Skip to content

Illinois · Public charity

In Search of a Cure

Provision of funding to various organization exempt under section 501(c)(3) primarily to organizations active in the treatment of,and finding a cure for, autism and to provide financial support for families who have children in need.

$336k
Granted FY2021
4
Itemized grants FY2021
4
Organizations funded FY2021
0%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2021
$305k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2021
$31,275
Largest grant, FY2021
$234,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 9
FY2017 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
1
Total assets, FY2021
$117k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 0% of the organizations In Search of a Cure funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20214$305k0%
FY20206$388k33%
FY20199$349k33%
FY20188$394k50%
FY20179$415kn/a
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Human Services$1.1MReligion$199kRecreation & Sports$198kHealth$112kEmployment$55kPhilanthropy$25kArts & Culture$15kEducation$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($552k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget In Search of a Cure supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEaster Seals Inc: $1,028,863 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLittle Friends Inc: $87,633 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFor Autistic Kids Foundation: $84,295 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetSpecial Olympics Illinois: $29,775 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNavy Safe Harbor Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMarch of Dimes Inc: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDean Anthony Katsaros Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetShore Community Services Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTeamsters Local 25 Autism Fund Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBravehearts Therapeutic Riding and Educational Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare In Search of a Cure with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to In Search of a Cure?

Find your warmest path to In Search of a Cure through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About In Search of a Cure

How much does In Search of a Cure give?
In Search of a Cure reported 4 itemized grants totaling $305,245, out of $336,388 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 9 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2021.
What does In Search of a Cure fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2021, its largest causes are Human Services (61%), Religion (11%), Recreation & Sports (11%).
Who are In Search of a Cure's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2021: Easter Seals Inc ($1.0M), Little Friends Inc ($88k), For Autistic Kids Foundation ($84k).
Does In Search of a Cure fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as In Search of a Cure?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is In Search of a Cure based?
In Search of a Cure is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $38k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on In Search of a Cure’s filings →

More from the funding graph