFPAKISTANI-DESCENT OF NORTH AMERICA: $2,500 · Community ImprovementMUSLIM ADVOCATES: $2,500 · Civil RightsCOMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEF: $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $1,100 · Arts & Culture
Education$625,228Other$547,572Human Services$18,000Community Improvement$2,500Civil Rights$2,500Public Safety & Disaster$2,000Arts & Culture$1,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetILM O ADAB INC: $485,078 over 6y, 89% of budgetAGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED: $134,650 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetAl Mustafa Charitable Trust: $15,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWAFA HOUSE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMUSLIM ADVOCATES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEF: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSLIM FEDERATION OF NEW JERSEY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ILM O ADAB INC ↗
  • Who funds AGHOSH AL-KHIDMAT USA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Al Mustafa Charitable Trust ↗
  • Who funds PAKISTAN CHILDREN RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds WAFA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS OFPAKISTANI-DESCENT OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MUSLIM ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE DISASTER RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOSPITALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSLIM FEDERATION OF NEW JERSEY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC8.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Inam & Fakhra Haq Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Inam & Fakhra Haq Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 51%
  • Wafa House Inc: 51% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Inam & Fakhra Haq Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Inam & Fakhra Haq Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Inam & Fakhra Haq Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home