Skip to content

· Public charity

Illinois Action for Children

Illinois Action for Children uplifts children and all who care for them, advancing strong families and prosperous communities.

$8.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$71kHuman Services$57kYouth Development$11kHealth$3kReligion$3k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $7,011, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,724,073 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,717,062 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,011
Median grant
1
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Kiddie Academy Of Mount Prospect$7,011
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Concordia Place: $8k → 14%Concordia Place: $6k → 14%Concordia Place: $5k → 14%Concordia Place: $5k → 14%Prodigy Child Learning Ctr: $4k → 14%Kidwatch Plus: $7k → 14%Kidwatch Plus: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$101k · 7 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$101k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+39%

Still filing today

29%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CONCORDIA PLACE
    7× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +68%
  • TL
    The Learning Tree of East Elgin (Premier IL Elgin East
    3× · 2021–2023 · $17k
  • SL
    Smart Learning Center A
    5× · 2017–2025 · $14k

Funded once

  • LA
    Little Achievers
    4× · 2020–2023 · $8k
  • RD
    Rainbow Daycare
    4× · 2017–2020 · $6k
  • HK
    Happy Kids Preschool & Daycare Ctr
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Joyful Learning Edc

In 2001, Joyful Learning Educational Development Center (Joyful Learning EDC) was founded with a clear vision to provide accessible, high-quality childcare that meets the diverse needs of every child.

Education
2
Tlc Child Care Inc

Provide christian based daycare and pre-school

Human Services
3
Beggining Child Care Center

Child care services and child preschool instruction

Education
4
Tiny Tots & Dots Learning Academy

Day Care ServicesYour needs and your childs needs are our top priority Our focus is on development and communication skills of children We work closely with parents and our community

Education
5
Child Development Center
Human Services
6
East Side Early Learning Center

The center provides quality care and education to children of working parents and is licensed to care for 44 children from ages 6 weeks to 5 years old.

Human Services
7
Kid Central

Our mission is to provide quality and safe childcare for the families in our community and provide our youngest learners with a positive start to their education journey.

Education
8
Aurelia Daycare Inc

Provide high quality child care and creative opportunities for growth, development, and lifelong learning in a nurturing, reliable, and affordable environment.

Human Services
9
Little Lambs Childcare Center
Human Services
10
Little Footprints Learning Center

To improve the learning for the childrens in the community

Religion
11
Little Beginnings Child Development Ctr

Little Beginnings provides pre kindergarten and day care to children under 6 years of age. We believe that learning and playing are synonymous for the preschool age child. Young children learn best when they have an opportunity to practice…

—
12
Children's Discovery Center

Education and social developement center to provide preschool and after school care to children while promoting a child's emotional, educational and physical growth.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Metropolitan Chicago Inc; the most unlike its peers is Seeds of Joy Enterprises Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Learning Tree of East Elgin (Premier IL Elgin East: $17,455 · OtherThe Learning Tree of East Elgin (Premier IL Elgin EastSmart Learning Center A: $14,453 · OtherSmart Learning Center AState of IL Child Development Ctr: $11,862 · OtherState of IL Child Development CtrSmall World Learning Center: $10,242 · OtherSmall World Learning CenterBlooming Bud Daycare Center: $9,236 · OtherBlooming Bud Daycare CenterLittle Achievers: $8,000 · OtherLittle AchieversKIDDIE ACADEMY OF MT PROSPECT: $7,011 · OtherKIDDIE ACADEMY OF MT PROSPECTRainbow Daycare: $6,000 · OtherRainbow DaycareHappy Kids Preschool & Daycare Ctr: $5,460 · OtherBode Preschool & Childcare Ctr: $3,814 · Other+6 more: $10,950 · Other+6 moreCONCORDIA PLACE: $24,234 · Human ServicesCONCORDIA PLACEKIDWATCH PLUS INC: $13,873 · Human ServicesKIDWATCH PLUS INCPRODIGY CHILD INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesPRODIGY CHILD INC
Other$104,483Human Services$41,607

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONCORDIA PLACE: $24,234 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetKIDWATCH PLUS INC: $13,873 over 8y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONCORDIA PLACE ↗
  • Who funds KIDWATCH PLUS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRODIGY CHILD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Henry Booth HouseIL25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Henry Booth House · Community Services for Children Inc · Women's Business Development Center · YWCA Metropolitan Chicago · Think Small · Early Learning Coalition of Broward County Inc · The Allstate Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Illinois Action for Children funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Illinois Action for Children. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Illinois Action for Children?

    Find your warmest path to Illinois Action for Children through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Illinois Action for Children’s filings →

    More from the funding graph