Skip to content

· Private foundation

Idp Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$740k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$6.6MEducation$1.8MInternational$1.2MCommunity Improvement$200kArts & Culture$116kScience & Tech$80kAnimals$75kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $215k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$53M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$740,000
GLOBAL SCHOOLS FORUM$359,600
DIGNITAS LIMITED$215,004
Individual grant recipient$25,000
GHANA NATIONAL ASSOC OF PRIVATE SCHOOLS$20,000
SHEDD AQUARIUM$15,000
MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY$15,000
Musana$10,000
Ashesi University$5,000
INT'L EDUCATION FUNDERS GROUP CO GLOBAL DIALOGUE$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 71% of grant dollars ($7.2M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 29% that went abroad ($2.9M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Int'l Education Funders Group via Firelight Fdn: $3k → 13%Sesame Workshop: $82k → 17%Musana: $10k → 8%ASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY: $15k → 14%Int'l Education Funders Group via Firelight Fdn: $3k → 13%Sesame Workshop: $4k → 17%Ashesi University: $5k → 9%Shedd Aquarium: $20k → 14%Shedd Aquarium: $15k → 14%Adler Planetarium: $10k → 14%ALDER PLANETARIUM: $10k → 14%Adler Planetarium: $10k → 14%Northwestern University: $3.5M → 14%Northwestern University: $1.7M → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $740k → 14%Northwestern University: $292k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $200k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $200k → 14%COOK COUNTY SHERIFF'S POLICE LODGE #4: $750 → 14%Museum of Science and Industry: $20k → 14%MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY: $15k → 14%MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY: $15k → 14%Museum of Science and Industry: $10k → 14%MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY: $10k → 14%Museum of Science and Industry: $10k → 14%University of Illinois Chicago: $46k → 14%Forefront: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 29% of all-years giving ($2.9M)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$1.8M · 15 grants
Kenya$584k · 3 grants
Ghana$536k · 8 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.9M · 15 repeat orgs$261k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$9.9M
$221k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-3%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationPhilanthropyInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    6× · 2019–2024 · $6.6M · revenue +34%
  • SW
    SESAME WORKSHOP
    2× · 2019–2020 · $86k · revenue +6%
  • SA
    SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $90k
  • TB
    THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2019 · $46k
  • AR
    Absolute Return for Kids
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
3
National Geographic Society

To increase and diffuse geographic knowledge in the broadest sense, using the power of science, exploration, education and storytelling to illuminate and protect the wonder of the world.

Education
4
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
5
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
6
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
10
Illinois Institute of Technology

To provide distinctive and relevant education in an environment of scientific, technological, and professional knowledge creation and innovation.

Education
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwestern University; the most unlike its peers is Sesame Workshop. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Northwestern University: $6,633,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern University+1 more: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsGLOBAL SCHOOLS FORUM: $782,600 · OtherGLOBAL SCHOOLS FORUMDIGNITAS LIMITED: $584,207 · OtherDIGNITAS LIMITEDPPP Researchabsolute return for kids: $454,273 · OtherPPP Researchabsolute return for k…Sinapi Aba Trust: $443,106 · OtherSinapi Aba TrustGlobal Schools Forumabsolute return for kids: $400,000 · OtherGlobal Schools Forumabsolute retu…+13 more: $338,140 · Other+13 moreHARAMBE ENTREPRENEUR ALLIANCE: $200,000 · EducationSESAME WORKSHOP: $85,808 · Arts & CultureKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $80,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ADLER PLANETARIUM: $30,000 · Arts & CultureSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $75,000 · AnimalsASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · InternationalFOREFRONT: $3,495 · Philanthropy
Recreation & Sports$6,648,000Other$3,002,326Education$200,000Arts & Culture$195,808Animals$75,000International$10,000Philanthropy$3,495

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthwestern University: $6,633,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHARAMBE ENTREPRENEUR ALLIANCE: $200,000 over 2y, 65% of budgetSESAME WORKSHOP: $85,808 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $80,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADLER PLANETARIUM: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOREFRONT: $3,495 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds HARAMBE ENTREPRENEUR ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SESAME WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE ADLER PLANETARIUM ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOREFRONT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Idp Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Idp Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Idp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph