Skip to content

New York · Public charity

Human Services Council of New York

Hsc strengthens new york's nonprofit human services sector, ensuring new yorkers from all walks of life, across diverse neighborhoods, cultures, and generations reach their full potential.

$200k
Granted FY2017
16
Grants FY2017
16
Organizations funded FY2017
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2017
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2017
$20,000
States reached, FY2017
1
Total assets, FY2017
$1.6M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2017, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Human Services Council of New York supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBrooklyn Bureau of Community Service: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSocial Science Research Council: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHenry Street Settlement: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCamba Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen's Housing & Economic Development Corporation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCouncil of Senior Centers and Services of New York City Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNonprofit Finance Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater New York: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Committee for Hispanic Children and Families Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGraham Windham: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDowntown Brooklyn Partnership Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGrand Street Settlement Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGood Shepherd Services: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercyfirst: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY17.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Expanded Schools Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · United Way of New York City · Food Bank for New York City · Open Society Institute · Jewish Communal Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Human Services Council of New York with peer funders

About Human Services Council of New York

How much does Human Services Council of New York give?
Human Services Council of New York reported 16 grants totaling $200,000 in its FY2017 IRS filing.
What does Human Services Council of New York fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2017, its largest causes are Human Services (60%), Community Improvement (20%), Social Science (10%).
Who are Human Services Council of New York's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2017: Brooklyn Bureau of Community Service ($20k), Social Science Research Council ($20k), Henry Street Settlement ($20k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Human Services Council of New York?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jpmorgan Chase Foundation, The Ford Foundation, Expanded Schools Inc.
Where is Human Services Council of New York based?
Human Services Council of New York is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Human Services Council of New York’s filings →

More from the funding graph