Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ifit Health & Fitness Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$459kEducation$58kFood & Nutrition$19kCrime & Legal$16kArts & Culture$7kEmployment$6kHealth$4kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
$45,326
Median grant
1
States reached
$132k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISCELLANEOUS CHARITABLE RECIPIENTS$45,326
CAPSA$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CACHE REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CONNECTION: $14k → 12%LITTLE LAMBS FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%LITTLE LAMBS FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%LITTLE LAMBS FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%COMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$519k · 7 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$519k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+22%

Still filing today

57%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureEmploymentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE
    7× · 2018–2025 · $70k · revenue +257%
  • LL
    Little Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +81%
  • TF
    THE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE
    3× · 2018–2021 · $4k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • CJ
    CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • CR
    CACHE REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CONNECTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $14k · revenue +252%
  • CE
    CACHE EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
2
Utah Valley Family Support Center Inc

Provide services to victims and potential victims of child abuse and neglect.

3
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
4
Utah Foster Care Foundation Inc

We serve Utah's children by finding, educating, and nurturing families to meet the needs of children in foster care

Human Services
5
Kids Who Count

We empower families to optimize the developmental potential of their young children.

Education
6
Central Utah Enterprises

To provide services to disabled persons with a focus on assisting individuals in Utah County with cognitive disabilities gain skills to enable them to enter the workforce.

7
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

8
Child Liberation Foundation Inc

The Child Liberation Foundation (CLF), founded in February 2017, is dedicated to eradicating child trafficking worldwide. In 2023, CLF expanded its mission beyond rescue operations to emphasize rehabilitation and healing for survivors of…

Human Services
9
Recreation and Habilitation Services (Rah)

Provides services and supports to individuals in Utah County who have intellectual disabilities.

10
Ability 1st Utah

Assisting persons with disabilities to develop independent living and social skills, assisting with housing and transportation needs, rights advocacy, and counseling.

Human Services
11
Utah Swat Inc
12
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citizens Against Physical and Sexual Abuse and the most unlike its peers is Malouf Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MISCELLANEOUS CHARITABLE RECIPIENTS — $351,793 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITABLE RECIPIENTSCACHE VALLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS — $57,553 · OtherCACHE VALLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSCHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER — $15,689 · Other+7 more — $29,282 · Other+7 moreCITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE — $69,809 · Human ServicesCITIZENS AGAINST PH…Little Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc — $15,000 · Human ServicesLittle Lambs Founda…CACHE REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CONNECTION — $14,000 · Human ServicesCACHE REFUGEE AND I…+1 more — $1,372 · Human ServicesOUR RESCUE — $6,845 · Arts & CultureCACHE EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING CENTER — $6,145 · EmploymentCACHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC — $5,000 · InternationalMalouf Foundation — $595 · Philanthropy
Other$454,317Human Services$100,181Arts & Culture$6,845Employment$6,145International$5,000Philanthropy$595

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCITIZENS AGAINST PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE — $69,809 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLittle Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $6,845 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCACHE EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING CENTER — $6,145 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCACHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FAMILY PLACE UTAH FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF CACHE — $3,827 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSUNSHINE TERRACE FOUNDATION INC — $3,706 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON GROUND OUTDOOR ADVENTURES — $1,372 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMalouf Foundation — $595 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Jim and Carol Laub Family Foundation · The Broadbent Family Foundation · Paul and Pamela Norman Family Foundation · Gary E Stevenson Foundation · Butte Creek Foundation · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ifit Health & Fitness Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ifit Health & Fitness Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ifit Health & Fitness Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph