Skip to content
Huber Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Huber Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$13MHealth$5.3MCrime & Legal$2.9MEducation$110kPhilanthropy$100kCommunity Improvement$65k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
  • $250k+7 grants · $3.5M
$400,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$80M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Center For Reproductive Rights$750,000
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation$750,000
National Abortion Federation$500,000
National Women's Law Center$450,000
Planned Parenthood Federation of America$400,000
National Partnership for Women and Families$300,000
NARAL Pro-Choice America Foundation$300,000
Feminist Majority Foundation$200,000
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%IfWhenHow: $250k → 10%Planned Parenthood Federation of America: $500k → 17%National Abortion Federation: $500k → 14%Feminist Majority Foundation: $200k → 7%Planned Parenthood Federation of America: $500k → 17%National Abortion Federation: $500k → 14%Feminist Majority Foundation: $200k → 7%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA: $500k → 17%NARAL Pro-Choice America Foundation: $350k → 14%Feminist Majority Foundation: $200k → 7%Planned Parenthood Federation of America: $500k → 17%NARAL Pro-Choice America Foundation: $350k → 14%Feminist Majority Foundation: $200k → 7%Planned Parenthood Federation of America: $500k → 17%National Partnership for Women and Families: $300k → 14%Planned Parenthood Federation of America: $400k → 17%National Abortion Federation: $350k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA: $425k → 17%National Partnership for Women and Families: $300k → 14%Center For Reproductive Rights: $750k → 17%NARAL Pro-Choice America Foundation: $350k → 14%Center For Reproductive Rights: $700k → 17%National Partnership for Women and Families: $275k → 14%Center For Reproductive Rights: $600k → 17%NARAL Pro-Choice America Foundation: $300k → 14%Center For Reproductive Rights: $600k → 17%National Partnership for Women and Families: $275k → 14%Center For Reproductive Rights: $500k → 17%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA FOUNDATION: $300k → 14%CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS: $400k → 17%CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS: $300k → 17%National Abortion Federation: $250k → 14%American Civil Liberties Union Foundation: $750k → 17%American Civil Liberties Union Foundation: $750k → 17%NARAL Pro-Choice America Foundation: $250k → 14%American Civil Liberties Union Foundation: $750k → 17%American Civil Liberties Union Foundation: $600k → 17%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA FOUNDATION: $225k → 14%American Civil Liberties Union Foundation: $500k → 17%National Women's Law Center: $450k → 14%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION: $400k → 17%National Women's Law Center: $450k → 14%AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION: $300k → 17%National Women's Law Center: $450k → 14%National Women's Law Center: $450k → 14%National Women's Law Center: $425k → 14%NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $375k → 14%NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $300k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 12 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -42% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$21M
$250k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-42%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +102%
  • THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +69%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • I
    IFWHENHOW
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
2
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
3
National Network of Abortion Funds Inc

The national network of abortion funds (nnaf) is determined to build a world where all reproductive options are valued, accessible, and stigma-free. we believe all people know how to best care for their own bodies and build their own…

Environment
4
National Institute for Reproductive Health Action Fund Inc

The national institute for reproductive health action fund conducts non-partisan issue advocacy and electoral engagement to advance reproductive health, rights, and justice in states and cities across the country. nirh action fund builds…

—
5
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
6
National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc

National institute for reproductive health, inc. works to protect and advance equitable access to reproductive health care by building power at the state and local level. using an approach that is rooted in partnerships with state and…

Civil Rights
7
Pregnancy Justice Inc

Pregnancy justice advances and defends the rights of pregnant people, no matter if they give birth, experience a pregnancy loss, or have an abortion. we advance our mission in four ways: by providing criminal defense, by advocating for…

Civil Rights
8
National Partnership for Women & Families Action Fund

The action fund engages in legislative advocacy, voter education, grassroots organizing and other activities to promote fairness in the workplace, reproductive health and rights, access to quality, affordable health care and policies that…

Human Services
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
American Civil Liberties Union of Florida Inc

To promote civil liberties through communication and interaction with and between the citizens and legislators of the state of florida

Civil Rights
11
Planned Parenthood North Central States Foundation

To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.

Human Services
12
Planned Parenthood Global Inc

To advance the planned parenthood mission internationally, including support for the provision and protection of sexual and reproductive health services and rights, and ensuring that all people have access to reproductive and sexual…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Women's Law Center; the most unlike its peers is Feminist Majority Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $2,900,000 · OtherNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTERREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $2,125,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATIONNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $1,600,000 · OtherNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATIONNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $1,475,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIESFEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION: $1,300,000 · OtherFEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATIONAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $4,050,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION I…THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $3,850,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC+2 more: $400,000 · Civil RightsPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,325,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD …Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: $340,000 · HealthPlanned Parenthood …HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $110,000 · EducationHOPEWELL FUND: $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $65,000 · Community Improvement
Other$9,400,000Civil Rights$8,300,000Health$3,665,000Education$110,000Philanthropy$100,000Community Improvement$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $4,050,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $3,850,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,325,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $2,900,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $2,125,000 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $1,600,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetNATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $1,475,000 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetFEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION: $1,300,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: $340,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetIFWHENHOW: $250,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Susan Thompson Bu…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
The Susan Thompson Buffett FoundationNE13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Huber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Huber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Huber Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Huber Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Huber’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home