Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Howard L Gottlieb Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$546kRecreation & Sports$40kReligion$15kInternational$10kEducation$2kCrime & Legal$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,009
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC$5,009
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARTSMART: $10k → 22%NEW ISRAEL FUND: $5k → 17%SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $5k → 14%PALM BEACH OPERA: $5k → 11%MIDWEST YOUNG ARTISTS CONSERVATORY: $500 → 8%CHICAGO PHILHARMONIC: $3k → 14%MOUNT VERNON VIRTUOSI: $3k → 11%THE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM: $50k → 17%ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $34k → 14%BRENNAN CENTER OF JUSTICE: $500 → 17%CEDILLE RECORDS: $12k → 14%PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM: $25k → 17%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $25k → 14%PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM: $25k → 17%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $25k → 14%MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $25k → 14%MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $25k → 14%MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $5k → 14%CONGREGATION SUKKAT SHALOM: $15k → 14%THE CHICAGO SCHOOL OF VIOLIN MAKING: $5k → 14%LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO: $200k → 14%CHICAGO SCHOOL OF VIOLIN MAKING: $5k → 14%MITCHELL MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN: $36k → 14%CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $25k → 14%MILLENIUM PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MILENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MILLENIUM PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MILENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE JOFFREY BALLET: $3k → 14%THE JOFFREY BALLET: $3k → 14%THE JOFFREY BALLET: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$288k · 6 repeat orgs$335k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +147% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
13

Total granted

$288k
$333k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+147%
+43%

Still filing today

100%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +147%
  • CS
    Chicago Symphony Orchestra
    3× · 2021–2024 · $75k · revenue +15%
  • MS
    MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue ×16

Funded once

  • LO
    Lyric Opera of Chicagograduated
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +72%
  • GI
    GICHIGAMIIN INDIGENOUS NATIONS MUSEUM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $36k · revenue +382%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGOgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $34k · revenue +43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
2
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
3
Cleveland Institute of Music

The cleveland institute of music's mission is to empower the world's most talented classical music students to fulfill their dreams and potential.

Education
4
Musicmi

At MusicMi we set a mission for ourselves to provide aspiring young musicians from across the country with an opportunity to study with world-class artists and to provide our students with a music education of the highest artistic…

Arts & Culture
5
Classical Music Chicago

Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.

Arts & Culture
6
Foundation for Modern Opera
7
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
8
Chicago Sinfonietta Inc

Chicago Sinfonietta is a professional orchestra dedicated to modeling and promoting diversity, inclusion, and both racial and cultural equity in the arts through the universal language of symphonic music. Our core values are built around…

Arts & Culture
9
Illinois Philharmonic Orchestra

Illinois Philharmonic Orchestra's mission as a professional orchestra is to utilize the universal expression of music to create profound, inspiring, and personal connections between the people and communities of Chicagos Southland.

Arts & Culture
10
Chamber Opera of Chicago
11
Florida Grand Opera Inc

The mission of florida grand opera is to enrich people's lives through an awareness and deeper appreciation of opera while supporting the operations of the greater miami opera and the opera guild, inc. by expanding its reach to diverse…

Arts & Culture
12
String Insiders

String Insiders' mission is to inspire violin, viola, and cello students through online and in-person connections to teachers, peers, and a wealth of information that challenges and encourages them in their growth as a musician and helps…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago School of Violin Making Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Israel Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Lyric Opera of Chicago — $200,000 · Arts & CultureLyric Opera of ChicagoTHE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INCChicago Symphony Orchestra — $75,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony OrchestraMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC — $55,009 · Arts & CultureMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSICGICHIGAMIIN INDIGENOUS NATIONS MUSEUM INC — $36,000 · Arts & CultureGICHIGAMIIN INDIGENOUS NATIONS MUSEUM INC+5 more — $25,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $34,000 · EducationCHICAGO SCHOOL OF VIOLIN MAKING INC — $10,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist University — $2,000 · EducationMILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Recreation & SportsCONGREGATION SUKKAT SHALOM — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $12,000 · OtherARTSMART — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · Other+1 more — $500 · OtherNEW ISRAEL FUND — $5,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $5,000 · International
Arts & Culture$491,509Education$46,000Recreation & Sports$40,000Other$40,000International$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLyric Opera of Chicago — $200,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC — $100,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC — $55,009 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetMILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGICHIGAMIIN INDIGENOUS NATIONS MUSEUM INC — $36,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $34,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTSMART — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCHICAGO SCHOOL OF VIOLIN MAKING INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE JOFFREY BALLET — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALM BEACH OPERA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMount Vernon Virtuosi Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMidwest Young Artists — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Howard L Gottlieb Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Howard L Gottlieb Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Howard L Gottlieb Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph