Skip to content

· Public charity

Impactassetsinc

The mission of this corporation is to be the preeminent partner for impact investing and charitable giving, helping us all achieve our greatest impact.

$262M
Granted FY2023
2,654
Grants FY2023
52
States reached
$12M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

52% of Impactassetsinc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2451 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Impactassetsinc named its own grantees at scale: 2365 organizations, $249M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

697
’17
866
’18
1228
’19
1847
’20
2009
’21
2190
’22
2365
’23
2451
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$456MHealth$158MInternational$138MEnvironment$131MEducation$127MCommunity Improvement$117MCivil Rights$93MHuman Services$76MOther$0
02FY2023 · 2654 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2,654 grants below total $249,245,550, the rows itemized in this filing. The $262,237,083 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,991,533 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k418 grants · $2.9M
  • $10k–50k1322 grants · $25M
  • $50k–250k687 grants · $69M
  • $250k+227 grants · $152M
$23,812
Median grant
52
States reached
$3.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLOBALGIVING$11,987,424
EAST BAY MEDITATION CENTER$5,456,000
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION$3,000,000
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$2,847,280
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC$2,780,810
IGIFTFUND$2,738,491
ATMOS LTD$2,500,000
JUBILEE GIFT GALAXY INC$2,370,000
THRESHOLD FOUNDATION$2,101,000
POSSIBILITY LABS$2,002,500
HELP KITCHEN$2,000,000
MENOMINI YOU$2,000,000
CLEAN FUTURE FORUM INC$1,982,221
VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC$1,975,000
FOUNDATION FOR CIVIC LEADERSHIP$1,900,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $63.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTHEAST NATIVE NETWORK OF KINSHIP AND HEALING INCORPORATED: $1.1M → 8%THE CRYSTAL DREAMS FOUNDATION: $888k → 10%NPX CHARITABLE INC: $500k → 10%BAHIA FOUNDATION: $1.7M → 15%EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $4.0M → 18%COLABORATIVA LA MILPA FBO PODER EMMA: $582k → 12%YOUNG MEN CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $600k → 15%REALIZE IMPACT: $819k → 10%CITY DIBS (BRIOXY): $500k → 19%NPX CHARITABLE INC: $500k → 10%FRIENDS OF TAVARUA: $2.6M → 14%PURE CHARITY: $773k → 8%EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE FBO INDIGENOUS-LED ECOVILLAGE COMMUNITY: $651k → 18%COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $500k → 8%REALIZE IMPACT FBO DELTA40 VENTURE STUDIO CORPORATION: $750k → 10%AYUDANDO LATINOS A SOAR (ALAS): $650k → 7%PURE CHARITY: $517k → 8%EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE FBO INDIGENOUS-LED ECOVILLAGE COMMUNITY: $525k → 18%REALIZE IMPACT: $538k → 10%PRIME COALITION INC: $1.0M → 8%REALIZE IMPACT: $452k → 10%SOCIAL FINANCE INC: $1.0M → 16%WORLD PULSE VOICES: $670k → 12%CHOOSE LOVE INC: $585k → 17%UNITED WOMEN OF EAST AFRICA (UWEAST): $500k → 11%THE COMMON MARKET: $450k → 22%RED HOOK INITIATIVE INC: $500k → 20%LC AND LILLIE COX HAVEN OF HOPE FBO JUST BE: $450k → 9%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $630k → 14%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $625k → 14%SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND FBO MCINTOSH SEED: $640k → 13%POSSIBILITY LABS: $2.0M → 10%POSSIBILITY LABS FBO JUST FUTURES PBC: $2.0M → 10%MERIT AMERICA: $750k → 14%POSSIBILITY LABS FBO GROUNDCOVER: $975k → 10%POSSIBILITY LABS: $844k → 10%POSSIBILITY LABS FBO THE LUNAR PROJECT: $700k → 10%POSSIBILITY LABS FBO THE GUILD: $600k → 10%MERIT AMERICA: $450k → 14%POSSIBILITY LABS FBO THE GUILD: $551k → 10%THE GROWING SEASON-ILLINOIS INC: $500k → 14%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $495k → 10%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $475k → 10%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT (ASAP): $450k → 17%THE ACCOMPLIS COLLECTIVE INC: $2.4M → 17%TIDES CENTER FBO VOICES FOR PROGRESS ED FUND: $667k → 14%MERIT AMERICA: $500k → 14%MERIT AMERICA: $500k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Impactassetsinc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Impactassetsinclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$873M · 1511 repeat orgs$232M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

