Skip to content

· Public charity

IFE Foundation

1) To further charitable purposes by charitable grant making; provided that all such grants shall be made to organizations or entities exempt from federal income tax under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.2) To accept, hold, invest, reinvest and administer any gifts, bequests, devises, benefit of trusts and property of any kind and…

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$509k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$12MHuman Services$2.4MInternational$1.9M
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $492k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
$175,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$47M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
New Generations$509,000
Elife Church$500,000
Beyond$494,600
Impact Indonesia$175,000
Mio Frontiers$165,000
Global Teams Intl Inc$151,671
New Horizons Ministries$24,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Impact Indonesia: $699k → 6%Impact Indonesia: $494k → 6%Impact Indonesia: $452k → 6%Impact Indonesia: $379k → 6%Impact Indonesia: $175k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
CA
CO
MO
AZ
TN
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 10 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$14M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+34%

Still filing today

40%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NG
    NEW GENERATIONS
    6× · 2019–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +32%
  • II
    IMPACT INDONESIA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +13% · 65% of their budget
  • AN
    ALL NATIONS FAMILY INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $901k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • AI
    AFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2019 · $500k
  • CM
    CITYTEAM MINISTRIESgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue +34%
  • LG
    LAUNCH GLOBAL
    one grant, 2019 · $200k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
2
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
3
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
4
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
5
InitiativeGlobal

To join in the completion of the Great Commission through Scripture Engagement in all languages and every people group.

Religion
6
World Indigenous Missions Inc

Engaged in missionary training, organizing churches, evangelism, and related Christian activities.

Religion
7
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
8
Partners in Development Worldwide

Train ministers, lay people and students who are involved at any level of ministry in small or large churches at local, national, and international levels. We train to go into the world and spread the gospel by helping people meet their…

International
9
Going Beyond Missions

Train Gods people to live out a missionary lifestyle in their daily lives to obey the Great Commission. Build many mission teams and send the teams to UUPG Unreached Unengaged Peoples Group and make 10% of the world population disciples of…

Religion
10
Reaching Souls International Inc

Our mission is in our name - Reaching Souls. Our core driving force, the reason we exist as an organization, is to reach souls for Christ. Our strategic purpose is to reach the maximum number of people for Christ in the least amount of…

Religion
11
Indigenous Ministries International Inc

The purpose of IMI is reaching nationals through nationals in ministry.

Religion
12
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is UnfoldingWord; the most unlike its peers is Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW GENERATIONS: $3,351,043 · ReligionNEW GENERATIONSActBeyond: $3,309,935 · ReligionActBeyondALL NATIONS FAMILY INC: $901,390 · ReligionALL NATIONS FAMILY INCMIO Frontiers: $599,360 · ReligionMIO FrontiersCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $500,000 · ReligionCITYTEAM MINISTRIES+4 more: $492,538 · Religion+4 moreO C INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,152,435 · OtherO C INTERNATIONAL INCPIONEERS: $968,206 · OtherPIONEERSGLOBAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL INC: $565,007 · OtherGLOBAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL INCAFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED: $500,000 · OtherAFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATI…ELIFE CHURCH: $500,000 · OtherELIFE CHURCHScriptures In Use: $350,000 · OtherScriptures In UseROCKY MOUNTAIN BAPTIST CONFERENCE: $156,650 · Other+2 more: $223,600 · OtherIMPACT INDONESIA INC: $2,199,611 · Human ServicesIMPACT INDONESI…The New Horizons Foundation Inc: $125,000 · PhilanthropyALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $14,901 · International
Religion$9,154,266Other$4,415,898Human Services$2,199,611Philanthropy$125,000International$14,901

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW GENERATIONS: $3,351,043 over 6y, 14% of budgetActBeyond: $3,309,935 over 7y, 21% of budgetIMPACT INDONESIA INC: $2,199,611 over 5y, 65% of budgetALL NATIONS FAMILY INC: $901,390 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $500,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetScriptures In Use: $350,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetLAUNCH GLOBAL: $200,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFINAL COMMAND MINISTRIES: $200,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $125,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetunfoldingWord: $72,538 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNEAR EAST ORGANIZATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW GENERATIONS ↗
  • Who funds ActBeyond ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT INDONESIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL NATIONS FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds MIO Frontiers ↗
  • Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Scriptures In Use ↗
  • Who funds LAUNCH GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds FINAL COMMAND MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds unfoldingWord ↗
  • Who funds NEAR EAST ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Maclellan Foundation IncTN21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Servant Foundation · The Bolick Foundation · Tyndale House Ministries · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · G II Charities · First Fruit Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · V and J Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization IFE Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from IFE Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to IFE Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to IFE Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on IFE’s filings →

    More from the funding graph