Skip to content
Impact Giving at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Impact Giving

Provide grants to other exempt organizations based upon an analysis of applications.

$201k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$251kInternational$161kHousing & Shelter$155kHealth$121kYouth Development$114kCrime & Legal$85kHuman Services$79kPhilanthropy$79kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $165,640, the rows itemized in this filing. The $201,060 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,420 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$241k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOLUTIONS FOR URBAN AGRICULTURE$40,000
CONCERN AMERICA$30,000
FOOD FINDERS$30,000
SURF & TURF THERAPY$27,500
INTERNATIONAL ORPHAN CARE$20,000
NEW DIRECTIONS FOR WOMEN$18,140
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ELDER HELP OF SAN DIEGO: $15k → 11%WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $25k → 11%EVERFREE: $20k → 10%WISEPLACE: $36k → 10%WISEPLACE: $25k → 10%WISEPLACE: $20k → 10%WITH MY OWN TWO HANDS: $14k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$628k · 11 repeat orgs$603k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +512% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
22

Total granted

$628k
$527k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+512%
+19%

Still filing today

64%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionCrime & LegalCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BK
    Brackens Kitchen Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $156k · revenue +943%
  • W
    WISEPLACE
    3× · 2017–2022 · $81k · revenue +512%
  • SF
    SOLUTIONS FOR URBAN AGRICULTURE
    2× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +810% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • V
    VARIOUS
    one grant, 2023 · $44k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • GA
    GIVE A CHILD A LIFE
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Transition House

Transition House is dedicated to the solution of family homelessness in the Santa Barbara community. Capable and motivated families with children are offered life tools and respectful, non-sectarian residential services designed to…

Housing & Shelter
2
Womens Recovery ServicesA Unique Place

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction for women in a safe residential setting, allowing them and their young children to live together while learning the life skills necessary to become strong, responsible contributors in their…

—
3
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
4
Friendly Hand Foundation Dba Friendly House

At Friendly House, our mission is to inspire and empower women of all gender experiences, on their journey to overcoming substance use disorders and mental health challenges. Our program offers a blend of clinical expertise, cultural…

Health
5
Seven Sisters International

Seven Sisters International provides rehabilitative care to girls who have been rescued from trafficking and sexual abuse by offering medical and psychological services, social work, education, life skills training, job preparation, and…

Human Services
6
Orphaned Starfish Foundation Inc

The Orphaned Starfish Foundation creates lasting change in the lives of orphans throughout Latin America and the world by helping them develop vocational skills. We believe enabling them with these skills allows them to permanently…

Human Services
7
Laurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor

The mission of Laurel House (dba Hope Harbor) is providing a home for teens in crisis, transforming lives, and strengthening families. Laurel House has the only long-term youth shelters in Orange County, CA for runaway, homeless and…

—
8
Would-Works Inc

At Would Works, we are committed to help youth with barriers to employment to heal, learn new skills, grow their confidence and prepare for their next opportunities, by providing paid, creative, hands-on woodworking training in a…

Human Services
9
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
10
Hopeland

Hopeland pioneers innovative solutions and builds new partnerships to prevent family separation, reunify children who are separated from their families, and mobilize a movement of families to support children who are growing up outside of…

Human Services
11
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
12
Wayfinder Family Services

The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families Forward; the most unlike its peers is Lotus Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Brackens Kitchen Inc: $155,750 · OtherBrackens Kitchen IncVARIOUS: $44,034 · OtherVARIOUSBOURKE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $44,000 · OtherBOURKE FAMILY FOUNDATIONGIRLS INC OF ORANGE COUNTY: $40,000 · OtherGIRLS INC OF ORANGE COUNTYSTAND UP FOR KIDS: $34,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherGIVE A CHILD A LIFE: $30,000 · OtherFAMILIES FORWARD: $29,300 · OtherREWRITTEN: $28,000 · OtherSurf and Turf Therapy: $27,500 · OtherSIGHTLIFE: $25,000 · OtherPATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $25,000 · OtherStandUp for Kids: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $23,000 · Other+6 more: $115,340 · Other+6 moreWISEPLACE: $81,100 · Human ServicesWISEPLACEWARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesWARRIOR FOUNDA…Willow International Everfree: $20,000 · Human ServicesWillow Interna…ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $15,000 · Human ServicesELDERHELP OF S…WITH MY OWN TWO HANDS FOUNDATION: $14,000 · Human ServicesWITH MY OWN TW…CONCERN AMERICA: $60,000 · InternationalCONCERN AMER…INTERNATIONAL ORPHAN CARE: $30,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONA…GIVING CHILDREN HOPE: $25,000 · InternationalGIVING CHILD…THE SAMBURU PROJECT INC: $24,400 · InternationalTHE SAMBURU …SOLUTIONS FOR URBAN AGRICULTURE: $65,150 · Food & NutritionFOOD FINDERS INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionCourt Appointed Special Advocates: $55,000 · Civil RightsCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $30,000 · Civil RightsORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Crime & LegalSAVE OUR YOUTH SOY: $15,000 · Crime & LegalTHE DRAGON KIM FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Philanthropy
Other$675,924Human Services$155,100International$139,400Food & Nutrition$95,150Civil Rights$85,000Crime & Legal$45,000Philanthropy$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBrackens Kitchen Inc: $155,750 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetWISEPLACE: $81,100 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetSOLUTIONS FOR URBAN AGRICULTURE: $65,150 over 2y, 29% of budgetCONCERN AMERICA: $60,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates: $55,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetTHE DRAGON KIM FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD: $29,300 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSurf and Turf Therapy: $27,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetWARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGIVING CHILDREN HOPE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetStandUp for Kids: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SAMBURU PROJECT INC: $24,400 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetLOTUS OUTREACH: $22,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetWillow International Everfree: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTALLER SAN JOSE HOPE BUILDERS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS FOR WOMEN FOUNDATION: $18,140 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetSAVE OUR YOUTH SOY: $15,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Communi…Samueli FoundationThe William Gillespie…OneocSisters of St Joseph …Enterprise Holdings F…Affordable Housing Ac…The Larry and Helen H…The Devto Support Fou…O L Halsell FoundationSempra FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…
Orange County Community FoundationCA24.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Samueli Foundation · The William Gillespie Foundation · Oneoc · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Affordable Housing Access Inc · The Larry and Helen Hoag Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Impact Giving funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Impact Giving. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Impact Giving’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home