Skip to content

· Private foundation

Howard Hanna Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$338k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$388kHousing & Shelter$305kArts & Culture$195kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kEducation$80kReligion$75kCommunity Improvement$70kCivil Rights$70kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $220k
$22,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS & ITS CONSTITUENT CHAPTERS$100,000
URBAN LEAGUE$70,000
ALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$50,000
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY$40,000
PITTSBURGH CIVIC LIGHT OPERA$22,500
FAMILY HOUSE$20,000
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS$15,000
PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT GROUP$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER PITTSBURGH$5,000
ST LUCY'S AUXILIARY FOR THE BLIND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $388k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST LUCY'S AUXILIARY FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $135k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $125k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF PITTSBURGH: $35k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF PITTSBURGH: $32k → 11%URBAN LEAGUE OF PITTSBURGH: $25k → 11%ST LUCY'S AUXILIARY TO THE BLIND: $20k → 11%ST LUCY'S AUXILIARY TO THE BLIND: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$930k · 7 repeat orgs$398k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$930k
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+23%

Still filing today

86%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $263k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FAMILY HOUSE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $290k · revenue +28%
  • CL
    CIVIC LIGHT OPERA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
    2× · 2021–2023 · $72k · revenue +24%
  • SL
    ST LUCY'S AUXILIARY TO THE BLIND
    3× · 2021–2024 · $36k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PITTSBURGH ORATORY OF ST PHILIP NERI
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • DF
    DRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +20%
  • GC
    GEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
2
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
3
Greater Pittsburgh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

Tourism development organization dedicated to expanding the tourism economy across allegheny county.

—
4
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
5
Pittsburgh Business Group On Health

An employer-led coalition that champions outcomes-based, cost-effective healthcare through education, market expertise, group purchasing, comparative data and decision support.

—
6
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
7
Pennsylvania Builders Association

Incorporated in 1945, the pennsylvania builders association is a nonprofit professional trade organization representing approximately 4,066 members from across the commonwealth. pba members include contractors, builders, and remodelers,…

—
8
Pennsylvania Municipal League

The mission of the pennsylvania municipal league is to represent the interests of its membership and to serve local government by providing programs and cost-effective services and legislation, which strengthens the autonomy of…

—
9
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
10
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
11
Greater Pittsburgh Chamber of Commerce

The greater pittsburgh chamber of commerce (gpcc) is the advocacy affiliate of the allegheny conference on community development (accd). (continued on sch o) the chamber works to improve the competitiveness of the pittsburgh region for…

Community Improvement
12
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban League of Greater Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is Georgian Court University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS & ITS CONSTITUENT CHAPTERS: $100,000 · OtherAMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS & ITS CONST…WINCHESTER THURSTON: $100,000 · OtherWINCHESTER THURSTONURBAN LEAGUE: $70,000 · OtherURBAN LEAGUEALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $50,000 · OtherALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVEL…THE PITTSBURGH ORATORY OF ST PHILIP NERI: $50,000 · OtherTHE PITTSBURGH ORATORY OF ST PHILIP NER…PITTSBURGH CIVIC LIGHT OPERA: $22,500 · Other+6 more: $65,000 · Other+6 moreURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $352,000 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURG…ST LUCY'S AUXILIARY TO THE BLIND: $36,000 · Human ServicesST LUCY'S AUXILIARY TO THE BLINDFAMILY HOUSE INC: $290,000 · HealthFAMILY HOUSE INCDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $60,000 · EducationGEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationCIVIC LIGHT OPERA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $72,300 · Arts & CulturePittsburgh Community Reinvestment G: $20,000 · Community ImprovementDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE: $20,000 · International
Other$457,500Human Services$388,000Health$290,000Education$80,000Arts & Culture$72,300Community Improvement$20,000International$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $352,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $290,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetCIVIC LIGHT OPERA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $72,300 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALLEGHENY CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST LUCY'S AUXILIARY TO THE BLIND: $36,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetPittsburgh Community Reinvestment G: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS WORLDWIDE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVE A MOUNTAIN MISSIONS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillman Family FoundationsPA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillman Family Foundations · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Byham Charitable Foundation Attn Helen Spalaris Foundation Manager · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Heinz Endowments · Upmc Group · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Howard Hanna Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Howard Hanna Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Georgian Court University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Howard Hanna’s filings →

More from the funding graph