1511 repeat relationships: 1121 still active in FY2023, 390 since wound down; 227 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1511
153

Total granted

$873M
$136M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
0%

Still filing today

90%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $34M · revenue +34%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR CIVIC LEADERSHIP INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $18M · revenue +244% · 92% of their budget
  • BF
    BLACK FARMER FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $9.9M · revenue +806% · 66% of their budget

Funded once

  • B
    BAYADAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $92M · revenue +705%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2019 · $3.2M
  • GR
    GATHERING ROOTS WELLNESS DBA SACRED LAND COLLECTIVE
    one grant, 2021 · $2.8M · revenue -83% · 71% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
CarbonPlan

We work collaboratively to build open tools and resources for the evaluation and deployment of robust climate programs. We share analyses through public communication and collaboration with journalists in order to foster effective climate…

Environment
2
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

Increase the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet.

Philanthropy
3
New Roots Institute

New Roots Institute is a nonprofit empowering the next generation with knowledge and training to end factory farming.

Food & Nutrition
4
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
5
Witness Inc

Witness helps people use video and technology to protect and defend human rights. the organization operates globally. witness' global team designs solutions, provides guidance, and co-develops strategies that enable human rights defenders…

International
6
United for a Fair Economy Inc

United for a Fair Economy challenges the concentration of wealth and power by using popular economics education, trainings and creative communications to support social movements working for a resilient, sustainable and equitable economy.

Social Science
7
International Peace Institute Inc

The international peace institute is an independent, non-profit organization working to strengthen inclusive multilateralism for a more peaceful and sustainable planet. through its research, convening, and strategic advising, ipi provides…

International
8
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues.

Environment
9
Work on Climate

Supporting industry transformation towards climate-positive and regenerative practices and business models by helping climate-motivated professionals lead such transformation through their careers, company-building, and intrapreneurship.

Environment
10
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International

A people-centered approach to the conservation of gorillas and their habitats in Africa

—
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

the organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the UCSF Foundation.

Education
12
World Resources Institute

To create change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is As You Sow; the most unlike its peers is Ashtalakshmi Temple. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

1825 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1825 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

253
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
461
Early backer (in before they grew)
1796/1825
Grantees still filing
1193/1825
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $171,606,365 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTGiveClear Foundation: $86,038,909 · PhilanthropyGiveClear FoundationTIDES FOUNDATION: $15,219,051 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FUND: $13,734,179 · Philanthropy+28 more: $97,305,495 · Philanthropy+28 moreBAYADA: $91,730,857 · HealthBAYADAPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $7,740,412 · HealthPLANNED PAR…+2 more: $4,197,520 · HealthFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $36,464,317 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY I…BLACK FARMER FUND INC: $9,944,250 · Community ImprovementBLACK FARM…CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC: $5,434,850 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR…VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $5,100,500 · Community ImprovementVIRGINIA O…COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $4,155,000 · Community ImprovementNEW PROFIT INC: $3,500,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON FUTURE: $3,466,000 · Community ImprovementTHE WORKING WORLD INC: $3,460,000 · Community ImprovementMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER: $3,400,600 · Community ImprovementEVERYDAY PEOPLE FOR CHANGE INC: $3,286,500 · Community ImprovementThe Big We: $3,230,000 · Community Improvement+7 more: $13,644,800 · Community Improvement+7 moreFOUNDATION FOR CIVIC LEADERSHIP INC: $17,600,000 · EducationFOUNDATION…DEFENDING DEMOCRACY TOGETHER INSTITUTE: $9,050,000 · EducationDEFENDING …SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $7,751,805 · EducationSOCIAL GOO…Sustainable Economies Law Center: $6,150,967 · EducationSustainabl…THE SCHOTT FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION: $5,047,000 · EducationTHE SCHOTT…MENOMINI YOU INC: $4,560,500 · EducationNew York University: $3,190,200 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $3,155,000 · Education+20 more: $36,350,588 · Education+20 moreGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $33,795,821 · InternationalGLOBALGIV…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,333,154 · InternationalUNITED ST…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,476,741 · InternationalMEDECINS …ROOT CAPITAL INC: $3,566,878 · InternationalTHRESHOLD FOUNDATION: $3,489,861 · InternationalACUMEN FUND INC: $3,428,082 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $3,029,655 · InternationalTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $2,824,900 · International+14 more: $23,252,479 · International+14 moreAnpo Inc: $22,500,000 · Human ServicesPOSSIBILITY LABS: $8,608,500 · Human ServicesEKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $6,022,500 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $5,897,019 · Human ServicesRealize Impact: $3,613,262 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $3,262,330 · Human Services+18 more: $31,909,001 · Human ServicesEAST BAY MEDITATION CENTER: $8,390,700 · OtherATMOS LTD: $10,813,827 · OtherATMOS LTDNEW VENTURE FUND: $10,311,944 · OtherClean Future Forum Inc: $7,008,335 · OtherSHELTERWOOD COLLECTIVE: $6,851,500 · OtherNEO Philanthropy Inc: $7,083,000 · Other+66 more: $143,019,948 · Other+66 more
Philanthropy$383,903,999Health$103,668,789Community Improvement$95,086,817Education$92,856,060International$83,197,571Human Services$81,812,612Other$193,479,254

