Skip to content

· Public charity

Human Coalition

HUMAN COALITION is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization working to assist women and their families with the concerns and needs of an unexpected pregnancy and early childhood care as well as engaging culture to advance a life-affirming ethic.

$119k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Civil Rights$198kHuman Services$45kInternational$37kEducation$21kReligion$15kPublic Benefit$10kSocial Science$6k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $77,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $119,270 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $42,270 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
$9,250
Median grant
5
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LET THEM LIVE ACTION CORPORATION$45,000
PROLOVE MINISTRIES$11,000
EVERYLIFE INC$9,250
NORTH CAROLINA FAITH & FREEDOM COALITION$6,250
THE DANBURY INSTITUTE$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LET THEM LIVE ACTION CORPORATION: $45k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
CO
MO
VA
MD
AR
TN
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$229k · 4 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$229k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+26%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsHuman ServicesReligionEducationInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NC FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $152k · revenue -59% · 27% of their budget
  • EL
    EVERY LIFE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $37k · revenue 0%
  • DL
    Douglass Leadership Institute Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $21k · revenue +241%

Funded once

  • LA
    LIVE ACTION
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +12%
  • FP
    FAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • TC
    TABERNACLE CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
2
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
3
Pro-Life Action League Inc

Dissemination of pro-life information

Civil Rights
4
Life Advancement Group

To rescue lives from the destruction of abortion through innovative marketing, strategy, and technology solutions.

—
5
Pro-Life Action Ministries Inc

Pro-Life Action Ministries, Inc. is an interdenominational Christian organization dedicated to publicly defending the sanctity of human life & saving lives from abortion, infanticide & euthanasia through peaceful direct-action & education…

—
6
Choose Life of North Alabama Inc

Our mission is to offer gospel-focused, life-affirming choices, education and compassionate counsel to those facing pregnancy related decisions.

—
7
A Choice for Life Inc

Bsideu for life is committed to presenting the gospel of our lord in word and deed by educating women facing crisis pregnancies, responding to their needs and protecting the lives of unborn children.bsideu for life also equips mothers and…

—
8
Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc

Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.

—
9
Triad Coalition for Life

We work to bring help and hope to women and families facing a crisis preganacy by offering life-affirming services and resources. To support this goal, we have built a local network of partner ministries and pregnancy care centers.

Religion
10
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
11
Liberty Counsel Action

Liberty Counsel Actions mission is to advance religious freedom the sanctity of human life the family responsible government national security and support for Israel through education and advocacy on the national state and local levels.

—
12
Indiana Right to Life Incorporated

To educate the public about abortion

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Students for Life of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nc Faith and Freedom Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NC FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION: $151,750 · ReligionNC FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITIONLET THEM LIVE ACTION CORPORATION: $45,000 · Human ServicesLET THEM LIVE ACTIO…PROLOVE MINISTRIES: $11,000 · Human ServicesPROLOVE MINISTRIESEVERY LIFE INC: $36,900 · InternationalEVERY LIFE I…Students for Life of America Inc: $20,000 · Civil RightsStudents fo…LIVE ACTION: $15,000 · Civil RightsLIVE ACTIONDouglass Leadership Institute Inc: $20,500 · EducationTABERNACLE CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST: $7,500 · OtherCHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST INC: $7,500 · OtherDANBURY INSTITUTE: $5,500 · OtherFAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Religion$151,750Human Services$56,000International$36,900Civil Rights$35,000Education$20,500Other$20,500Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNC FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION: $151,750 over 3y, 27% of budgetEVERY LIFE INC: $36,900 over 2y, 12% of budgetDouglass Leadership Institute Inc: $20,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIVE ACTION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Human Coalition funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Human Coalition. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Human Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph