Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children

The organization's mission is to improve early care and education for young children.

$3.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 29 grants below total $2,335,406 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,534,189 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,198,783 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $191k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$70,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TREASURE VALLEY YMCA$400,000
NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION$200,000
Individual grant recipient$182,600
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO - BANNOCK COUNTY EARLY LEARNING COLLABORAT$95,000
CALDWELL SCHOOL DISTRICT$85,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL IDAHO$85,000
COLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO$84,870
MARSING SCHOOL DISTRICT$81,850
UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY$80,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO - AMERICAN FALLS EARLY LEARNING COLLABORAT$80,000
MURTAUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT #418$77,500
UNITED WAY OF NORTH IDAHO NORTH IDAHO ELC$75,000
WEST CENTRAL MOUNTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL$75,000
KUNA SCHOOL DISTRICT$70,000
SCHOOL DISTRICT #370 HOMEDALE ELC$70,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $653k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GIRAFEE LAUGH INC: $90k → 8%NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION: $300k → 8%GIRAFFE LAUGH INC: $12k → 8%NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION: $200k → 8%JANNUS INC: $38k → 8%CARE HOUSE LEARNING CENTER: $5k → 11%SUPER-KIDS DAY CARE CENTER INC: $9k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.3M · 24 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
78

Total granted

$5.3M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

29%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO
    4× · 2020–2024 · $452k · revenue +25%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $333k · revenue +34%
  • GL
    GIRAFFE LAUGH INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $102k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF U OF I BURSAR
    one grant, 2024 · $170k
  • AA
    ABC-ABOVE AND BEYOND THE CLASS
    one grant, 2024 · $90k
  • BS
    BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $84k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
2
Morningstar Learning Center Inc

Morningstar Learning Center's mission is to develop and connect Big Sky's young children and families by providing reliable childcare, quality early education, and supportive resources from planning through parenthood.

Education
3
Nek Community Growth Center

Education of childcare workers

Education
4
Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children

The organization's mission is to improve early care and education for young children.

Education
5
Teton Valley Collaborative for Early Learning

The collaborative for early learning supports the development and expansion of early care and learning opportunities for families and children of teton valley that prepares children for a successful start in school and life.

Education
6
Timberline Learning Center

Childcare facility Timberline Learning Center supports our mountain community by providing families with quality early childhood education in a safe environment. Our mission is to educate by cultivating the wonder of learning through…

Human Services
7
Sweetwater County Child Development Center Inc

Education of children ages birth through five.

8
Joyful Learning Edc

In 2001, Joyful Learning Educational Development Center (Joyful Learning EDC) was founded with a clear vision to provide accessible, high-quality childcare that meets the diverse needs of every child.

Education
9
United Way of Central and Southern Utah

We improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our local community to provide resources and programs that focus on health, education, and income.

10
United Way of the Yampa Valley

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our community and uniting our partners to succeed in four key impact areas of early childhood education, youth success, financial stability and health and crisis services.

11
Wyoming Early Childhood Partnership

The mission and purpose of the wyoming early childhood partnership is to lead a public-private partnership in the development of an accessible and sustainable, high quality, early childhood system that supports communities and families.

12
Mountain Tots Preschool

Mountain Tots preschool provides high quality early learning enrichment programs that enhances educational, social, emotional, physical, and cognitive development as well as Kindergarten-readiness. We provide preschool and childcare…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Treasure Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is Valley County Economic Develop Dba West Central Mtn Eco Develo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
6/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO — $1,000,000 · OtherTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHOUNITED WAY OF NORTH IDAHO INC — $380,270 · OtherUNITED WAY OF NORTH IDAHO INCKUNA SCHOOL DISTRICT — $324,461 · OtherEMMETT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT — $256,000 · OtherMARSING SCHOOL DISTRICT — $228,040 · OtherCOLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO — $209,770 · Other+101 more — $3,890,445 · Other+101 moreUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO — $451,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF …UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC — $332,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF …United Way of South Central Idaho Inc — $215,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of …National Law Enforcement Foundation — $500,000 · Human ServicesNational …GIRAFFE LAUGH INC — $101,500 · Human ServicesGIRAFFE L…JANNUS INC — $37,500 · Human ServicesJANNUS IN…+2 more — $13,666 · Human ServicesVALLEY COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOP DBA WEST CENTRAL MTN ECO DEVELO — $70,000 · Community ImprovementSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $33,250 · EnvironmentEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INC — $25,000 · EducationPOCATELLO VALLEY EDUCATORS INC — $6,647 · Education
Other$6,288,986Philanthropy$999,000Human Services$652,666Community Improvement$70,000Environment$33,250Education$31,647

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO — $1,000,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNational Law Enforcement Foundation — $500,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO — $451,500 over 4y, 16% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH IDAHO INC — $380,270 over 4y, 35% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC — $332,500 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetUnited Way of South Central Idaho Inc — $215,000 over 3y, 63% of budgetGIRAFFE LAUGH INC — $101,500 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetVALLEY COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOP DBA WEST CENTRAL MTN ECO DEVELO — $70,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetRURAL DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES INC — $61,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetJANNUS INC — $37,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $33,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSUPER-KIDS DAY CARE CENTER INC — $8,546 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPOCATELLO VALLEY EDUCATORS INC — $6,647 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCARE HOUSE LEARNING CENTER INCORPORATED — $5,120 over 1y, 14% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO
  • Who funds National Law Enforcement Foundation
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEASTERN IDAHO
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH IDAHO INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC
  • Who funds United Way of South Central Idaho Inc
  • Who funds GIRAFFE LAUGH INC
  • Who funds VALLEY COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOP DBA WEST CENTRAL MTN ECO DEVELO
  • Who funds RURAL DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Foundation IncID37× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · United Way of Treasure Valley Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Idaho Foodbank Warehouse · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation · Innovia Foundation · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Rural Development Initiatives Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children?

Find your warmest path to Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph