Skip to content

· Private foundation

I J Van Huffel Foundation Xxxxxxxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$184k
Granted FY2025still arriving
58
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$323kHealth$312kHuman Services$219kFood & Nutrition$201kPublic Safety & Disaster$169kReligion$159kYouth Development$72kRecreation & Sports$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k55 grants · $143k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$18,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$12,000
SALVATION ARMY$11,000
ST VINCENT DEPAUL$9,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$8,000
Sister Stella Shelter$8,000
TRUMBULL MOBILE MEALS$8,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$6,000
CHILDREN'S REHAB CENTER$6,000
ST JAMES CHURCH$4,500
ST MARY'S COLLEGE$4,000
HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY$4,000
ST JOSEPH'S HEALTH CENTER$4,000
JOHN F KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%St Marys Home: $1k → 8%St Marys Home: $1k → 8%St Marys Home: $1k → 8%St Marys Home: $1k → 8%St Marys Home: $1k → 8%Ohio Living Foundation: $2k → 15%Ohio Living Foundation: $2k → 15%Degage Ministries: $1k → 11%Degage Ministries: $1k → 11%Degage Ministries: $1k → 11%Degage Ministries: $1k → 11%Degage Ministries: $1k → 11%Degage Ministries: $1k → 11%Degage Ministries: $1k → 11%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $500 → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $8k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $8k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $8k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $8k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $7k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $7k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $7k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $7k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $5k → 19%TRUMBULL FAMILY FITNESS: $1k → 16%TRUMBULL FAMILY FITNESS: $1k → 16%TRUMBULL FAMILY FITNESS: $1k → 16%TRUMBULL FAMILY FITNESS: $1k → 16%TRUMBULL FAMILY FITNESS: $1k → 16%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $6k → 16%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $6k → 16%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $6k → 16%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $6k → 16%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $4k → 16%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $4k → 16%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $4k → 16%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $4k → 16%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $4k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
KY
MD
NC
HI
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 81 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

81 repeat relationships: 50 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
12

Total granted

$1.6M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+19%

Still filing today

35%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    TRUMBULL MOBILE MEALS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $66k · revenue +55%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +19%
  • BH
    BEATITUDE HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • TM
    TRUMBULL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • MS
    MARYKNOLL SISTERS OF ST DOMINIC INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
2
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
3
Trinity Hospital Twin City

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

—
4
Ohio Living Holdings

See schedule oto provide older adults with caring and quality services toward enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well-being consistent with the christian gospel. the organization is dedicated to living our mission and keeping…

Human Services
5
Trinity Continuing Care Services

We, trinity senior living communities and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.trinity continuing care services (d/b/a trinity health senior…

Health
6
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
7
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
8
Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc

As a catholic healthcare ministry, we provide comprehensive and compassionate care that improves the health of the people we serve.

Health
12
Mount Carmel College of Nursing

We, mount carmel and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mount carmel college of nursing is a member of mount carmel and trinity health.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Vienna Historical Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/40
Grantees still filing
29/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN RED CROSS: $160,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSJOHN F KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL: $134,000 · OtherJOHN F KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOLSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $101,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKSALVATION ARMY: $96,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYST VINCENT DEPAUL: $70,000 · OtherTRUMBULL MOBILE MEALS INC: $66,100 · OtherCHILDREN'S REHAB CENTER: $54,000 · Other+67 more: $677,150 · Other+67 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $65,250 · Human ServicesHospice of the Valley Inc: $44,000 · Human ServicesDEGAGE MINISTRIES: $7,500 · Human ServicesST MARY'S HOME: $5,000 · Human ServicesTRUMBULL FAMILY FITNESS: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $43,500 · EducationURSULINE COLLEGE: $22,500 · EducationTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $20,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $8,000 · EducationSt Alphonsus Parish Education Endowment: $6,500 · EducationCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $4,500 · EducationTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $4,500 · Education+2 more: $4,000 · EducationTHE WAY FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $13,000 · HealthMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SERV AGENCY: $13,000 · HealthTRUMBULL MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $9,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $8,500 · HealthCLEVELAND CLINIC MERCY HOSPITAL: $5,000 · Health+2 more: $2,500 · HealthJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MAHONING VALLEY: $24,500 · InternationalGRAND RAPIDS DOMINICAN SISTERS FOUNDATION: $6,000 · InternationalDisabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust: $25,000 · Public BenefitANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $16,000 · Animals
Other$1,358,750Human Services$131,750Education$114,000Health$51,000International$30,500Public Benefit$25,000Animals$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUMBULL MOBILE MEALS INC: $66,100 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $65,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley Inc: $44,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $43,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBEATITUDE HOUSE INC: $30,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetDisabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust: $25,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MAHONING VALLEY: $24,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetURSULINE COLLEGE: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $20,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $16,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WAY FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $13,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SERV AGENCY: $13,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetWARREN FAMILY MISSION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGREAT TRAIL COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTRUMBULL MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDEGAGE MINISTRIES: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSt Alphonsus Parish Education Endowment: $6,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetNILES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $6,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetST MARY'S HOME: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUMBULL FAMILY FITNESS: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCLEVELAND CLINIC MERCY HOSPITAL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELLA WOMENS CENTER: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCITRUS COUNTY 4-H ASSOCIATION INC: $3,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPLAIN PARTNERSHIP: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVIENNA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetEMMANUEL HOSPICE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHospice at Home Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN BLUE COATS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO HISTORY CONNECTION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUMBULL MOBILE MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of the Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds BEATITUDE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Charitable Service Trust ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MAHONING VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds URSULINE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds THE WAY FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SERV AGENCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Wm M & a Cafaro Family FoundationOH29.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · Premier Bank Foundation · Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · William J Bruder Trust Huntington National Bank · The Tim and Joni Woofter Family Foundation · Youngstown Fdn General · The Raymond John Wean Foundation · Community Foundation of Western Pennsylvania and Eastern Ohio · United Way of Trumbull County · Nancy Kaighin Van Fossan Family Foundation · The Albert M Covelli Foundation · Mahoning Valley Hospital Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization I J Van Huffel Foundation Xxxxxxxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from I J Van Huffel Foundation Xxxxxxxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on I J Van Huffel Foundation Xxxxxxxxx’s filings →

More from the funding graph