· Public charity
Image Clear Ultrasound Inc
Educating,training and equipping pregnancy counseling centers on the provision of ultrasound services to pregnant women who may otherwise not receive such services
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF PLANT CITY | $120,000 |
| EVES HOPE CORP | $109,195 |
| WOMENS HEALTH SERVICES INC | $100,468 |
| A PLACE FOR WOMEN IN WAIPIO | $100,000 |
| HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER OF BRAZOS VAL | $100,000 |
| EAST TEXAS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER | $100,000 |
| TLC PREGNANCY SERVICES | $100,000 |
| LIFE ON WHEELS | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.
The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…
The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.
Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.
Acknowledging that every human life begins at conception and is worthy of protection, Life Choices Clinic offers compassion, hope, and help to anyone considering abortion by presenting them with realistic alternatives and Christ-centered…
Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.
Crisis pregnancy counseling.
Choosing Life over Abortion
To provide support to unplanned pregnancies.
Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.
To provide support for pregnant women
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Care Center of Plant City Inc and the most unlike its peers is Choose Life of North Alabama Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF PLANT CITY INC ↗
- Who funds EVE'S HOPE ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds EAST TEXAS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER OF BRAZOS VALLEY ↗
- Who funds LIFE ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY HELPLINE OF THREE RIVERS ↗
- Who funds Cabot Crisis Pregnancy Center ↗
- Who funds Pregnancy Crisis Center of Lake City Inc ↗
- Who funds LIFELINE PREGNANCY HELP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Image Clear Ultrasound Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Image Clear Ultrasound Inc?
Find your warmest path to Image Clear Ultrasound Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.