Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Immanuel

Recognizing that all we have comes from god, we have been called to be faithful and courageous stewards of god's resources.

$153k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$756kHousing & Shelter$623kHealth$217kHuman Services$198kFood & Nutrition$127kReligion$79kCommunity Improvement$32kRecreation & Sports$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $121,989 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $152,721 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $30,732 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $102k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$813M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHI HEALTH$101,989
LUTHERAN SERVICES IN AMERICA$10,000
OMAHA SYMPHONY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES: $11k → 12%DREAMWEAVER FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%DREAMWEAVER FOUNDATION: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Immanuel’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in NE; read by stated purpose it is 57% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Immanuellessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 41% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 12 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$2.0M
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
-9%

Still filing today

83%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHealthHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IT
    IMMANUEL TRINITY AFFORDABLE INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $347k · revenue +48%
  • IA
    IMMANUEL AFFORDABLE II INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $187k · revenue +35%
  • IA
    IMMANUEL AFFORDABLE INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $89k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • SL
    SYSCO LINCOLN
    one grant, 2018 · $86k
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -9%
  • SI
    SEAFARERS & INTERNATIONAL HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Immanuel

Recognizing that all we have comes from god, we have been called to be faithful and courageous stewards of god's resources. following christ's call to serve, we will meet the physical, emotional and spiritual needs of seniors; respond to…

Health
2
Irc Ii Inc

Christ-centered service to seniors, each other and the community.

Housing & Shelter
3
Immanuel Retirement Communities Inc

Christ-centered service to seniors, each other and the community.

Housing & Shelter
4
Immanuel Long Term Care

Christ-centered service to seniors, each other and the community.

Health
5
Lutheran Home At Moorestown

Through the power of the holy spirit and in response to god's love as revealed in the gospel, the mission of lutheran social ministries of nj is to serve those who hurt, who are in need, or who have limited choices through an array of…

6
Ecumen

We empower individuals and families to confidently navigate aging so that it is a purposeful journey filled with dignity and support.

7
Alegent Health-Immanuel Medical Center

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
8
Immanuel Community Vision Foundation

Recognizing that all we have comes from god, we have been called to be faithful and courageous stewards of god's resources. following christ's call to serve, we will meet the physical, emotional and spiritual needs of seniors; respond to…

Housing & Shelter
9
Pace Iowa

Christ-centered service to seniors, each other and the community.

Health
10
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

11
Miravida Living Inc

Miravida living inc is a family of healthcare and residential service organizations committed to providing quality care and enriching opportunities to the aging and those in need in a caring, christian environment.

Human Services
12
Meridian Village Association

To address and meet the needs of aged persons, including housing, healthcare, and financial security.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Immanuel Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Omaha Against Hunger. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALEGENT CREIGHTON HEALTH — $952,508 · HealthALEGENT CREIGHTON HEALTH+2 more — $20,000 · HealthIMMANUEL TRINITY AFFORDABLE INC — $346,500 · Housing & ShelterIMMANUEL TRINITY AFFORDABLE INCIMMANUEL AFFORDABLE II INC — $187,377 · Housing & ShelterIMMANUEL AFFORDABLE II INCIMMANUEL AFFORDABLE INC — $88,840 · Housing & ShelterIMMANUEL AFFORDABLE INCNEBRASKA SYNOD OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA — $172,375 · OtherNEBRASKA SYNOD OF THE…SYSCO LINCOLN — $86,069 · OtherSYSCO LINCOLNOMAHA AGAINST HUNGER — $40,480 · OtherOMAHA AGAINST HUNGERNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES — $36,726 · OtherNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUT…Tabitha Inc — $35,500 · OtherTabitha Inc+3 more — $21,000 · Other+3 moreLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC — $36,000 · Human ServicesDREAMWEAVER FOUNDATION — $15,750 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SERVICES IN AMERICA INCORPORATED — $32,000 · ReligionOMAHA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$972,508Housing & Shelter$622,717Other$392,150Human Services$51,750Religion$32,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALEGENT CREIGHTON HEALTH — $952,508 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetIMMANUEL TRINITY AFFORDABLE INC — $346,500 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetIMMANUEL AFFORDABLE II INC — $187,377 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetIMMANUEL AFFORDABLE INC — $88,840 over 4y, 14% of budgetOMAHA AGAINST HUNGER — $40,480 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetNEBRASKA LUTHERAN OUTDOOR MINISTRIES — $36,726 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC — $36,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTabitha Inc — $35,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SERVICES IN AMERICA INCORPORATED — $32,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDREAMWEAVER FOUNDATION — $15,750 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetOMAHA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMMANUEL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 326 MID-AMERICA COUNCIL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hawks FoundationNE15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hawks Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Immanuel funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph