Skip to content

· Public charity

In Search of a Cure

Provision of funding to various organization exempt under section 501(c)(3) primarily to organizations active in the treatment of,and finding a cure for, autism and to provide financial support for families who have children in need.

$336k
Granted FY2021
4
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$234k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Human Services$1.1MReligion$199kRecreation & Sports$198kHealth$112kEmployment$55kPhilanthropy$25kArts & Culture$15kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2021 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $305,245, the rows itemized in this filing. The $336,388 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,143 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $71k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $234k
$31,275
Median grant
1
States reached
$117k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTER SEALS$234,000
MISERICORDIA$31,275
FOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION$24,970
LITTLE FRIENDS$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BRAVEHEARTS: $5k → 6%LITTLE FRIENDS: $48k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $25k → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $15k → 7%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 7 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$1.6M
$210k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+6%

Still filing today

57%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    EASTER SEALS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.0M · revenue -10%
  • M
    MISERICORDIA
    6× · 2017–2022 · $199k
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS
    2× · 2017–2019 · $168k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $90k
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOISgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +67%
  • NS
    NAVY SAFE HARBOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Special Olympics Wisconsin Inc

The mission of special olympics wisconsin, inc. is to provide year-round sports training and athletic competition in a variety of olympic-type sports for children and adults with intellectual disabilities, giving them continuing…

Recreation & Sports
2
Easter Seals Southern California Inc

Easter seals southern ca provides services that empower individuals with disabilities and special needs at all stages of life. autism services, independent living services, social skills support, early childhood education services, and…

—
3
Nassau Suffolk Services for the Autistic Inc

Nassau suffolk services for the autistic (nssa) offers hope to people with autism and their families by providing high quality life-long support through services which enable people with autism to function better in everday life. nssa…

Health
4
Autism Society of America Inc

The autism society envisions individuals and families living with autism are able to maximize their quality of life, are treated with the highest level of dignity, and live in a society in which their talents and skills are appreciated and…

—
5
Autism Services Inc

To provide cost-effective residential, social, intellectual, physical and vocational services to individuals with autism in group homes and in home support.

—
6
Special Olympics Missouri Inc

Through year-round sports and training, individuals with intellectual disabilities are given the chance to gain confidence, seek opportunities to improve their physical fitness, demonstrate pride, and participate in their communities.

—
7
Easter Seals Metropolitan Chicago Inc

Easter seals metropolitan chicago, inc. transforms the lives of early learners and individuals of all abilities through access to expert educational, family and community services.

Health
8
Special Olympics Michigan Inc

The special olympics movement uses sport as a vehicle for acceptance, respect, inclusion, dignity, and joy. we provide year-round sports training and competition for children and adults with intellectual disabilities.

Recreation & Sports
9
Spectrum for Living Development Inc

To enable individuals who have developmental and/or physical disabilities to have the opportunity to attain their highest level of skills, purpose and independence.

Human Services
10
Indiana Special Olympics Inc

Provide olympic sports training/competition for individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Recreation & Sports
11
Autism Services Association Inc

Provides community employment and awareness, vocational and developmental skills, to young adults and adults with autism and other developmental disabilities in central and eastern massachusetts. transportation services are also provided.…

—
12
Lifeworks Incorporated

Lifeworks provides education, jobs and homes for persons with developmental disabilities empowering them to lead meaningful lives within the community. our guiding principles ensure that lifeworks staff and volunteers strive to create and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Friends Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dean Anthony Katsaros Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTER SEALS INC: $1,028,863 · OtherEASTER SEALS INCMISERICORDIA: $199,281 · OtherMISERICORDIASPECIAL OLYMPICS: $168,326 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICSIndividual grant recipient: $89,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEAMSTERS LOCAL 299 COMMUNITY SERVICE: $55,000 · Other+5 more: $69,775 · OtherFOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION: $84,295 · PhilanthropyNAVY SAFE HARBOR FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyLITTLE FRIENDS INC: $87,633 · Human ServicesSHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesMARCH OF DIMES INC: $18,000 · HealthTEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $5,000 · HealthDEAN ANTHONY KATSAROS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education
Other$1,610,945Philanthropy$109,295Human Services$98,133Health$23,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $1,028,863 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLITTLE FRIENDS INC: $87,633 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION: $84,295 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS: $29,775 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNAVY SAFE HARBOR FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDEAN ANTHONY KATSAROS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SAFE HARBOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds DEAN ANTHONY KATSAROS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAVEHEARTS THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization In Search of a Cure funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from In Search of a Cure. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to In Search of a Cure?

    Find your warmest path to In Search of a Cure through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $38k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on In Search of a Cure’s filings →

    More from the funding graph