· Private foundation
William J Bruder Trust Huntington National Bank
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WARREN FAMILY MISSION | $20,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $10,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF TRUMBULL COUNTY | $5,000 |
| BELLA WOMEN'S CENTER | $5,000 |
| SISTER STELLA SHELTER FOR DOMESTIC | $5,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST OHIO | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| GREATER WARREN RESERVE COUNCIL | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| LIONS CLUB SIGHT SAVINGS PROGRAM | $4,000 |
| CHILDRENS REHAB CENTER | $3,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MAHONING COUN | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WFWARREN FAMILY MISSION9× · 2017–2025 · $138k · revenue +114%
- TFTRUMBULL FAMILY FITNESS6× · 2017–2022 · $46k · revenue +86%
- BWBELLA WOMENS CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +65%
Funded once
- TSTEEN STRAIGHT TALKone grant, 2017 · $5k
- SSSOMEPLACE SAFE INCone grant, 2017 · $5k
- BHBEATITUDE HOUSE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Striving for excellence in behavioral health and wellness.
The birth center dba lifecycle wellness and birth center is an independent non-profit organization and free-standing, out-of-hospital birth center. our team of midwives and nurse-practitioners provide empowering gynecology and…
Psychotherapy training and services
To promote a christ-centered view of life and sexuality by offering hope and healing to women, men, and their families so they are enabled to make positive, life-affirming choices.
Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.
Voluntary health & welfare
As followers of jesus, we provide all people of all ages unique opportunities where they may discover god's love for them, deepen relationships with one another, and explore this through high-quality outdoor programming, retreats,…
Provide complete and caring pregnancy services (without prejudice to religion, age, race, gender, marital status or income level) through its women's centers and prenatal care facility, as well as provide marriage enrichment, healthy…
Offer life-affirming choices for pregnancy and sexual health.
To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…
Girl scouts of silver sage council is a girl-led youth organization based in boise, idaho. the council, along with a team of 1,391 local volunteers, delivers relevant educational leadership programs that help build girls of courage,…
Public charity with a mission to save unborn lives, share the gospel and provide support to women with unplanned pregnancies.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beatitude House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Teen Straight Talk. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · I J Van Huffel Foundation Xxxxxxxxx · The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · Premier Bank Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization William J Bruder Trust Huntington National Bank funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.