Skip to content
Illinois Chapter of American Academy of Pediatrics at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Illinois Chapter of American Academy of Pediatrics

To promote child well-being and healthcare access in Illinois through education, resources, and member support and by advocating on behalf of children, youth, families, and health professionals.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$2.6M
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $131,847, the rows itemized in this filing. The $161,347 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $29,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $127k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The University of Chicago$42,076
Alliance Chicago$24,771
Advocate Medical Group Oak Lawn$10,000
Advocate Medical Group Lutheran General Primary Pediatrics$10,000
Advocate Medical Group Orland Park Pediatrics$10,000
Advocate Medical Group Evergreen Park$10,000
Downers Grove Pediatrics Bolingbrook$10,000
Loyola University Medical Center$10,000
Advocate Medical Group Glenbrook$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%WABASH COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $13k → 12%Downers Grove Pediatrics Bolingbrook: $10k → 7%ILLINOIS ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS: $669k → 7%ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE: $7k → 8%MERCER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $9k → 9%DOUGLAS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $7k → 9%ILLINOIS PRIMARY HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION: $125k → 11%MASON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $6k → 13%DEKALB COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $10k → 13%ADAMS COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $10k → 13%CLAY COUNTY HEALTH HEALTH: $12k → 14%KANKAKEE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $10k → 14%JACKSON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $10k → 14%SCHOOL HEALTH LINK: $10k → 15%CHRISTIAN COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $8k → 16%CHAMPAIGN URBANA PUBLIC HEALTH DISTRICT: $10k → 19%ILLINOIS ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS: $483k → 7%FENIX FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $9k → 8%RAVENSWOOD PEDIATRICS: $6k → 14%PROMISE HEALTH: $8k → 19%ILLINOIS ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS: $340k → 7%Loyola University Medical Center: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $317k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $265k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $139k → 14%The University of Chicago: $42k → 14%ALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER: $7k → 14%Alliance Chicago: $25k → 14%Advocate Medical Group Oak Lawn: $10k → 14%Advocate Medical Group Evergreen Park: $10k → 14%Advocate Medical Group Glenbrook: $5k → 14%Advocate Medical Group Orland Park Pediatrics: $10k → 14%Advocate Medical Group Lutheran General Primary Pediatrics: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
2
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
3
Loyola University Health System

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.loyola university health system is a member of trinity health.

Health
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
6
Endeavor Health Clinical Operations

Endeavor Health Clinical Operations follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
7
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
8
Infant Welfare Society of Chicago

Infant welfare society of chicago (iws) (d/b/a iws family health) provides quality medical, dental and behavioral health services for the health, physical and mental development of children and their families in the chicagoland community.

—
9
Chicago Family Health Center Inc

Chicago family health center will promote health, work to prevent disease and provide treatment through the delivery of quality, accessible primary healtcare that is culturally sensitive, affordable, and responsive to community and…

—
10
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
11
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise Healthcare Nfp; the most unlike its peers is Alliancechicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ILLINOIS ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS: $1,492,533 · OtherILLINOIS ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANSIllinois Primary Health Care Association: $125,000 · OtherIllinois Primary Health Care Association+18 more: $165,457 · Other+18 moreUniversity of Chicago: $762,426 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoALLIANCECHICAGO: $24,771 · HealthSCHOOL HEALTH LINK INCORPORATED: $10,449 · HealthLOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 · HealthFenix Family Health Center: $9,000 · HealthPROMISE HEALTHCARE NFP: $7,500 · HealthALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC: $7,457 · HealthRosalind Franklin University Health Clinics: $6,500 · Health
Other$1,782,990Education$762,426Health$75,677

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetILLINOIS ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS: $1,492,533 over 3y, 24% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $762,426 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIllinois Primary Health Care Association: $125,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALLIANCECHICAGO: $24,771 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOOL HEALTH LINK INCORPORATED: $10,449 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFenix Family Health Center: $9,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPROMISE HEALTHCARE NFP: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC: $7,457 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRosalind Franklin University Health Clinics: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ILLINOIS ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Primary Health Care Association ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCECHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL HEALTH LINK INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Fenix Family Health Center ↗
  • Who funds PROMISE HEALTHCARE NFP ↗
  • Who funds ALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Rosalind Franklin University Health Clinics ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delta Dental of Illin…Center for Technology…Illinois Primary Heal…Telligen Community In…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Delta Dental of Illinois FoundationIL22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delta Dental of Illinois Foundation · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Illinois Primary Health Care Association · Telligen Community Initiative · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Illinois Chapter of American Academy of Pediatrics funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Illinois Chapter of American Academy of Pediatrics. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Illinois Chapter of American Academy of Pediatrics?

    Find your warmest path to Illinois Chapter of American Academy of Pediatrics through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Illinois Chapter of American Academy of Pediatrics’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home