Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hutchison Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2019 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$47k
Granted FY2019
16
Grants FY2019
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Religion$216kPublic Benefit$34kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kHuman Services$29kHealth$12kEducation$6kCivil Rights$5kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2019 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k15 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$629k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TURNING POINT USA$10,000
RISE UP 4 CHRIST INC$9,000
ROYAL POINCIANA CHAPEL$5,745
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE$4,950
TURNING POINT USA NFP$3,000
LIFE WORK LEADERSHIP ORLANDO$2,500
YOUNG LIFE$2,000
MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE$2,000
CRISTO REY BROOKLYN HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$600
Individual grant recipient$500
CHADWICK FOUNDATION$500
EPIC CHURCH$400
JOHNSON FERRY BAPTIST CHURCH$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIFE WORK LEADERSHIP ORLANDO: $3k → 13%RISE UP 4 CHRIST INC: $9k → 13%RISE UP 4 CHRIST INC: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
WI
NY
MO
MD
DE
AZ
NC
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$264k · 9 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -1% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
14

Total granted

$264k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
-1%

Still filing today

67%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationInternationalPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE
    2× · 2017–2019 · $174k · revenue -54%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $33k · revenue ×14
  • TR
    THE ROYAL POINCIANA CHAPEL INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $22k

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS - SFLORIDA REGION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • CA
    CANCER ALLIANCE OF HELP AND HOPE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +111%
  • EC
    EXCELSIS CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
3
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
4
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
5
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
6
Charis Bible College Inc

Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.

Religion
7
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
8
C4I Christians for Israel

To present a biblical perspective of god's plans and purpose for israel and the church

Religion
9
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
10
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
11
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
12
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Museum of the Bible. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE: $174,225 · OtherMUSEUM OF THE BIBLETURNING POINT USA INC: $33,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCAMERICAN RED CROSS - SFLORIDA REGION: $25,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS - SFLORIDA REGIONTHE ROYAL POINCIANA CHAPEL INC: $22,305 · OtherTHE ROYAL POINCIANA CHAPEL INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $9,600 · Other+14 more: $22,300 · Other+14 moreRise Up 4 Christ Inc: $14,000 · Human ServicesLIFEWORK LEADERSHIP ORLANDO INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCANCER ALLIANCE OF HELP AND HOPE INC: $11,000 · EducationThe Geneva School Inc: $4,990 · EducationEXCELSIS CENTER INC: $10,000 · ReligionTELLING THE TRUTH INC: $5,080 · ReligionYOUNG LIFE: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $1,000 · InternationalCHADWICK FOUNDATION: $750 · PhilanthropyRehabilitation Center for Children and Adults Inc: $250 · Health
Other$286,430Human Services$19,000Education$15,990Religion$15,080Youth Development$2,000International$1,000Philanthropy$750Health$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSEUM OF THE BIBLE: $174,225 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $33,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRise Up 4 Christ Inc: $14,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCANCER ALLIANCE OF HELP AND HOPE INC: $11,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEXCELSIS CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTELLING THE TRUTH INC: $5,080 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEWORK LEADERSHIP ORLANDO INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY BROOKLYN HIGH SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHADWICK FOUNDATION: $750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRehabilitation Center for Children and Adults Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Rise Up 4 Christ Inc ↗
  • Who funds CANCER ALLIANCE OF HELP AND HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds EXCELSIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TELLING THE TRUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWORK LEADERSHIP ORLANDO INC ↗
  • Who funds The Geneva School Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY BROOKLYN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHADWICK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Center for Children and Adults Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hutchison Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hutchison Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hutchison Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph