· Public charity
Humanities Texas
The mission of HUMANITIES TEXAS is educational excellence.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 29 grants below total $288,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $568,126 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $279,626 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $90k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $198k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER | $20,000 |
| CITY OF SAN ANTONIO | $15,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO FESTIVAL OF BOOKS | $15,000 |
| RANCHING HERITAGE ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| CITY OF EL PASO | $15,000 |
| SAN JACINTO MUSEUM AND BATTLEFIELD ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT | $12,000 |
| AMARILLO SYMPHONY | $11,250 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON | $10,000 |
| REMEMBERING BLACK DALLAS | $10,000 |
| THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON | $10,000 |
| HOUSTON FREEDMEN'S TOWN CONSERVANCY | $10,000 |
| TEXAS MARITIME MUSEUM ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| ASIA SOCIETY TEXAS CENTER | $10,000 |
| ROSENBERG RAILROAD MUSEUM | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $221k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WMWitte Museum3× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +370%
- TBTexas Book Festival3× · 2019–2021 · $47k · revenue +82%
- TMTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON4× · 2017–2025 · $44k · revenue +96%
Funded once
- DHDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museumone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
- STSOUTH TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR THE ARTSgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue +173%
- MOMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWESTgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
historic preservation and education
Through unique collections, exhibitions, public programs and outreach in the visual arts, the mission of the Art Museum of Southeast Texas is to provide education, inspiration and creative visions throughout Southeast Texas.
Foster the history, art, culture, & humanities of the brenham-washington county, tx region.
Preservation and education of history and historical items of interest for the citizens and visitors of sherman, tx.
The Museum of Western Art in the Texas Hill Country is dedicated to excellence in the collection, preservation and display of Western art.
To provide the general public with the rich heart of texas heritage
The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…
To collect, explore, collect and interpret and exhibit the material and intellectual culture in Houston, the Southwest and African Diaspora for current and future generations for all people.
Preserve the history of brazoria county, texas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Western Art Foundation Briscoe Western Art Museum and the most unlike its peers is Ellis County African American Hall. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
119 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 119 of the 154 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Texas Folklife Resources ↗
- Who funds Witte Museum ↗
- Who funds Texas Book Festival ↗
- Who funds THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WESTERN ART FOUNDATION BRISCOE WESTERN ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY ARCHIVE AND MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BRYAN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds DR PEPPER MUSEUM AND FREE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds San Jacinto Museum and Battlefield Association ↗
- Who funds PANHANDLE-PLAINS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PUERTO RICAN FOLKLORIC DANCE INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS HISTORY ↗
- Who funds Gemini Series Inc ↗
- Who funds MEXIC-ARTE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Harrison County Historical Society ↗
- Who funds DON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Houston Freedmen's Town Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum ↗
- Who funds AMARILLO SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds TOM LEA INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CORPUS CHRISTI MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY ↗
- Who funds TEATRO DE ARTES DE JUAN SEGUIN ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds EL PROGRESO LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds National Center for Childrens Illustrated Literat ↗
- Who funds FORT BEND HISTORY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO CONSERVATION SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Ranching Heritage Association ↗
- Who funds SAN ELIZARIO GENEALOGY & HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Summerlee Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Union Pacific Foundation · Texas Historical Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Houston Arts Alliance · Greater Austin Performing Arts Center Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Still Water Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · The Moody Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Humanities Texas funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.