Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hubert & Ludmila Schlesinger Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Housing & Shelter$251kHuman Services$168kEmployment$65kFood & Nutrition$28kArts & Culture$27kHealth$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $49k
$9,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Oregon Community Warehouse$20,000
Hollywood Senior Center$18,000
Mother and Child Education Center$10,500
Dress for Success of Oregon Inc$9,500
Habitat for Humanity Portland Regio$7,500
Northwest Children's Theater and Sc$5,000
Sunshine Division Inc$4,000
Oregon Food Bank Inc$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $323k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Dress for Success of Oregon Inc: $10k → 12%DRESS FOR SUCCESS OF OREGON INC: $9k → 12%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $9k → 12%Dress for Success of Oregon Inc: $9k → 12%DRESS FOR SUCCESS OF OREGON INC: $8k → 12%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $7k → 12%DRESS FOR SUCCESS OF OREGON INC: $7k → 12%DRESS FOR SUCCESS: $7k → 12%Oregon Community Warehouse: $20k → 12%Hollywood Senior Center: $18k → 12%Hollywood Senior Center: $17k → 12%Oregon Community Warehouse: $17k → 12%HOLLYWOOD SENIOR CENTER: $17k → 12%HOLLYWOOD SENIOR CENTER: $16k → 12%OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $16k → 12%HOLLYWOOD SENIOR CENTER: $16k → 12%HOLLYWOOD SENIOR CENTER: $16k → 12%OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $16k → 12%OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $16k → 12%HOLLYWOOD SENIOR CENTER: $15k → 12%OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $15k → 12%HOLLYWOOD SENIOR CENTER: $14k → 12%HOLLYWOOD SENIOR CENTER: $14k → 12%OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $10k → 12%OREGON COMMUNITY WAREHOUSE: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$564k · 11 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$564k
$2k

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    Hollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging
    9× · 2017–2025 · $142k · revenue +126%
  • Oregon Community Warehouse Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $117k · revenue +155%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST
    5× · 2021–2025 · $76k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Earth Day Oregon
2
Metro Portland New Car Dealers Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Impact Nw

Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

Human Services
4
Jubilee Hall Pdx
Employment
5
Home Court Nw
Recreation & Sports
6
Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services
7
Our Village Gardens

Our village gardens brings a spirit of hope to the people by growing and sharing food, learning and teaching skills, and empowering community leadership.(continued on schedule o)our village gardens leverages community organizing, skill…

Food & Nutrition
8
Bend-Redmond Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Bend-Redmond Habitat for Humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter
9
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
10
Furnish Hope Inc

Furnish hope creates awareness about essential home furnishing insecurity as well as transform empty houses into welcoming homes for families. together, we furnish hope.

Human Services
11
Operation Nightwatch - Portland

Operation Nightwatch provides nighttime hospitality for Portland's unhoused population. For a few evenings a week, staff and volunteers at thehospitality center provide a safe place, food, socks, blankets, medical care, and welcome our…

Health
12
Family and Community Together

Fact oregon empowers families, youth, and communities to navigate disability systems, advocating together for disability justice and policy change so that people with disabilities have what they need to thrive at home, in school, and in…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging and the most unlike its peers is Oregon Community Warehouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Hollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging — $141,500 · Human ServicesHollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive AgingOregon Community Warehouse Inc — $117,000 · Human ServicesOregon Community Warehouse IncDress for Success Oregon — $64,500 · Human ServicesDress for Success OregonWILLAMETTE WEST HABITAT HUMAN — $58,500 · OtherWILLAMETTE WEST HABITAT HU…MOTHER & CHILD EDUCATION CENTER — $26,000 · OtherMOTHER & CHILD EDUCATION C…NW CHILDREN'S THTR SCHL — $26,000 · OtherNW CHILDREN'S THTR SCHLNorthwest Children's Theater and Sc — $11,000 · OtherNorthwest Children's Theat…OREGON FOOD BANK — $9,500 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANK+1 more — $1,590 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST — $75,500 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUM…SUNSHINE DIVISION INC — $18,000 · Crime & LegalNORTHWEST CHILDREN'S THEATER AND SCHOOL INC — $16,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$323,000Other$132,590Housing & Shelter$75,500Crime & Legal$18,000Arts & Culture$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging — $141,500 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetOregon Community Warehouse Inc — $117,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST — $75,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDress for Success Oregon — $64,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetMOTHER & CHILD EDUCATION CENTER — $26,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetSUNSHINE DIVISION INC — $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST CHILDREN'S THEATER AND SCHOOL INC — $16,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging
  • Who funds Oregon Community Warehouse Inc
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST
  • Who funds Dress for Success Oregon
  • Who funds MOTHER & CHILD EDUCATION CENTER
  • Who funds SUNSHINE DIVISION INC
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CHILDREN'S THEATER AND SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR18.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Autzen Foundation · The Holzman Foundation · Oregon Jewish Community Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hubert & Ludmila Schlesinger Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 21%
  • Oregon Community Warehouse Inc24% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East14% of income from government
  • Hollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hubert & Ludmila Schlesinger Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hubert & Ludmila Schlesinger Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph