Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Humble Heart-Gentle Soul Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$5.4MPhilanthropy$4.2MHealth$989kYouth Development$927kFood & Nutrition$775kHuman Services$768kReligion$706kHousing & Shelter$667kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+5 grants · $3.1M
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$60M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,241,500
LAKE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$1,035,346
VILLA ANGELA ST JOSEPH HIGH SCHOOL$330,000
CONVOY OF HOPE$250,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MN$250,000
BEAT THE STREETS CLEVELAND$100,000
HUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND$100,000
ST BEDE THE VENERABLE$100,000
NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES INC$100,000
CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND$100,000
CITY MISSION$100,000
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOU$100,000
TRANSPLANT HOUSE OF CLEVELAND$100,000
GREATER CLEVELAND SPORTS COMMISION$60,000
HOPE RECOVERY COMMUNITY$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $735k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF HEARTS: $44k → 11%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES INC: $100k → 9%JOSEPH & MARY'S HOME: $175k → 17%ST VINCENT CHARITY MEDICAL CENTER: $150k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $75k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $28k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES: $91k → 17%NORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES: $72k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
NY
OH
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.1M · 19 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
14

Total granted

$9.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
0%

Still filing today

63%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $866k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRANSPLANT HOUSE OF CLEVELAND
    5× · 2020–2025 · $500k · revenue +52%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $400k · revenue +392%
  • CC
    CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND
    4× · 2020–2025 · $400k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • JH
    JOSEPHS HOME
    one grant, 2024 · $175k · revenue 0%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT CHARITY MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -49%
  • RH
    REGINA HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Church Residences At Home Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

2
Wsnchs North Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
3
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

4
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
Hospice of Central Ohio

Patients of hospice of central ohio receive compassionate, individualized end-of-life care. their desires guide the physical, emotional, and spiritual care support we provide. members of our community, patient's families, children, and…

6
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

7
Faith Mission Inc

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Housing & Shelter
8
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
10
Ohio Living Holdings

See schedule oto provide older adults with caring and quality services toward enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well-being consistent with the christian gospel. the organization is dedicated to living our mission and keeping…

Human Services
11
Lifecare Hospice

The mission of hospice is to provide medical care, nursing care, pain relief, and emotional and spiritual support services to terminally ill patients and their families.

12
Good Shepherd Hospice

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Corporation and the most unlike its peers is International Network of Hearts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr15%14%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr14%17%35–55yr15%34%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%7%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr14%5%35–55yr15%74%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
14%
3,973/28,851

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAKE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $4,630,156 · OtherLAKE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,995,075 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONBEAT THE STREETS — $479,800 · OtherCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND — $400,000 · Other+22 more — $2,343,123 · Other+22 moreTRANSPLANT HOUSE OF CLEVELAND — $500,000 · HealthTHE TINY LIVES FOUNDATION — $300,000 · HealthREGINA HEALTH CENTER — $100,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100,000 · HealthED KEATING CENTER INC — $88,731 · HealthCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC — $50,000 · HealthNORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES INC — $262,620 · Human ServicesJOSEPHS HOME — $175,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT CHARITY MEDICAL CENTER — $150,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION — $75,000 · Human ServicesInternational Network of Hearts — $44,000 · Human ServicesWEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER — $28,000 · Human ServicesHUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $300,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $200,000 · Food & NutritionBEAT THE STREETS CLEVELAND — $400,000 · Recreation & SportsSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $400,000 · EducationCONVOY OF HOPE — $250,000 · International
Other$11,848,154Health$1,138,731Human Services$734,620Food & Nutrition$500,000Recreation & Sports$400,000Education$400,000International$250,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,995,075 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetTRANSPLANT HOUSE OF CLEVELAND — $500,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetBEAT THE STREETS CLEVELAND — $400,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND — $400,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetTHE TINY LIVES FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 3y, 32% of budgetHUNGER NETWORK OF GREATER CLEVELAND — $300,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetNORTH COAST COMMUNITY HOMES INC — $262,620 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJOSEPHS HOME — $175,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetECUMENICAL SHELTER NETWORK OF LAKE COUNTY INC — $154,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetST VINCENT CHARITY MEDICAL CENTER — $150,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOPE RECOVERY COMMUNITY — $150,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetI'M IN MINISTRY — $145,436 over 3y, 22% of budgetREGINA HEALTH CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLAKE HUMANE SOCIETY — $100,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetED KEATING CENTER INC — $88,731 over 1y, 13% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Network of Hearts — $44,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetFIRST GLANCE STUDENT CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH28.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Swagelok Foundation · Medwish Medworks · The Sam J Frankino Foundation · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Murphy Family Foundation · Community West Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · The Arthur B McBride Sr Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Humble Heart-Gentle Soul Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2024

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Humble Heart-Gentle Soul Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Humble Heart-Gentle Soul Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph