Skip to content
Image Clear Ultrasound Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Image Clear Ultrasound Inc

Educating,training and equipping pregnancy counseling centers on the provision of ultrasound services to pregnant women who may otherwise not receive such services

$780k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2021.

Health$757kHuman Services$100kCivil Rights$87k
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF PLANT CITY$120,000
EVES HOPE CORP$109,195
WOMENS HEALTH SERVICES INC$100,468
HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER OF BRAZOS VAL$100,000
A PLACE FOR WOMEN IN WAIPIO$100,000
TLC PREGNANCY SERVICES$100,000
EAST TEXAS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER$100,000
LIFE ON WHEELS$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ICU MOBILE RIVERSIDE COUNTY: $1k → 11%A PLACE FOR WOMEN IN WAIPIO: $100k → 9%EAST TEXAS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER: $100k → 19%HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER OF BRAZOS VAL: $100k → 22%CABOT CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $20k → 12%PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF PLANT CITY: $120k → 13%EVES HOPE CORP: $109k → 15%PREGNANCY CRISIS CENTER OF LAKE CIT: $10k → 19%PREGNANCY HELPLINE THREE RIVERS: $21k → 13%WOMENS HEALTH SERVICES INC: $100k → 15%OPEN DOOR PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $10k → 15%LIFELINE PREGNANCY HELP CENTER: $10k → 17%LIVING ALTERNATIVES PRC: $87k → 9%TLC PREGNANCY SERVICES: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
CA
KS
AR
NC
HI
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

—
2
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
3
Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc
—
4
Willow Womens Center

The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.

Human Services
5
Center for Pregnancy Choices

Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.

Health
6
Pregnancy Care Center Inc Dba Life Choices Clinic

Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…

Health
7
Alpha Womens Center

Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.

Human Services
8
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
9
Life Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina

Choosing Life over Abortion

Human Services
10
Lifechoice Pregnancy Care Center

To provide support to unplanned pregnancies.

—
11
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
12
Life Choices Care Center

To provide support for pregnant women

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Care Center of Plant City Inc; the most unlike its peers is Choose Life of North Alabama Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EVE'S HOPE: $109,195 · HealthEVE'S HOPEWOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES INC: $100,468 · HealthWOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES INCEAST TEXAS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER INC: $100,000 · HealthEAST TEXAS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER INCHOPE PREGNANCY CENTER OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $100,000 · HealthHOPE PREGNANCY CENTER OF BRAZOS VALLEYPREGNANCY HELPLINE OF THREE RIVERS: $21,000 · HealthCabot Crisis Pregnancy Center: $20,000 · Health+2 more: $20,000 · HealthPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF PLANT CITY INC: $120,000 · OtherPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF PLANT CITY INCTLC PREGNANCY SERVICES: $100,000 · OtherTLC PREGNANCY SERVICESA PLACE FOR WOMEN IN WAIPIO: $100,000 · OtherA PLACE FOR WOMEN IN WAIPIOIndividual grant recipient: $86,890 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+2 more: $11,000 · OtherLIFE ON WHEELS: $55,000 · Human Services
Health$470,663Other$417,890Human Services$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF PLANT CITY INC: $120,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetEVE'S HOPE: $109,195 over 1y, 32% of budgetWOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES INC: $100,468 over 1y, 23% of budgetEAST TEXAS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER INC: $100,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetHOPE PREGNANCY CENTER OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $100,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetLIFE ON WHEELS: $55,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetCabot Crisis Pregnancy Center: $20,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetPregnancy Crisis Center of Lake City Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLIFELINE PREGNANCY HELP CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetOPEN DOOR PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Knights of Columbus C…American Endowment Fo…Natl Christian Charit…Raymond James Charita…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Knights of Columbus Charities IncCT25.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Image Clear Ultrasound Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Image Clear Ultrasound Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Image Clear Ultrasound Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Image Clear Ultrasound Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $50k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Image Clear Ultrasound’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home