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $171,606,365 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetGiveClear Foundation: $86,038,909 over 1y, 40% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $36,464,317 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $33,795,821 over 8y, 10% of budgetAnpo Inc: $22,500,000 over 1y, 99% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CIVIC LEADERSHIP INC: $17,600,000 over 8y, 92% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $15,219,051 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $13,734,179 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $10,820,762 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetATMOS LTD: $10,813,827 over 4y, 96% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $10,753,009 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $10,311,944 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetBLACK FARMER FUND INC: $9,944,250 over 5y, 66% of budgetDEFENDING DEMOCRACY TOGETHER INSTITUTE: $9,050,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetPOSSIBILITY LABS: $8,608,500 over 4y, 12% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $7,751,805 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $7,740,412 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $7,391,486 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $7,083,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetClean Future Forum Inc: $7,008,335 over 4y, 19% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $6,995,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $6,856,069 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSHELTERWOOD COLLECTIVE: $6,851,500 over 4y, 82% of budgetTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND: $6,430,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJubilee Gift Galaxy Inc: $6,175,556 over 3y, 80% of budgetSustainable Economies Law Center: $6,150,967 over 6y, 26% of budgetEKVNV YEFOLECVLKE: $6,022,500 over 6y, 25% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $5,897,019 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC: $5,434,850 over 7y, 26% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,333,154 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $5,100,500 over 4y, 17% of budgetPLENTIFUL: $5,100,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetTHE SCHOTT FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION: $5,047,000 over 4y, 40% of budgetAMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL: $4,898,830 over 7y, 11% of budgetMENOMINI YOU INC: $4,560,500 over 3y, 58% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,476,741 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $4,155,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $3,968,554 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM: $3,845,300 over 6y, 22% of budgetON BEING PROJECT: $3,650,000 over 3y, 85% of budgetRealize Impact: $3,613,262 over 7y, 32% of budgetROOT CAPITAL INC: $3,566,878 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetNEW PROFIT INC: $3,500,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetTHRESHOLD FOUNDATION: $3,489,861 over 8y, 35% of budgetCOMMON FUTURE: $3,466,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetTHE WORKING WORLD INC: $3,460,000 over 8y, 20% of budgetACUMEN FUND INC: $3,428,082 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetMOVEMENT STRATEGY CENTER: $3,400,600 over 7y, 4.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds BAYADA ↗
  • Who funds GiveClear Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Anpo Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CIVIC LEADERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ATMOS LTD ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds BLACK FARMER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds DEFENDING DEMOCRACY TOGETHER INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds POSSIBILITY LABS ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds Clean Future Forum Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERWOOD COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND ↗
  • Who funds Jubilee Gift Galaxy Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sustainable Economies Law Center ↗
  • Who funds EKVNV YEFOLECVLKE ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC ↗
  • Who funds PLENTIFUL ↗
  • Who funds THE SCHOTT FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds MENOMINI YOU INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Libra FoundationCA59.3× affinity68 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Libra Foundation · Women Donors Network · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Possibility Labs · Solidaire Network Inc · Willow Redistribution Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · General Service Foundation · Threshold Foundation · Flock Inc · Windward Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Impactassetsinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Impactassetsinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 210%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
  • Northeast Native Network of Kinship and: 44% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Social Finance Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Jobs for the Future Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Root Capital Inc: 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
  • Rider University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
21get no government money at all
41report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Impactassetsinc’s filings →

More from the funding graph