Skip to content

· Private foundation

In Between Days Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$232k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$124k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

85% of In Between Days Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to University Impact, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year In Between Days Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $232k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’19
10
’20
10
’21
4
’22
7
’23
4
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.1MEducation$639kCommunity Improvement$25kHuman Services$8kYouth Development$3kArts & Culture$2kHealth$2kAnimals$1k
02FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k8 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $188k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$124,375
DRAPER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$63,778
SOUTH VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$25,000
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY$8,000
DAVIS TECHNICAL COLLEGE$3,000
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,205
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$1,000
BRIGHAM YOUN UNIVERSITY IDAHO$1,000
UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY$1,000
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
NY
OR
CA
UT
CO
MO
AZ
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 14 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$1.4M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+26%

Still filing today

21%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’25
EducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CORNER CANYON TRAILS
    6× · 2019–2025 · $900k · revenue -35% · 44% of their budget
  • UH
    UTAH HIGH SCHOOL CYCLING LEAGUE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $230k · revenue +100%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
    5× · 2020–2025 · $188k

Funded once

  • AA
    ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAHgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +106%
  • LE
    LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEMgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +44%
  • MM
    MOTOR MECHANICS INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
6
Western Athletic Conference

The conference is committed to providing student-athletes an exemplary university experience - both on and off the field of play. with high standards of integrity at the core of our athletic and academic excellences, our goal is to unlock…

Recreation & Sports
7
University of Denver

The university of denver (du) is a higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees - the mission of the university of denver is to promote learning by engaging with students (continued on schedule o)in…

Education
8
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
9
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
10
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Corner Canyon Trails. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CORNER CANYON TRAILS: $900,338 · PhilanthropyCORNER CANYON TRAILSUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $187,613 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $33,831 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSI…South Valley Chamber: $25,000 · OtherSouth Valley ChamberSOUTH VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $25,000 · OtherSOUTH VALLEY CHAMBER O…UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · Other+23 more: $69,273 · Other+23 moreUniversity Impact: $308,245 · EducationUniversity Impact+4 more: $9,655 · EducationUTAH HIGH SCHOOL CYCLING LEAGUE: $229,655 · Recreation & SportsUTAH HIGH SCHO…ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $8,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$900,338Other$352,717Education$317,900Recreation & Sports$229,655Human Services$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORNER CANYON TRAILS: $900,338 over 6y, 44% of budgetUTAH HIGH SCHOOL CYCLING LEAGUE: $229,655 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetSouth Valley Chamber: $25,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Utah: $1,655 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORNER CANYON TRAILS ↗
  • Who funds University Impact ↗
  • Who funds UTAH HIGH SCHOOL CYCLING LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds South Valley Chamber ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH ↗
  • Who funds LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Utah ↗
  • Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George S and Dolores Dore Eccles FoundationUT15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Ihc Health Services Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization In Between Days Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from In Between Days Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on In Between Days’ filings →

    More from the funding graph