Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hyman Fund

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2022
33
Grants FY2022
8
States reached
$2k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

83% of Hyman Fund’s FY2023 grant dollars went to The Greater New Orleans Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 14 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Hyman Fund named its own grantees at scale: 21 organizations, $14k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

28
’17
25
’18
19
’19
14
’20
19
’21
21
’22
14
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$149kEducation$99kHealth$67kArts & Culture$56kHuman Services$15kInternational$8kCivil Rights$6kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2022 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION$2,000
TOURO INFIRMARY FOUNDATION$1,500
JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE$1,400
TULANE UNIVERSITY$1,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER$1,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$1,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$600
NEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART$520
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$500
ISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL$500
FUND FOR REFUGEE INITIATIVE$500
Individual grant recipient$300
BUREAU OF GOVERNMENTAL RESEARCH$250
SUSAN G KOMEN FOUNDATION$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $2k → 15%JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $1k → 15%JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $1k → 15%JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $1k → 15%JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $1k → 15%JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $1k → 15%JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $300 → 15%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $100 → 23%PROPELLER: $1k → 23%PROPELLER: $500 → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
OR
CT
CA
CO
VA
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$275k · 44 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2022, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
9

Total granted

$275k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+37%

Still filing today

57%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthInternationalEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +65%
  • TI
    TOURO INFIRMARY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $11k · revenue +79%
  • JC
    JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
5
Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana

The mission of the coalition to restore coastal louisiana (crcl) is to unite people in action to achieve a thriving, sustainable louisiana coast for all.

Environment
6
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
10
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
11
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
12
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
32/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANA: $50,250 · OtherJEWISH ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION OF LOUISIANAHARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL: $42,000 · OtherHARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOLYALE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYYALE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYHARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION: $8,500 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $8,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $8,000 · Other+36 more: $28,451 · Other+36 moreTHE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION: $73,740 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FO…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $20,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREAT…UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $200 · PhilanthropyNEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART: $54,090 · Arts & CultureNEW ORLEANS MU…+1 more: $660 · Arts & CulturePHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $40,000 · EducationPHILLIPS EXET…THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $6,500 · EducationTHE ADMINISTR…ISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL: $3,550 · EducationISIDORE NEWMA…TOURO INFIRMARY FOUNDATION: $10,500 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $900 · Health+2 more: $280 · HealthJEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $7,200 · Human ServicesSOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS OF NEW ORLEANS: $1,500 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $4,500 · Civil RightsSEMINARS AT STEAMBOAT: $2,300 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $350 · Civil Rights
Other$185,201Philanthropy$98,940Arts & Culture$54,750Education$50,050Health$11,680Human Services$8,800Civil Rights$7,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION: $73,740 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART: $54,090 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTOURO INFIRMARY FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE: $7,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL: $3,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEMINARS AT STEAMBOAT: $2,300 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBUREAU OF GOVERNMENTAL RESEARCH INC: $1,875 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetASHOKA: $1,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRECONCILE NEW ORLEANS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $780 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION INC: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAudubon Nature Institute Inc: $722 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $675 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $660 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC AFFAIRS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF ICIC A: $625 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $485 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $425 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $275 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $275 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $180 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE HOUSE CORPORATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAND IN HAND AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE CENTER FOR JEWISH-ARAB EDUCATION IN ISRA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS ↗
  • Who funds TOURO INFIRMARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH CHILDREN'S REGIONAL SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SEMINARS AT STEAMBOAT ↗
  • Who funds BUREAU OF GOVERNMENTAL RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS OF NEW ORLEANS ↗
  • Who funds ASHOKA ↗
  • Who funds RECONCILE NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN CRIME COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Audubon Nature Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC AFFAIRS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF ICIC A ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Goldring Family FoundationLA32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Goldring Family Foundation · The Usdin-Weil Foundation · Louis & Lillian Glazer Family Foundation · Luther and Zita Templeman Foundation · Woldenberg Foundation · Patrick F Taylor Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · The Steeg Family Foundation · Gustaf Westfeldt McIlhenny Family Founda · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Kirschman Foundation for Health and Education

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hyman Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hyman Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hyman Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Hyman Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hyman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph