Skip to content

California · Public charity

Impact Cubed

To stimulate philanthropy and build social sector capacity by providing guidance to donors, facilitating funder consortia, and engaging community groups. Efforts will be primarily dedicated to enhancing impact, building talent, and nurturing equity in jewish

$2.0M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
12
Itemized grants FY2024
5
Organizations funded FY2023
60%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

92% of Impact Cubed’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of San Diego County, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Impact Cubed named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $749k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’19
11
’20
5
’21
7
’22
5
’23
12
’24
2
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Itemized, FY2024
$749k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$54,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$230,360
Organizations funded a year
5 to 11
FY2019 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$1.1M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 60% of the organizations Impact Cubed funded were first-time grantees, receiving 20% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
InternationalEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving12$749k67%
FY20235$426k60%
FY20227$1.3M86%
FY20215$60k100%
FY202011$230k100%
FY20197$196kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$1.8MHealth$408kPhilanthropy$303kInternational$140kCivil Rights$124kPublic Safety & Disaster$108kScience & Tech$100kReligion$83kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
PA
CT
CA
KY
AZ
DC
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
I Am Your Protector Inc$1,100,000180%
Regents of the University of California at San Diego$434,7154n/a
University of San Diego$346,23730%
California State University San Marcos Foundation$267,03222%
Merit Spread Foundation Inc$81,50011%
Center for Community Stewardship$75,00014%
Regents of the University of California$57,1321n/a
The American Friends of the Association for the Advancement Of$54,000111%
Bend the Arc - a Jewish Partnership for Justice$54,00011%
American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ$49,00030%
Show all 41 grantees
All grantees of Impact Cubed by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
I Am Your Protector Inc$1,100,000180%
Regents of the University of California at San Diego$434,7154n/a
University of San Diego$346,23730%
California State University San Marcos Foundation$267,03222%
Merit Spread Foundation Inc$81,50011%
Center for Community Stewardship$75,00014%
Regents of the University of California$57,1321n/a
The American Friends of the Association for the Advancement Of$54,000111%
Bend the Arc - a Jewish Partnership for Justice$54,00011%
American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ$49,00030%
Avodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc$45,00011%
Mightycause Charitable Foundation$39,50010%
Union for Reform Judaism$36,1221n/a
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System$34,5601n/a
American Society of the University of Haifa$30,00011%
ALEPH Alliance for Jewish Renewal$25,00012%
Friends of Israel Story$20,0001n/a
Jews for Racial & Economic Justice$20,00011%
Footage Foundation Inc$18,00018%
San Diego County Medical Society Foundation Dba Champions for Health$18,00011%
Neighborhood Healthcare$18,00010%
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life$15,70010%
M2 the Institute for Experiential Jewish Education$15,00010%
Keshet$15,00010%
Jewish Entertainment Network Los Angeles$15,0001n/a
Green-4-Kids$13,50012%
Interfaith Community Services Inc$12,00010%
Feeding Texas$11,99710%
Arizona Center for Nature Conservation$10,00010%
Palomar Family Counseling Service Inc$9,00010%
The Arh Foundation for Healthier Communities Inc$7,50013%
Save The Children Federation Inc$6,63610%
Association of Fundraising Professionals San Diego Chapter$6,50012%
Brother Benno Foundation Inc$6,25010%
North County Philanthropy Council$6,00013%
Hillel of San Diego$6,00010%
Urban Adamah$5,00010%
The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc$5,00010%
Habonim Labor Zionist Youth Inc$5,00011%
Global Purpose Approach$5,0001n/a
Hazon Inc$5,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

Impact Cubed supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 34 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetI Am Your Protector Inc: $1,100,000 over 1y, 80% of budgetUniversity of San Diego: $346,237 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia State University San Marcos Foundation: $267,032 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMerit Spread Foundation Inc: $81,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCenter for Community Stewardship: $75,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetThe American Friends of the Association for the Advancement Of: $54,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetBend the Arc - a Jewish Partnership for Justice: $54,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $49,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAvodah the Jewish Service Corps Inc: $45,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMightycause Charitable Foundation: $39,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Society of the University of Haifa: $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALEPH Alliance for Jewish Renewal: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetJews for Racial & Economic Justice: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFootage Foundation Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetSan Diego County Medical Society Foundation Dba Champions for Health: $18,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNeighborhood Healthcare: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life: $15,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetM2 the Institute for Experiential Jewish Education: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKeshet: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGreen-4-Kids: $13,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetInterfaith Community Services Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding Texas: $11,997 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Center for Nature Conservation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPalomar Family Counseling Service Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Arh Foundation for Healthier Communities Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $6,636 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAssociation of Fundraising Professionals San Diego Chapter: $6,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBrother Benno Foundation Inc: $6,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorth County Philanthropy Council: $6,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHillel of San Diego: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUrban Adamah: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabonim Labor Zionist Youth Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHazon Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 34.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Leichtag FoundationCA30.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Leichtag Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Impactassetsinc · Upstart Bay Area · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Tides Center

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Impact Cubed with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Impact Cubed?

Find your warmest path to Impact Cubed through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Impact Cubed

How much does Impact Cubed give?
Impact Cubed reported 12 itemized grants totaling $748,841, out of $2,013,006 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 11 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.
What does Impact Cubed fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (56%), Health (13%), Philanthropy (9%).
Who are Impact Cubed's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: I Am Your Protector Inc ($1.1M), Regents of the University of California at San Diego ($435k), University of San Diego ($346k).
Does Impact Cubed fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 60% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Impact Cubed?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Leichtag Foundation, Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego, The San Diego Foundation.
Where is Impact Cubed based?
Impact Cubed is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Impact Cubed’s filings →

More from the funding graph