Skip to content

· Public charity

Illinois Stewardship Alliance

The purpose of the ILLINOIS STEWARDSHIP ALLIANCE is to promote the ecologically sustainable, economically viable, socially just, local food systems through policy development, advocacy, and education.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$1.5MCommunity Improvement$150kEnvironment$90k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $1,456,200, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,800,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $343,800 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $44k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.4M
$105,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLEN'S FARM QUALITY MEATS$150,000
FULLER PARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$150,000
CENTRAL IL FARM FRESH ENTERPRISE DEV COOP$148,000
JO DAVIESS LOCAL FOODS$140,000
SOLA GRATIA FARM$117,690
DOWN AT THE FARMS LLC$110,000
DEMANGE FARMS$106,000
ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$105,000
URBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC$95,000
LEAF FOOD HUB$79,887
FUNKS GROVE HERITAGE FRUITS & GRAIN$72,124
JUST ROOTS$70,000
TULIP TREE GARDENS CO$59,900
ILLINOIS COUNTRY HARVEST$26,900
GARLIC BREATH FARM$17,599
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PALOMARES SOCIAL JUSTICE CENTER: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$352k · 3 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +175% since the first grant, against +146% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
24

Total granted

$352k
$256k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+175%
+146%

Still filing today

33%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’24
Food & NutritionEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    Down at the Farms LLC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $135k
  • SG
    SOLA GRATIA FARM
    2× · 2020–2024 · $128k · revenue +175%
  • LF
    LEAF FOOD HUB
    3× · 2020–2024 · $89k

Funded once

  • IE
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL EDUCATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue +158%
  • TF
    TERRIPIN FARMS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • LJ
    LUCY JILL RENDLEMAN ALL SEASON'S FARM
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Green Chicago Restaurant Coalition

Green Chicago Restaurant Coalition's Guaranteed Green Sustainability Education Program educates foodservice operators about assessing the present state of their operation's environmental sustainability and helps them to develop a plan to…

—
2
Chicago's Green City Market Program

Green city market is securing the future of food by deepening support for sustainable farmers, educating our community, and expanding access to locally-grown food.

Food & Nutrition
3
Plant Chicago Nfp

Plant Chicago's mission is to cultivate local circular economies. We envision a paradigm shift in production, consumption, and waste driven at the local level, generating equity and economic opportunity for all residents.

Food & Nutrition
4
Heartlands Conservancy

The mission of heartlands conservancy is to empower and colaborate with the people of southern illinois to advance and protect the health of our distinctive communities and nationally significant natural and cultural resources.

Environment
5
Chicago Food Policy Action Council

The Organization facilitates and informs the development of and advocacy for responsible policies improving the food sovereignty of Chicago residents as they have power and control to determine culturally appropriate, nutritionally sound…

Food & Nutrition
6
Illinois Agricultural Leadership Foundation

To develop knowledgeable and effective leaders to become policy and decision makers for the agricultural industry.

Public Benefit
7
Friends of Sears Sunken Garden

Friends of Sears Sunken Garden promotes and assists in the redesign, construction and maintenance of the historic Sears Sunken Garden located in the North Lawndale neighborhood of the City of Chicago for the use and enjoyment of the…

Environment
8
Chicago's Environmental Fund
—
9
Sprout City Farms

Sprout city farms collaborates with communities to pursue food justice by cultivating innovative, restorative, and educational farms. sprout city farms envisions a thriving and equitable food system supported by a network of farms and…

Food & Nutrition
10
McHenry County Eco Farm Nfp

Teach people to grow food in responsible, sustainable ways while nurturing love and gratitude for the land and for each other. Programs are open to the public, free of charge. Food raised will be donated to food pantries.

Food & Nutrition
11
Angelic Organics Learning Center Inc

At farmers rising, we lift up the people doing local and regenerative farming.

Food & Nutrition
12
Illinois Grazing Lands Coalition

Educates stakeholders in illinois on environmental, economic, and social knowledge related to its grasslands.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star Farm Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Palomares Social Justice Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLEN'S FARM QUALITY MEATS: $150,000 · OtherALLEN'S FARM QUALITY MEATSCENTRAL IL FARM FRESH ENTERPRISE DEV COOP: $148,000 · OtherCENTRAL IL FARM FRESH ENTERPRISE DEV COOPJO DAVIESS LOCAL FOODS: $140,000 · OtherJO DAVIESS LOCAL FOODSDown at the Farms LLC: $135,000 · OtherDown at the Farms LLCDEMANGE FARMS: $106,000 · OtherDEMANGE FARMSST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $105,000 · OtherST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCHLEAF FOOD HUB: $88,887 · OtherLEAF FOOD HUBFUNKS GROVE HERITAGE FRUITS & GRAIN: $72,124 · OtherFUNKS GROVE HERITAGE FRUITS & GRAINTULIP TREE GARDENS CO: $59,900 · Other+24 more: $209,999 · Other+24 moreSOLA GRATIA FARM: $127,690 · Food & NutritionSOLA GRATIA FARMURBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC: $95,000 · Food & NutritionURBAN GROWERS COLL…JUST ROOTS JUST ROOTS CHICAGO: $70,000 · Food & NutritionJUST ROOTS JUST RO…Fuller Park Community Development Corp: $150,000 · Community ImprovementFuller Pa…ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL EDUCATION: $80,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentPalomares Social Justice Center: $8,100 · Human Services
Other$1,214,910Food & Nutrition$292,690Community Improvement$150,000Environment$90,000Human Services$8,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFuller Park Community Development Corp: $150,000 over 1y, 69% of budgetSOLA GRATIA FARM: $127,690 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetURBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC: $95,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL EDUCATION: $80,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetJUST ROOTS JUST ROOTS CHICAGO: $70,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTAR FARM CHICAGO: $5,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fuller Park Community Development Corp ↗
  • Who funds SOLA GRATIA FARM ↗
  • Who funds URBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds JUST ROOTS JUST ROOTS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Palomares Social Justice Center ↗
  • Who funds STAR FARM CHICAGO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Experimental StationIL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Experimental Station · Grand Victoria Foundation · The Lumpkin Family Foundation · Forefront · Builders Vision Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Illinois Stewardship Alliance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Illinois Stewardship Alliance. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Illinois Stewardship Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph