Skip to content

California · Public charity

Impact Giving

Provide grants to other exempt organizations based upon an analysis of applications. Grants are awarded for programs that make a high impact by transforming lives.

$201k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
6
Itemized grants FY2025
5
Organizations funded FY2024
80%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$166k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$30,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$40,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 7
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$241k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 80% of the organizations Impact Giving funded were first-time grantees, receiving 70% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesCivil RightsCrime & LegalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving6$166k50%
FY20245$135k80%
FY20237$169k86%
FY20225$115k60%
FY20216$120k0%
FY20206$120k67%
FY20196$130k83%
FY20186$130k83%
87% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$251kInternational$161kHousing & Shelter$155kHealth$121kYouth Development$114kCrime & Legal$85kHuman Services$79kPhilanthropy$79kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 24 grantees

Plus 12 recipients with no EIN on record ($353k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Impact Giving supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 21 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBrackens Kitchen Inc: $155,750 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetWiseplace: $81,100 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetSolutions for Urban Agriculture: $65,150 over 2y, 29% of budgetConcern America: $60,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates: $55,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetThe Dragon Kim Foundation: $35,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocate of Orange County: $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOrangewood Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFamilies Forward: $29,300 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSurf and Turf Therapy: $27,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetWarrior Foundation Freedom Station: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGiving Children Hope: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPathways to Independence: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetStandUp for Kids: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Samburu Project Inc: $24,400 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetLotus Outreach: $22,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetWillow International Everfree: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTaller San Jose Hope Builders: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNew Directions for Women Foundation: $18,140 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetSave Our Youth Soy: $15,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetElderhelp of San Diego: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 21.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA24.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Samueli Foundation · The William Gillespie Foundation · Oneoc · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Affordable Housing Access Inc · The Larry and Helen Hoag Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Impact Giving with peer funders

About Impact Giving

How much does Impact Giving give?
Impact Giving reported 6 itemized grants totaling $165,640, out of $201,060 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 7 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Impact Giving fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (20%), International (13%), Housing & Shelter (13%).
Who are Impact Giving's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Brackens Kitchen Inc ($156k), Wiseplace ($81k), Solutions for Urban Agriculture ($65k).
Does Impact Giving fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 80% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Impact Giving?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Orange County Community Foundation, Samueli Foundation, The William Gillespie Foundation.
Where is Impact Giving based?
Impact Giving is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Impact Giving’s filings →

More from the funding graph