Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Human Coalition

HUMAN COALITION is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization working to assist women and their families with the concerns and needs of an unexpected pregnancy and early childhood care as well as engaging culture to advance a life-affirming ethic.

$119k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Civil Rights$198kHuman Services$45kInternational$37kEducation$21kReligion$15kPublic Benefit$10kSocial Science$6k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $77,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $119,270 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $42,270 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
$9,250
Median grant
5
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LET THEM LIVE ACTION CORPORATION$45,000
PROLOVE MINISTRIES$11,000
EVERYLIFE INC$9,250
NORTH CAROLINA FAITH & FREEDOM COALITION$6,250
THE DANBURY INSTITUTE$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LET THEM LIVE ACTION CORPORATION: $45k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IN
CO
MO
VA
MD
AR
TN
NC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$229k · 4 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$229k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+26%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsHuman ServicesReligionEducationInternationalPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NC FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $152k · revenue -59% · 27% of their budget
  • EL
    EVERY LIFE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $37k · revenue 0%
  • DL
    Douglass Leadership Institute Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $21k · revenue +241%

Funded once

  • LA
    LIVE ACTION
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +12%
  • FP
    FAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • TC
    TABERNACLE CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST
    one grant, 2022 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
2
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
3
Pro-Life Action League Inc

Dissemination of pro-life information

Civil Rights
4
Life Advancement Group

To rescue lives from the destruction of abortion through innovative marketing, strategy, and technology solutions.

5
Pro-Life Action Ministries Inc

Pro-Life Action Ministries, Inc. is an interdenominational Christian organization dedicated to publicly defending the sanctity of human life & saving lives from abortion, infanticide & euthanasia through peaceful direct-action & education…

6
Choose Life of North Alabama Inc

Our mission is to offer gospel-focused, life-affirming choices, education and compassionate counsel to those facing pregnancy related decisions.

7
A Choice for Life Inc

Bsideu for life is committed to presenting the gospel of our lord in word and deed by educating women facing crisis pregnancies, responding to their needs and protecting the lives of unborn children.bsideu for life also equips mothers and…

8
Global Impact Ministries Inc Dba Love Life

Love Life is uniting and mobilizing the church to create a culture of love and life that will bring an end to abortion and the orphan crisis.

Religion
9
Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc

Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.

10
Triad Coalition for Life

We work to bring help and hope to women and families facing a crisis preganacy by offering life-affirming services and resources. To support this goal, we have built a local network of partner ministries and pregnancy care centers.

Religion
11
Liberty Counsel Action

Liberty Counsel Actions mission is to advance religious freedom the sanctity of human life the family responsible government national security and support for Israel through education and advocacy on the national state and local levels.

12
Life Matters Worldwide

Life Matters Worldwide encourages, equips and strengthens pregnancy care workers so they can continue to provide life-affirming services.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Students for Life of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nc Faith and Freedom Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NC FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION — $151,750 · ReligionNC FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITIONLET THEM LIVE ACTION CORPORATION — $45,000 · Human ServicesLET THEM LIVE ACTIO…PROLOVE MINISTRIES — $11,000 · Human ServicesPROLOVE MINISTRIESEVERY LIFE INC — $36,900 · InternationalEVERY LIFE I…Students for Life of America Inc — $20,000 · Civil RightsStudents fo…LIVE ACTION — $15,000 · Civil RightsLIVE ACTIONDouglass Leadership Institute Inc — $20,500 · EducationTABERNACLE CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST — $7,500 · OtherCHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST INC — $7,500 · OtherDANBURY INSTITUTE — $5,500 · OtherFAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Public Benefit
Religion$151,750Human Services$56,000International$36,900Civil Rights$35,000Education$20,500Other$20,500Public Benefit$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNC FAITH AND FREEDOM COALITION — $151,750 over 3y, 27% of budgetEVERY LIFE INC — $36,900 over 2y, 12% of budgetDouglass Leadership Institute Inc — $20,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIVE ACTION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY POLICY ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Human Coalition funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph