Skip to content
Ifit Health & Fitness Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Ifit Health & Fitness Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$459kEducation$58kFood & Nutrition$19kCrime & Legal$16kArts & Culture$7kEmployment$6kHealth$4kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
$45,326
Median grant
1
States reached
$132k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISCELLANEOUS CHARITABLE RECIPIENTS$45,326
CAPSA$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CACHE REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CONNECTION: $14k → 12%LITTLE LAMBS FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%LITTLE LAMBS FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%LITTLE LAMBS FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%COMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$519k · 7 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$519k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+22%

Still filing today

57%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureEmploymentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE
    7× · 2018–2025 · $70k · revenue +257%
  • LL
    Little Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +81%
  • TF
    THE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE
    3× · 2018–2021 · $4k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • CJ
    CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • CR
    CACHE REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CONNECTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $14k · revenue +252%
  • CE
    CACHE EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
2
Utah Valley Family Support Center Inc

Provide services to victims and potential victims of child abuse and neglect.

—
3
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
4
Utah Foster Care Foundation Inc

We serve Utah's children by finding, educating, and nurturing families to meet the needs of children in foster care

Human Services
5
Kids Who Count

We empower families to optimize the developmental potential of their young children.

Education
6
Central Utah Enterprises

To provide services to disabled persons with a focus on assisting individuals in Utah County with cognitive disabilities gain skills to enable them to enter the workforce.

—
7
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
8
Child Liberation Foundation Inc

The Child Liberation Foundation (CLF), founded in February 2017, is dedicated to eradicating child trafficking worldwide. In 2023, CLF expanded its mission beyond rescue operations to emphasize rehabilitation and healing for survivors of…

Human Services
9
Recreation and Habilitation Services (Rah)

Provides services and supports to individuals in Utah County who have intellectual disabilities.

—
10
Ability 1st Utah

Assisting persons with disabilities to develop independent living and social skills, assisting with housing and transportation needs, rights advocacy, and counseling.

Human Services
11
Utah Swat Inc
—
12
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citizens Against Physical and Sexual Abuse; the most unlike its peers is Malouf Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISCELLANEOUS CHARITABLE RECIPIENTS: $351,793 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITABLE RECIPIENTSCACHE VALLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS: $57,553 · OtherCACHE VALLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSCHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER: $15,689 · Other+7 more: $29,282 · Other+7 moreCITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE: $69,809 · Human ServicesCITIZENS AGAINST PH…Little Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesLittle Lambs Founda…CACHE REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CONNECTION: $14,000 · Human ServicesCACHE REFUGEE AND I…+1 more: $1,372 · Human ServicesOUR RESCUE: $6,845 · Arts & CultureCACHE EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING CENTER: $6,145 · EmploymentCACHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $5,000 · InternationalMalouf Foundation: $595 · Philanthropy
Other$454,317Human Services$100,181Arts & Culture$6,845Employment$6,145International$5,000Philanthropy$595

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE: $69,809 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLittle Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $6,845 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCACHE EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING CENTER: $6,145 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCACHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE: $3,827 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSUNSHINE TERRACE FOUNDATION INC: $3,706 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES: $1,372 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMalouf Foundation: $595 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy Found…Jim and Carol Laub Fa…The Broadbent Family …Paul and Pamela Norma…Gary E Stevenson Foun…Butte Creek FoundationSchreiber Foods Found…The US Charitable Gif…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Jim and Carol Laub Family Foundation · The Broadbent Family Foundation · Paul and Pamela Norman Family Foundation · Gary E Stevenson Foundation · Butte Creek Foundation · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ifit Health & Fitness Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ifit Health & Fitness Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ifit Health & Fitness Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ifit Health & Fitness Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ifit Health & Fitness’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home