Skip to content
Huiying Memorial Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Huiying Memorial Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$156k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.6MEducation$706kHuman Services$47kInternational$28kPhilanthropy$20kArts & Culture$17kPublic Benefit$525Other$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $151k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$42,400
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION$31,316
FAR AWAY PROJECTS$27,700
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$25,000
SOCIAL GOOD FUND$15,000
BALLET AFTER DARK$10,000
ALLURE ALLIANCE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAR AWAY PROJECTS: $28k → 12%DEBRIEFING THE FRONT LINES: $5k → 9%DIGNITY MATTERS: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
MD
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 9 repeat orgs$490k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
17

Total granted

$2.9M
$388k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
0%

Still filing today

56%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthSocial SciencePublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Wellesley College
    3× · 2017–2023 · $300k · revenue +63%
  • BI
    BUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +21%
  • CF
    COLLEGEBOUND FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • CS
    CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR EDUCATING GIRLS OF RURAL CHINA
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • PS
    PINEWOOD SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $59k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Ballet Inc

The heart of Boston Ballet is the human experience. Through our living and breathing art, we forge human connections-between artist and attendee, teacher and trainee, friend and newcomer, one's outer and inner self. Dance history is human…

Arts & Culture
2
International Womens Writing Guild

IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing

Education
3
Verily Magazine Inc

Verilys mission is to further honesty ethics and authenticity in womens media. One of Verilys journalistic goals is to ameliorate unhealthy standards for womens physical appearances which have been promoted for decades leading to…

Civil Rights
4
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
5
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
6
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
7
Visceral Dance Chicago Nfp

Visceral Dance Chicago is a contemporary company dedicated to providing a comprehensive environment designed to cultivate dance education, creation and performance for choreographers, dancers, and artists.

Arts & Culture
8
Continental Ballet Company

Continental Ballet Company's mission is to enrich the community by advancing the art of classical ballet through professional performances, dancer development, and educational programs. Every effort is made to make the art of ballet…

—
9
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
10
Midwives College of Utah

Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.

Education
11
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
12
Inseparable Inc

Inseparable Inc is focused on creating a world where mental health is treated as a critical and equal piece of overall health, and where systems are designed with their impact on mental health in mind. Inseparable, Inc. is a growing…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ballet After Dark Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Allure Alliance Inc Random Black Girls. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
8/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $2,050,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALNEWTON WELLESLEY HOSPITAL: $300,000 · OtherNEWTON WELLESLEY HOSPITALCANADIAN SOCIETY FOR EDUCATING GIRLS OF RURAL CHINA: $100,000 · OtherPINEWOOD SCHOOL: $100,000 · Other+13 more: $319,558 · Other+13 moreWellesley College: $300,000 · EducationWellesley Colle…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $99,000 · EducationMassachusetts I…HILLBROOK SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationHILLBROOK SCHOO…+2 more: $25,000 · EducationBUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING: $100,000 · Social ScienceFAR AWAY PROJECTS: $27,700 · Human ServicesDignity Matters Inc: $10,368 · Human ServicesDEBRIEFING THE FRONT LINES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesBALLET AFTER DARK INCORPORATED: $15,515 · HealthINSPIRATIONALLY GRIEVING MY BABY INC: $5,000 · HealthChinese Performing Arts of America: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN DOCUMENTARY FUND: $5,000 · Arts & CulturePEOPLE MATTER: $525 · Public Benefit
Other$2,869,558Education$474,000Social Science$100,000Human Services$43,068Health$20,515Arts & Culture$11,000Public Benefit$525

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWellesley College: $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $99,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealth Care Without Walls Inc: $67,445 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetHILLBROOK SCHOOL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLEGEBOUND FOUNDATION: $30,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAR AWAY PROJECTS: $27,700 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetBALLET AFTER DARK INCORPORATED: $15,515 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDignity Matters Inc: $10,368 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAllure Alliance Inc Random Black Girls: $10,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetChinese Performing Arts of America: $6,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetINSPIRATIONALLY GRIEVING MY BABY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetSOUTHERN DOCUMENTARY FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPEOPLE MATTER: $525 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA12.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Huiying Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Huiying Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Huiying Memorial Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Huiying Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Huiying Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home