· Private foundation
The Albert M Covelli Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $174k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $217k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JOHN F KENNEDY CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $66,750 |
| ORLANDO HEALTH FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| CLEVELAND CLINIC | $50,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN | $50,000 |
| ST JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| NATIONAL VETERANS MEMORIAL & MUSEUM | $25,000 |
| ENVISION EXCELLENCE IN STEM EDUCATION | $20,000 |
| NATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $20,000 |
| ST TERESA OF CALCUTTA PARISH | $15,000 |
| ZOO TAMPA | $12,500 |
| AKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $11,000 |
| CHILDRENS CANCER CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| A KID'S PLACE | $10,000 |
| ADVENTURE CHURCH | $10,000 |
| ST MARGARET MARY CATHOLIC CHURCH | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $166k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OHOrlando Health Foundation Inc7× · 2017–2025 · $350k · revenue +139%
- AKA KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY INC4× · 2022–2025 · $70k · revenue +78%
- SJST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +644%
Funded once
- PBPanera Bread Foundation Incone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -30%
- NCNATIONWIDE CHILDREN'Sone grant, 2022 · $20k
- CCCLEVELAND CLINIC MARTIN HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children
Hospice of martin & st. lucie, inc. exists to provide hospice, grief counseling, education and other services to patients and families, dealing with death and dying so that they might live as fully and comfortably as possible. hospice…
St. mary's hospital for children ("smh"), the flagship of st. mary's healthcare system for children, is committed to improving the health and quality of life for children and young adults with special healthcare needs. a nationally…
Catholic palliative care services, inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of catholic hospice, inc. and under the sponsorship of the archdiocese of miami, provides responsive end-of-life care to patients and families in broward and dade…
To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
St. Marys Foundation for Children, Inc. is dedicated to the enhancement of health, safety and quality of life for children with special needs.
The mission of santafe healthcare, inc. is to serve as the not-for-profit system parent for its family of not-for-profit, mission-driven, affiliate organizations. see schedule o for continuation of the organization's mission. santafe…
Suncoast hospice's mission is to be the center to improve life for those touched by advanced illness, death, dying, grief, bereavement and other end-of-life issues.
We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. founded in community-based legacies of compassionate healing, we…
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hospice Foundation of Martin & St Lucie Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Orlando Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds A KID'S PLACE OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds Panera Bread Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WARREN FAMILY MISSION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc ↗
- Who funds ENVISION EXCELLENCE IN STEM EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds Library Foundation of Martin County ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MOLLY'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST OHIO ADOPTION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF MARTIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds TRUMBULL MOBILE MEALS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie Inc · Premier Bank Foundation · Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · Loblolly Community Foundation Inc · W and H Thomas Charitable Trust · The Bauman Family Foundation Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · The Tim and Joni Woofter Family Foundation · Allen Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Albert M Covelli Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Safespace Inc — 25% of income from government
- United Way of Martin County Inc — 4% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Martin County — 2% of income from government
- Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc — 0% of income from government
- Florida Oceanographic Society Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Albert M Covelli Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Albert M Covelli Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.