· Private foundation
Huebscher Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL OF BETHLEHEM FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| BETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD ALUMNI ASSN | $5,000 |
| CHAI LIFELINE | $5,000 |
| GRANDMA'S PLACE INC | $5,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS | $5,000 |
| TREVOR PROJECT | $3,500 |
| CHILDREN'S AID | $3,000 |
| OPEN BOOK | $3,000 |
| NEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC | $2,000 |
| GAMERS OUTREACH FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| WASHINGTON TENNIS & EDUCATION | $1,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC | $1,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF PAGOSA SPRINGS INC | $1,000 |
| CHILD'S PLAY | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JAMAICA INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TKTHE KENYON REVIEW6× · 2019–2024 · $129k · revenue +52%
- CLCHAI LIFELINE INC7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +38%
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +112%
Funded once
- TCTRINITY COLLEGEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +69%
- HFHOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL OFone grant, 2019 · $11k
- HPHUNTS POINT ALLIANCEone grant, 2019 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
The healthwise mission is to help people make better health decisions.
At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is TrustBridge Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Humane Society of Pagosa Springs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE KENYON REVIEW ↗
- Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
- Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Grandmas Place Inc ↗
- Who funds PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY SUPPORT TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds THE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLACE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds MOVEMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN OF ALICE INC ↗
- Who funds EAGLES WINGS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WHYHUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds TrustBridge Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD'S PLAY ↗
- Who funds Open Book ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Town of Palm Beach United Way Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC ↗
- Who funds CAMFED USA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Jamaica Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COLUMBIA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Huebscher Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Grandmas Place Inc — 12% of income from government
- Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Place of Hope Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.