Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hussey Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$329k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$272k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$1.0MEducation$89kReligion$81kHealth$55kArts & Culture$46kHuman Services$33kRecreation & Sports$27kCommunity Improvement$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $39k
  • $250k+1 grant · $272k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Handler Family Charitable Fund$272,052
Handler Family Charitable Fund$38,752
Handler Family Charitable Fund$4,365
Strings Music Festival$2,500
Feeding the Foothills$2,000
Stand Up Placer$2,000
Ronald McDonald House Charities$2,000
Shriners Children's Northern Califo$2,000
Misericordia$2,000
Church of the Holy Comforter$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Shelter Box: $2k → 14%American Red Cross: $2k → 14%Honor Flight Chicago: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
IN
CA
CO
NE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$373k · 35 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
24

Total granted

$373k
$728k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+19%

Still filing today

63%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $317k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $46k · revenue +126%
  • SM
    STRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +239%
  • HP
    Houston Parks Board
    6× · 2017–2023 · $17k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • WL
    William L Hussey Donor Advised Fund
    one grant, 2024 · $243k
  • FL
    Frank L Hussey III Donor Advised Fu
    one grant, 2024 · $237k
  • MR
    Michael R Hussey Donor Advised Fund
    one grant, 2024 · $220k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
3
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
5
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
6
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
7
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
8
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
9
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
10
Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
11
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
12
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFood Pantries & AssistanceClassical Music EnsemblesDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Community Health CentersSubstance Abuse TreatmentChristian Missionary Organi…Rotary Club FoundationsVeteran Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Homeless Services & ShelterLand Conservation Organizat…Cancer Support OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsPublic University Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%43%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%32%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%42%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,527

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
30/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Handler Family Charitable Fund — $315,169 · OtherHandler Family Charitable FundWilliam L Hussey Donor Advised Fund — $243,492 · OtherWilliam L Hussey Donor Advised FundFrank L Hussey III Donor Advised Fu — $237,493 · OtherFrank L Hussey III Donor Advised FuMichael R Hussey Donor Advised Fund — $219,965 · OtherMichael R Hussey Donor Advised Fund+37 more — $216,140 · Other+37 moreBRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATION — $46,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $6,500 · EducationThe Kinkaid School Inc — $6,000 · EducationDePauw University — $4,500 · EducationBosque School — $3,000 · EducationSTRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL — $44,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $9,000 · HealthHELP MITO KIDS INC — $9,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $8,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $6,000 · HealthQUALITY LIVING INC — $3,750 · Health+4 more — $3,750 · HealthHouston Parks Board — $16,500 · PhilanthropyPlacer Community Foundation — $6,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC — $8,500 · EnvironmentHouston Arboretum & Nature Center — $1,500 · EnvironmentGalveston Bay Foundation Inc — $1,000 · EnvironmentHouston Golf Association Inc — $10,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,232,259Education$66,000Arts & Culture$45,500Health$39,500Philanthropy$22,500Environment$11,000Recreation & Sports$10,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATION — $46,000 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetSTRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL — $44,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHouston Parks Board — $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE-FREE RELATIONSHIPS — $12,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHouston Golf Association Inc — $10,500 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHELP MITO KIDS INC — $9,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetTHE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC — $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING THE FOOTHILLS — $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kinkaid School Inc — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPlacer Community Foundation — $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOPEWORKS — $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSt John's School — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDePauw University — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND UP PLACER INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetQUALITY LIVING INC — $3,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBosque School — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Arboretum & Nature Center — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Council on Recovery — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGalveston Bay Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEAVE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARANAM LLC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT A HERO INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMedical Bridges Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds STRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL
  • Who funds Houston Parks Board
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR VIOLENCE-FREE RELATIONSHIPS
  • Who funds Houston Golf Association Inc
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH
  • Who funds HELP MITO KIDS INC
  • Who funds THE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC
  • Who funds FEEDING THE FOOTHILLS
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds The Kinkaid School Inc
  • Who funds Placer Community Foundation
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds CENTRAL NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HOPEWORKS
  • Who funds St John's School
  • Who funds DePauw University
  • Who funds STAND UP PLACER INC
  • Who funds QUALITY LIVING INC
  • Who funds Bosque School
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds HOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX18.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Lee and Carol Tager Family Foundation · The Tapeats Fund · Marek Family Foundation · Strake Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · Washington Federal Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hussey Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hussey Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hussey Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph