Skip to content
I H & Anna Grancell Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

I H & Anna Grancell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$26kArts & Culture$10kHealth$7kHuman Services$7kReligion$5kCivil Rights$2kInternational$2kAnimals$650Other$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$15k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCLA Foundation$2,000
Trevor Project$2,000
Childrens Hospital of LA Foundation$1,200
Islamic Relief USA$1,000
Services Immigrant Rights and Education Network$1,000
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights$1,000
Los Angeles Jewish Home$1,000
Temple Menorah$700
UCLA Foundation$700
California Community Foundation$500
Pacific Clinics$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $350) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Covenant House California: $350 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27k · 11 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$27k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+27%

Still filing today

55%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE COLBURN SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +58%
  • SC
    SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +4%
  • PP
    PLAYFUL PEOPLE PRODUCTIONS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1k · revenue +243%

Funded once

  • SA
    STARTING ARTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +148%
  • FO
    Friends of Los Gatos Library
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    one grant, 2020 · $400 · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Communities in Schools of Los Angeles Inc

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. we work with public school systems, establishing relationship with superintendents, principals, educators, and community partners to…

Youth Development
3
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
4
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
5
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
6
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
7
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
8
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
9
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
10
California Western School of Law

California western school of law is an independent, aba/aals and wasc senior college and university commission (wscuc) accredited s.d. law school that prepares graduates for the practice of law through a carefully sequenced program of…

Education
11
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
12
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Islamic Relief Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UCLA FOUNDATION: $25,030 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $2,100 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION+1 more: $300 · EducationTEMPLE MENORAH: $4,700 · OtherTEMPLE MENORAHLos Angeles Jewish Home: $4,000 · OtherLos Angeles Jewish HomeJewish Home for the Ageing: $3,000 · OtherJewish Home for the AgeingChildrens Hospital of LA Foundation: $2,400 · OtherChildrens Hospital of LA Foundat…Pacific Clinics: $600 · Other+7 more: $2,850 · Other+7 moreTHE COLBURN SCHOOL: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COLBURN SCHOO…SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $2,500 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CULTURAL…PLAYFUL PEOPLE PRODUCTIONS: $1,250 · Arts & CulturePLAYFUL PEOPLE PR…WEST VALLEY YOUTH THEATER: $800 · Arts & CultureWEST VALLEY YOUTH…TREVOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Civil RightsCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $1,000 · Civil RightsISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $1,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $400 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $300 · InternationalSERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK (SIREN): $1,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $350 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $650 · Animals
Education$27,430Other$17,550Arts & Culture$9,550Civil Rights$3,000International$1,700Human Services$1,350Animals$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $25,030 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLBURN SCHOOL: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYFUL PEOPLE PRODUCTIONS: $1,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK (SIREN): $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VALLEY YOUTH THEATER: $800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARTING ARTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLos Gatos Music Boosters Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE9.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization I H & Anna Grancell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from I H & Anna Grancell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on I H & Anna Grancell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home