Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hughie & Selma Black Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$34kYouth Development$16kHousing & Shelter$5kEducation$2kHealth$1kInternational$500
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$75k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP GAN ISRAEL$2,000
PROJECT HOME$1,500
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$1,000
VARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY$1,000
EXPERIENCE CAMPS$500
PINE TREE SOCIETY$500
GOLDEN SLIPPERS CLUB$275
THE FRESH AIR FUND$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%PROJECT HOME: $2k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $2k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$35k · 6 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$35k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+5%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +52%
  • CG
    CAMP GAN ISRAEL INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue ×77
  • PH
    PROJECT HOME
    3× · 2021–2024 · $5k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • P
    PEEC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • JF
    JEWISH FED OF GREATER PHILLY
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gan Israel Chabad Inc

Operation of summer day camp and overnight camp which combines activities with a Torah education

Recreation & Sports
2
Golden Slipper Camp

Organized for the purpose of maintaining and operating camping facilities for children in the greater philadelphia area.

Recreation & Sports
3
Project Camp Inc

Instilling inspiration and empowerment, while enhancing the lives of children with serious illnesses.

Health
4
University Camps

Unicamp student volunteers harness the healing power of the wilderness to provide a unique outdoor camping experience for at-risk children. through relationship-building, leadership and character development, and just plain fun, unicamp…

5
Camp Kanesatake

To help the local church evangelize and disciple their youth and to strengthen their families to be conformed to the image of christ through the nondenominational ministry of the organization.

Recreation & Sports
6
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

7
Camp Ramah in the Poconos

Camp ramah's mission is to create a nurturing, safe, fun-filled, vibrant jewish community that inspires the education, social, cultural, moral, physical, and emotional growth of campers and staff, fostering life-long jewish identity. ramah…

Recreation & Sports
8
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
9
Camp Casco Inc

Camp Casco builds community for families affected by childhood cancer in New England through free camps and social opportunities.

Recreation & Sports
10
Camp Hasc Inc

Camp hasc provides an overnight summer program for special needs individuals.camp hasc is unique in its ability to meet the complex personal, social, therapeutic and medical needs of our very special individuals.

Religion
11
Variety the Children's Charity of the Delaware Valley

To build independence and self-confidence in children and youth with disabilities by engaging them in vocational, recreational, social, and educational enrichment activities, while connecting families to resources. variety serves children…

Recreation & Sports
12
Rising Treetops At Oakhurst

To enhance the quality of life for children and adults with special needs, including autism and physical and intellectual disabilities, and provide respite for their families through a year-round camp experience, based in monmouth county,…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fresh Air Fund and the most unlike its peers is Variety the Childrens Charity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PEEC — $10,000 · OtherPEECJEWISH FEDERATION — $7,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONCAMP GAN ISRAEL — $6,000 · OtherCAMP GAN ISRAELCAMP GAN ISRAEL INC — $4,900 · OtherCAMP GAN ISRAEL INCFOUNDATION OF JEWISH CAMPS — $3,500 · OtherFOUNDATION OF JEWISH CAMPS+5 more — $3,335 · Other+5 moreSUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentSUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROM…+1 more — $500 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT HOME — $4,500 · Human ServicesJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · EducationPINE TREE SOCIETY INC — $500 · EducationGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC — $500 · Recreation & SportsFRESH AIR FUND — $250 · Recreation & Sports
Other$35,235Youth Development$15,500Human Services$4,500Education$1,500Recreation & Sports$750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT HOME — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVariety the Childrens Charity — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINE TREE SOCIETY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL CAMPS AFRICA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hughie & Selma Black Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hughie & Selma Black Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hughie & Selma Black Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph