· Public charity
Idaho Foodbank Warehouse
To help feed, educate and advocate for Idaho's hungry through collaborative partnerships to develop efficient solutions that strengthen individuals, families, and communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $6,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $44,237,650 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $44,231,650 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CS Terry Reilly Boise | $1,500 |
| CS The Salvation Army Caldwell | $1,500 |
| Jerome Community Kitchen | $1,500 |
| Rock Creek Food Pantry | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMY9× · 2017–2025 · $14k
- RCREGIONAL COUNCIL FOR CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $13k
- USUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE9× · 2017–2025 · $8k
Funded once
- NSNAMPA SCHOOL DISTRICT5× · 2021–2025 · $20k
- SOSOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL SW ID SW ID DISTRICTgraduated9× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +245%
- CCCOMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INCgraduated9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +167%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide balanced nutritious noon meals for senior citizens in Minidoka County ID
Providing low-cost meals for the elderly in the surrounding area.
The program provides transportation, outreach services, meals, and recreational programs to the community's elderly citizens. The program serves more than 21,000 senior citizens in Meridian, Idaho. Seniors are transported for medical care,…
To offer a nutrition program for older persons.
Enhancing lives and building communities by providing transportation and nutrition services.
To provide nutritious meals and social activities at the center as well as home delivered meals and transportation for seniors
Providing meals to the senior citizens at the meal site and with home deliveries.
Prepare and deliver meals to the homes of older adults who are unable to shop or prepare meals due to illness, injury or disability. Meals are also available for eligible adults with disabilities. Also support disaster registry efforts to…
Serving senior citizens in area
Senior Center facility for the local Meals on Wheels production.
To provide service for Riverton's seniors that enrich the participantslife, well being, daily activities and independence.
To prepare and deliver healthy, nutritious meals to the elderly citizens of Snowflake and Taylor, ensuring that no senior in our community faces hunger or isolation alone.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Dinner Table Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hollister Elementary Boosters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL SW ID SW ID DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds INDIGENOUS IDAHO ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING HEARTS AND HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds MERIDIAN FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds ABERDEEN SENIOR CITIZENS OF BINGHAM COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE GIVING CUPBOARD ↗
- Who funds SUPPORTIVE HOUSING AND INNOVATIVE PARTNERSHIPS INC ↗
- Who funds CARE HOUSE PARTNERSHIPS - A NAZARENE COMPASSIONATE MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds STAR OUTREACH NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS ↗
- Who funds MELBA VALLEY SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL HOLY SPIRIT CONFERENCE ↗
- Who funds Middleton Food Pantry Inc ↗
- Who funds Emmett Valley Friendship Coalition ↗
- Who funds PARMA AREA SENIOR CITIZENS ↗
- Who funds RIRIE SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds RIGBY AREA SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Idaho Housing Foundation · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · United Way of Treasure Valley Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children · The Bews Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Idaho Foodbank Warehouse funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.